User talk:DocSomeone

Welcome![edit]

Hi DocSomeone! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —Charles Edward ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 23:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DocSomeone/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DocSomeone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your article Fire-Talamh[edit]

Hi! Your article, Fire-Talamh, isn't suitable for Wikipedia. We don't hold fictional content, and that usually will fall under the category of hoaxes. However, considering the effort you put into this, I would advise you to preserve the source as soon as possible: other projects that use the MediaWiki system can store your writings (except for the infobox, you'll have to copy over the very complex templates or make it yourself). In a few minutes it will have to be posted for deletion. You are free to join or help editing in other parts of Wikipedia, and I suggest the country or the history wikiprojects. Thank you! ‒overthrows 18:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fire-Talamh[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Fire-Talamh, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‒overthrows 18:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the first article's content is on your sandbox, I went ahead and marked Fire-Talamh for deletion. Fictional articles are still not allowed even in userspace (see WP:FAKEARTICLE), so I suggest you preserve both your sandboxes. ‒overthrows 18:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned in the article that it was fictional and I didn't know it was posted. I was trying to make another sandbox DocSomeone (talk) 17:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DocSomeone/sandbox10[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on DocSomeone/sandbox10 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! I forgot to put the User: and I needed it deleted anyway DocSomeone (talk) 01:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Subcontrabassoon[edit]

Hello, DocSomeone. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Subcontrabassoon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]