User talk:DoDung2001

Welcome![edit]

Hello, DoDung2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ekips39 (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer Thank you so much ^^ DoDung2001 (talk) 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Maya in 2009.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Maya in 2009.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 14:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monchanok Saengchaipiangpen[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Monchanok Saengchaipiangpen, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sharerice.com/index.php/Mo_Monchanok_Saengchaipiangpen.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello DoDung2001, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I noticed that you recently removed some content from South Korea with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Korea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NebY (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mai Thu Huong[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mai Thu Huong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Namthip Jongrachatawiboon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also see WP:TONE so that you can write objective, non-emotional prose rather than flowery WP:PEACOCK. DMacks (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FLC nomination reviews[edit]

Hi, I'm one of the Featured List Candidate delegates, the ones who promote/don't promote FLC nominations. I've noticed that you've been reviewing candidates recently—which is great! We love that!—but also that the reviews in question are short "good list" style reviews. You're free to review however you want, of course, but speaking as a person who has to read through the nominations to decide if they should be promoted, reviews like that are generally completely discounted- especially if someone after you finds a bunch of substantive issues. Consider in the future, if you can, reviewing a bit more in depth to make sure there are no issues, even minor issues, with the candidate articles you are reviewing. It really is a shame for nominators to get a positive review, only for the delegate to have to ignore it—no one ends up feeling good in that situation. --Pres N 00:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lorde[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Lorde, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nymf (talk) 06:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/York City F.C./addition2[edit]

Hi, I see you supported the Liverpool F.C. FTC nomination. Would you be interested in checking out the York City F.C. supplementary nomination? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattythewhite (talk) Done. Would you be interested in checking out the Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Lorde? Thank you! DoDung2001 (talk) 04:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Every so often, a checkuser finds something that is quite incredulous. Today is one of those days. For whatever reason you decided it was a good idea to edit war with your sockpuppet -- User:LovelyMemory2001. I also see more and more instances of you vandalizing logged out, which I'm not allowed to link to here. Whatever game you are playing, it is over. I've indefinitely blocked your account. Courcelles (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Deepika Padukone[edit]

Portal:Deepika Padukone, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Deepika Padukone and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Deepika Padukone during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Vensatry _(ping) 12:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Lorde[edit]

Portal:Lorde, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lorde and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Lorde during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Deepika Padukone/Intro[edit]

Portal:Deepika Padukone/Intro, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Deepika Padukone/Intro and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Deepika Padukone/Intro during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 08:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]