User talk:Dashingwill

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anastasia Muñoz have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} ‑ ‑ 19:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Wooeyparks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dashingwill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is too much. Just one edit which I didn't mean to make as Therainbowsend through an IP address, and it earns me this? I love this site too much to give up contributing. If I'm to be let back on, I promise I'll never vandalize again.

Decline reason:

pro forma decline. You have not addressed the socking. You need to appeal on your original acclunt. You need to list all of your accounts there. You need to not edit for 6 months. Honestly, each sock I look at, I see another reason to never unblock you. Please see the message below this one. thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are admitting that you are the same person as Therainbowsend, then please consider NinjaRobotPirate's advice at User talk:Therainbowsend: If you stay off of Wikipedia for six months, you can ask to be unblocked under the standard offer. Note that this has to be done under your original/first account.

In your request, you need to demonstrate some understanding of why you were blocked in the first place. Maybe start by reading the policies on verifiability and sock puppetry. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 06:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dlocierekim; Fine. The way you put it, I'm actually considering giving up. It does require a lot to reason with admins anyway.Dashingwill (talk) 11:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]