User talk:Divyadrishtifans

New message from Cyphoidbomb

Hello, Divyadrishtifans. You have new messages at Talk:Divya Drishti.
Message added 02:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC) Wow i love it i will help you but you do something for me if i do it you will make my youtube to start showing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.89.33.63 (talk) 11:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Divyadrishtifans, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Divyadrishtifans! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Let us please discuss the changes you are trying to make.

The show is not exclusively about just the characters Karan and Preeta. Preeta as a character doesn't describe herself as Mrs. Karan Luthra. Why are you spreading false information. Karan and Preeta are not husband and wife until Preeta claims herself to be so. Which may or may not happen. TheM19935393 (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheM19935393: In the section below, I have invited the user to the relevant talk page discussion. The discussion should probably take place there, since this appears to be a recurring issue, and other editors might benefit from discussing there. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karan and Preeta's marriage under law is voidable and fulfils the grounds of annulment. But more importantly it is niether in factuality accepted in the show by neither Preeta nor Karan. But even more importantly Kundali Bhagya as a show was never just about Karan and Preeta to begin with. Changing Preeta's name in the cast now would create confusion later on. As they will likely be getting married again. More so than that, Preeta's surname need not be changed simply because she got misrepresented into a fraudulent marriage. TheM19935393 (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She claimed her relationship with him in episode 624 Even her and Karan’s family see her as Karan’s wife. They even want him to give his marriage with Preeta a second chance and they want him to accept Preeta as his wife. Preeta and Karan might be getting married for the second time in the upcoming episodes what will you do then? Will you keep editing the page? Will you accept the truth after they get married for the second time? Divyadrishtifans (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is precisely what I am saying the legality of Preeta being married to Karan now is niether wholely accepted by Preeta as of episode 747. Considering, the marriage is voidable under the law and is niether legally registered nor socially accepted as of 'Yet' it is best if we keep the status quo. Until an actual resolution is reached in the show. Why are you getting so upset? If you truly believe in Karan and Preeta becoming eventual life partners it wouldn't matter what her name is on wikipedia. TheM19935393 (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Cyphoidbomb

Hello, Divyadrishtifans. You have new messages at Talk:Kundali Bhagya#The last name of main female lead hasn't changed Yet..
Message added 18:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Since you have made changes in the area being discussed, your participation would be appreciated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indian Pro Music League

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Indian Pro Music League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Belwine (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kundali Bhagya did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ManaliJain (talk) 04:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kundali Bhagya, you may be blocked from editing. ManaliJain (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kundali Bhagya without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kundali Bhagya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]