User talk:Deliri

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Damn you and your Daily Doubles[edit]

You Brigand!!! TastemyHouse Breathe, Breathe in the air 07:09, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Core Topics[edit]

Hey Deliri, Thanks for joining us on the Core Topics group. It seems like you know User:Tastemyhouse already, so I won't repeat here the details I posted on User_talk:Tastemyhouse#Core_Topics. Can you have a go at a few assessments too? We'd appreciate your opinions. Can you use these assessment criteria? Look for the obvious things like "hard" references, a nice layout with subheadings, decent writing (not just lots of lists!), grammar & spelling, pictures. If you can judge the quality of the content, so much the better, but I admit I'm a chemist and I can't give an expert opinion on humanities for example. Take a look at some that we've already assessed as A-Class and B-Class, and see what you think. Thanks for getting involved, Walkerma 04:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I have posted a "to-do" list on the talk page, could you sign up for something there, if you have time to work on this? Thanks a lot, Walkerma 04:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ONE DAY IT'LL BE[edit]

MY TURN, TREBEK! TastemyHouse Breathe, Breathe in the air 10:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1.0 Collaboration of the Week[edit]

Hi, I noticed you signed up as a member of the Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team, which is looking to identify quality articles in Wikipedia for future publication on CD or paper. Recently, a 1.0 Collaboration of the Week was created to work on essential topics that are in need of improvement, which will ultimately go in a release version of Wikipedia. You can help by voting, contributing to an article, or simply making a comment. Thank you for your support. :) Gflores ^Talk 07:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Version 1.0 "Release Version Qualifying"[edit]

Hi, I'm interested in your feedback on Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Qualifying. It's essentially an idea to use a process similar to WP:FAC to identify and handle articles and lists that would go in a release version. Maurreen 19:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP 1.0[edit]

I thought since you are interested in this project you might be interested to see a CD version of en now exists see Wikipedia:Wikipedia-CD/Download & 2006 WP CD Selection. This is being discussed on the 1.0 project pages but progress breeds enthusiasm so I thought I would let you know. --BozMo talk 09:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just Wondering[edit]

Are you still around here? If so, I'd like it if you would contact me, for I also go by the name Deliri. I was wondering where you got your name from, and when? (Megilindir 07:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]