User talk:DoesWhateverASpiderCant

Welcome![edit]

Hello, DoesWhateverASpiderCant!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Helen(💬📖) 17:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! My friend showed me how to edit Wikipedia so hopefully I'm doing it right.

Karen Westerfield moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Karen Westerfield, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) There is only one reliable source covering the subject so far that I could find, so the article does not meet WP:GNG yet. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Yeeno (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Karen Westerfield has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karen Westerfield. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marissa Kawehi Loving (April 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOLAR. Unclear as to what importance her racial background has in establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marissa Kawehi Loving and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marissa Kawehi Loving, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DoesWhateverASpiderCant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cohl Furey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whole number. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karen Westerfield has been accepted[edit]

Karen Westerfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zeromonk (talk) 15:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Viktória Woth[edit]

Hello, DoesWhateverASpiderCant,

Thank you for creating Viktória Woth.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Zdunik moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Anna Zdunik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clara Löh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clara Löh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clara Löh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

D.Lazard (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cathryn S. Dippo[edit]

Can't you at least say something about what kind of statistician Cathryn S. Dippo was, where she was educated, and where she worked? Otherwise there is no point in having an article at all. See WP:NOTDIR. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:55, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm trying to find more stuff, I won't be finished till later tonight.

Proposed deletion of Cathryn S. Dippo[edit]

The article Cathryn S. Dippo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability? Maybe there aren't sufficient references, but it appears unclear for now.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on your edits Suggestion[edit]

Many of the edits that you have made relating to the U.S. Coast Guard (SPARS, Women in the Coast Guard) do not have edit summaries and it is sometimes difficult to tell what has been edited. Please include an edit summary with each edit. Cuprum17 (talk) 20:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022 vandalism[edit]

Can you explain this edit? Fred Zepelin (talk) 15:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copied it from elsewhere didnt' check source sorry.

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it has been used to evade blocks on other IP addresses and accounts. The more often you evade the block instead of requesting an unblock, the less likely it becomes that any administrator will ever agree to unblock you. Also, any editing you do while evading blocks is liable to reverting on sight, which will not be the case if you make an unblock request and it is accepted. As long as any block is in place for the purpose of preventing you from editing you are not permitted to edit. That applies whether the block(s) is/are or IP addresses, accounts, or both. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page. JBW (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, DoesWhateverASpiderCant

Thank you for creating Linda Cantello.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Zdunik has been accepted[edit]

Anna Zdunik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.