User talk:Dillipan

Dillipan, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Dillipan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dillipan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 13:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 13:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kosapet

This was your first edit on Wikipedia here almost 2 years ago. Unfortunately, no one told you that that removing useful content from a page like that is not acceptable. I have reverted the page back. 220 of ^Borg 13:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple

You need to add some textual content to this page you created. Right now it just looks like a picture album, not an encyclopaedia article. 220 of ^Borg 18:24, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015 b

Previewing

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 18:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The related edit you did is here. 220 of ^Borg 03:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not adhering to the Manual of style

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 03:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically I refer to centering headings, and making them BOLD and making them BIG as well, all at the same time. This is not how it is done on Wikipedia (WP). 220 of ^Borg 03:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates 2

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 12:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kosapet, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. This is the second time you have removed the info-box from Kosapet without explanation. Kindly desist. 220 of ^Borg 12:46, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple

The article Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references or context, Wikipedia is not an upload database. If this page has merit, please help it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Garchy (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015 c

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

You have now removed valid maintenance template messages three (3) times without fixing the issues raised, and without any explanation despite several notice on this page. 220 of ^Borg 23:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing.
You have now removed the templates from this page 4 times. 220 of ^Borg 09:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple. And you have now removed the templates 5 times! [1] 220 of ^Borg 09:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 220 of ^Borg 09:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dillipan reported by User:220 of Borg (Result: ). Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 10:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 22:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Sri Vaembu Aathi Muthumari Amman Temple

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dillipan reported by User:220 of Borg (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]