User talk:DavidFreeman33AD
Welcome![edit]
Hello, DavidFreeman33AD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Introduction to referencing
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 18:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. Please confirm what edit was removed so I can understand and learn the policy minimums. Peace.
- DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)DavidFreeman
- At Richard Delgado someone reverted you for adding text to a WP:BLP without a reliable source (you added no source to text cortical of him). At Juan Diego your sources fail Wikipedia:Reliable sources, one being a sales site and the other just an Archdiocese publication. I'm glad you asked because looking again the only source for the claim was a "questions" page[https://ebible.com/questions/11907-what-are-the-leaves-of-the-trees-for-the-healing-of-the-nations] which are always useless. So I deleted the whole text. Your edit at the longest running... was a mess, look at it here. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_longest-running_American_broadcast_network_television_series&oldid=1127918524] I suggest that you ask at the Wikipedia:Help desk about what you did wrong. The Wikipedia:Teahouse is also a great place for new users. Doug Weller talk 11:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- The archbishop publication is authority within that religious realm. And it is not useless to refer to "healing" and "leaves" in a philosophical perspective using the Bible because surgeons and physicians use that as a justification for certain types of actual medications as surgical anesthesia even comes from flowers and plants. Thus the source was correct and should not have been disrupted. This is an objective source encyclopedia not a cherry picking and grape squashing station. If it's true and a source, whether you like it or agree is irrelevant. Thus archbishop sources are correct and the links between medicine and philosophies of medicine and a faith reference in the Bible is appropriate. Please restudy the philosophy and intent of wikipedia which I suggest starts back at the Q&A section. Thanks. DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)David Freeman
- Rat editors should go back to the Wiki intentions and stop removing valid sources. DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)OurLadyofSurgery
- DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)David Freeman
- The archbishop publication is authority within that religious realm. And it is not useless to refer to "healing" and "leaves" in a philosophical perspective using the Bible because surgeons and physicians use that as a justification for certain types of actual medications as surgical anesthesia even comes from flowers and plants. Thus the source was correct and should not have been disrupted. This is an objective source encyclopedia not a cherry picking and grape squashing station. If it's true and a source, whether you like it or agree is irrelevant. Thus archbishop sources are correct and the links between medicine and philosophies of medicine and a faith reference in the Bible is appropriate. Please restudy the philosophy and intent of wikipedia which I suggest starts back at the Q&A section. Thanks. DavidFreeman33AD (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- At Richard Delgado someone reverted you for adding text to a WP:BLP without a reliable source (you added no source to text cortical of him). At Juan Diego your sources fail Wikipedia:Reliable sources, one being a sales site and the other just an Archdiocese publication. I'm glad you asked because looking again the only source for the claim was a "questions" page[https://ebible.com/questions/11907-what-are-the-leaves-of-the-trees-for-the-healing-of-the-nations] which are always useless. So I deleted the whole text. Your edit at the longest running... was a mess, look at it here. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_longest-running_American_broadcast_network_television_series&oldid=1127918524] I suggest that you ask at the Wikipedia:Help desk about what you did wrong. The Wikipedia:Teahouse is also a great place for new users. Doug Weller talk 11:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest[edit]
Hello, DavidFreeman33AD. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Trenton Garmon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)