User talk:Delaw34

Ways to improve Jeremiah Fufuyen

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Delaw34, thanks for creating Jeremiah Fufuyen!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs a lead to explain who he is. Both sources have exactly the same info & they appear to be from a press release. Nothing establishes notability. Page needs multiple WP:RS added to establish notability and back up info.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. JamesG5 (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations/references

Hi, thanks for adding more info to Jeremiah Fufuyen. One note, tho, you're adding raw links directly to the article instead of properly creating reference tags. I've corrected all the ones you've posted so far, please see WP:REFSTART and WP:CITE for some directions on how to properly link information. If you need help, ask me on my talk page or you can ask for help at the Teahouse. JamesG5 (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I also rearranged the information to create the lead the article needed, and removed that tag. I cleaned up some of the tense of the language to fit standard use here. Hope this helps! JamesG5 (talk) 07:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help also would like you to help correct the last name on the page title {Jeremiah Fufeyin} and i would also like to add pictures to the article Delaw34 (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. If you're replying to a comment on a talk page, put : in front of your comment to indent it, makes things easier to read. The page is now Jeremiah Fufeyin, if anyone tries to click on the Jeremiah Fufuyen page it takes them to the correct place now. Here's a tutorial on adding pictures WP:PIC, please make sure you're careful about copyright rules! JamesG5 (talk) 07:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, but can't correction be done with relating to the previous name because the previous name was spelled wronglyDelaw34 (talk) 08:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only way to correct spelling in a title is to move the full contents of the page to a new page with the correct spelling, see WP:MOVE for an explanation. Basically I moved everything at Jeremiah Fufuyen to Jeremiah Fufeyin, and now the original Jeremiah Fufuyen page you created redirects automatically to the corrected Jeremiah Fufeyin page. There's no other way to fix it. Effectively, no one will ever notice except us. :) JamesG5 (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit. That information is what we call a "lead," it belongs at the top of the page because it tells who the page is about & why they have a page here. See Kesetebirhan Admasu (another new article from tonight) for an example. It's not part of his early life or family, it's who he is. And that goes at the beginning. :) JamesG5 (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks, can you help adding pictures to the article, am having troubles understanding how to do it, the pictures are mineDelaw34 (talk) 08

27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Thats's in the WP:PIC tutorial. JamesG5 (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

how do i resolve the error messages?Delaw34 (talk) 13:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure which messages you mean. I corrected the placements for each set of images, they should go just under the header for the section they belong to. The spacing looks odd right now because the pictures take up more space than the text, if the text was longer in each section they'd line up correctly. For now, this is the best arrangement. I made a few other corrections. #1, don't put a . or , in between (ref) tags. That just creates errors & "extra text" in the article. #2, you're using [ brackets inside the (ref) tags, no need to use them there & again it creates phantom text in the article. I fixed them all, look at how they look now to copy the format for new ones. #3 the references should go after the claims, so, for instance, in the "Philanthropy" section the references are at the end instead of after Jeremiah's name. #4, you can't make unsourced claims, especially fantastical ones. So I removed the "accurate prophecies" line since that's something that's not sourced & can't be proven, and removed the "prophet of God" line in the lead for the same reason. #5, you were missing spacing in sections of your reference links & it was breaking some of them, I fixed it. The best thing for you to do is to compare my revision with your last version so you can see all the changes I made. A few additional notes, I removed the "single source" and "notability" tags since those issues have been addressed, but left the "more sources" and "primary sources" tags since the ministry's website and press releases are still large parts of the source. I also added some inline tags where there appears to be original research (the entire "philosophy" section) or where a citation from a third party source is needed (church numbers).

Hi thanks for all your efforts. pls can you help updating the page to {Jeremiah Omoto Fufeyin) also where do i add the church numbers? thanksDelaw34 (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; I really dont understand this message Delaw34 (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Jeremiah Fufeyin working days.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah Fufeyin working days.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Jeremiah & Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah & Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah Fufeyin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah Fufeyin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 20:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah working days.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah working days.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah in an Amateur wrestling match.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah in an Amateur wrestling match.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah with his family.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah with his family.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah & Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah & Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah fufeyin youthful days.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah fufeyin youthful days.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah Fufeyin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah Fufeyin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeremiah Fufeyin working days.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah Fufeyin working days.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 23:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeremiah & Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah & Anthonia Fufeyin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeremiah Fufeyin working days.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah Fufeyin working days.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeremiah with his family.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremiah with his family.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blessed Ilukor Idornigie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blessed Ilukor Idornigie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC) Pls can i really understand why my page was deleted Delaw34 (talk) 10:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ibakatv image.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ibakatv image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philippe Yannick Iwuegbu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippe Yannick Iwuegbu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippe Yannick Iwuegbu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Specdo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Specdo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Nahal^(T) 13:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delaw34, once the article has been deleted, contesting the deletion afterwards on article talk is no longer possible and will usually get overlooked (unfortunately the information above is a bit confusing in that regard). But you can still contact the deleting administrator if you like (and if you can provide reliable independent sources to show the topic's notability). Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 14:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edo State

Hello. Your recent edit to Edo State appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Obi Cubana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Obi Cubana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obi Cubana. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 23:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Emareyo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lawrence Emareyo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Emareyo (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lawrence Emareyo instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There already is an article. This draft contains information that is not in the article and should be merged into it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence Emareyo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lawrence Emareyo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Delaw34! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristen Dawodu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristen Dawodu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Dawodu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 03:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Your addition to Kristen Dawodu has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oluwagbenga Oluwafemi Dawodu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oluwagbenga Oluwafemi Dawodu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristen Dawodu. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 20:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed Paid Editing

Hello Delaw34. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Oluwagbenga Oluwafemi Dawodu, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Delaw34. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Delaw34|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Could you explain your vehement approach in seeing this article created? Seeing as you have tried to create this article on a non notable entertainer three times now under different names? Have you a COI to disclose or are you to receive any reward per WP:PAID if this article be successfully created? Please answer these questions truthfully. Celestina007 20:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Nigerian comedians. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 23:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 08:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lawrence Emareyo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawrence Emareyo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Emareyo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 08:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Obinna Iyiegbu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Obinna Iyiegbu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SITH (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|1=The block is no longer necessary because i understand what i was blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead; Delaw34 (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)}Delaw34 (talk) 13:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admins considering this request that no response has been made so far to the enquiry above regardng paid editing. I would hope that the editor will address that issue as a condition of an unblock request being considered. The lack of response suggests that their understanding of the block is flawed. Fiddle Faddle 13:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Delaw34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because i understand what i was blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead and also admit i was paid to do edits; Delaw34 (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is entirely insufficient. What specific paid editing have you done for for whom? What policies did you violate by doing so, and how can we be sure you won't violate these policies again? Yamla (talk) 13:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i cant edit my user page to add those information, i now understand betterDelaw34 (talk) 13:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]