User talk:Dill Do Blaster 3000

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dill Do Blaster 3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Are we going to have a problem? I reverted three vandal edits and warned all the people doing them. I do intend to sue Wikimedia for lawyer fees if thsi is not resolved. I can change my user name if youd like

Decline reason:

You should be aware that Wikipedia does not allow users who make legal threats to continue editing. You cannot be unblocked until you unambiguously retract your legal threats, both here and on the IP's talk page, and commit to not making any more, in addition to addressing the reason for your original block. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 02:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, let me edit the IP talk page and I'll revert the offending edit. !!!!Dill Do Blaster 3000 (talk) 02:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC) help me get unblocked plsease[reply]

Sorry, but your name alone will keep you blocked. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to change it. I said that already. I feel ignored.

You will be ignored too if you were vandalizing. I did not look into your edit history, but your name was not a good choice. Also, please sign all of your edits with the four tildes as you see that I am doing. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I thoughti t was funny. My whole edit history is reverting vandalizm and warning the vandals

Please sign your edits... — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will but I did nothing wroung except for the user page unless reverting valdanism is wrong but it's not because I red policy 02:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Dill Do Blaster 3000 (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dill Do Blaster 3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

new name: DDB3000. I will revert the edit on the IP's talk page once i am unblocked. so do so

Decline reason:

Clearly you are not suited to editing Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 05:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to verbally say here that you have no intention of pursuing legal action now or in the future before you get unblocked; it's not really about reverting your edits itself. To answer your other comment above, the reversion of the vandalism itself wasn't a problem, but every other aspect of your editing has been. The edit summaries you used to revert the vandalism (now revision-deleted, so that only admins can see them) were quite inappropriate, and your "warning" of the IP editors with legal threats was not at all helpful. I don't care much about your username itself, but it's not a promising sign either. If you've read policy, you would know this is not how we do things; we take Wikipedia seriously, and it's not a place for goofing around; you will need to acknowledge these problems and express some knowledge of how things actually work around here before an unblock will be feasible.Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 02:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of persuring legal action once I am unblocked. I will attest to that in a court of law if questioned, so save this edit. !02:39, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Great, that's a start, but you still have all of the rest of the stuff I mentioned to answer for. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 02:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest blocking this user from being able to edit their own TP. They just proved they cannot even do that with decency. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Dill Do Blaster 3000 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Dill Do Blaster 3000, you may be blocked from editing. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Dill Do Blaster 3000. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Why can't I just make a new account? That will unblock me instantly"

Because they will block your IP address, and any range of IPs that you use, and track devices that you use. Long story short, just freaking be a constructive editor on the encyclopedia or you will be blocked indefinitely anywhere and everywhere you try to edit. Good day. TY. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have more money than moral. this wiki i

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Dill Do Blaster 3000. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...and good riddance! — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]