User talk:Dcotos

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296 Online events: New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023 Announcement In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part of the #1day1woman initiative! Tip of the month: Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dcotos. Thank you for your work on Dharma Narayan Barma. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307 Online events: New: Press women | Alphabet run U, V & W | Central and Eastern Europe Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Wikimedia CEE Spring 2024 - contest with certificates of participation and prizes The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Submission declined on 30 April 2024 by Dcotos - Lena Snow

Hello, I would like you to help me.

Can you please explain the difference in notability / quality of my article draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lena_Snow

to this accpeted article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_W%C3%B6lk

Your criticism told me that I miss secondary sources outside the field.

I analyzed the sources of the other article:

1. Source inside the art field - art gallery

2. Source inside the art field - Art blog

3. Source offline

4. Source inside the art field - Art blog

5. Source inside the art field - Art magazine

6. Source inside the art field - artist's own website  - self-reference

7. Source offline

8. Source inside the art field - art gallery

9. Source inside the art field - Art blog

10. Source offline

11. Source offline

12. Source inside the art field - Art blog

So, as you can see, there are no sources outside the art business as well - according to your criteria this article should be denied either.

Please tell me, what you need to match your expectations, so I can bring this article into wikipedia - as the artist I write about is real, internationally published and exhibited since 2020.

This can be proven by 56 sources which are independent of each other. This is a lot for an artist, who is considered as not notable by you, I have to underline.

I cited 56 real online sources - many more than the article about Anne Wölk. I got even more if you need it to proof the authenticity.

Any help or tips are welcome.

Thank you in advance. JEbert68 (talk) 10:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

@JEbert68 Most of the sources were not reliable as per WP:BIO to meet Basic criteria, People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Blog, social media sites, PR news are not reliable sources. Happy editing! Dcotos (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)