User talk:Dawakin

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Mbhiii (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Dawakin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dawakin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a shill for some other editor (who appears nowhere in the history of the articles I edited(what's up with that?)).

Decline reason:

Even on behavioural evidence, it is clear that you have abused more than one account, and the existence of checkuser evidence gives further confirmation. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't want to abuse this process, so I won't ask for unblocking unless no one sees this and gives me an answer. I went to the "this Sockpuppet investigation for evidence" to see what you're talking about and still don't see what you mean by "behavioural evidence". What are you talking about? I looked at recent histories of articles interesting to me and restored some stuff. What's wrong with that, especially since those edits seem to stay? Dawakin (talk) 02:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]