User talk:Donald Trung/Archive 80

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2021-52

Wikidata weekly summary #500

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

January 2022

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at History of Tibet (1950–present), you may be blocked from editing. Don't add unreliable source Rastinition (talk) 13:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

@Rastinition: you removed the Wall Street Journal, a reliable source. Your unwarranted removal of reliable sources is quite disruptive, warning me over restoring a reliable source with a threat of blocking doesn't really shine a good light on your actions. --Donald Trung (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Tibet_%281950%E2%80%93present%29&type=revision&diff=1063143967&oldid=1063143126 14:00, 1 January 2022‎ Rastinition talk contribs‎ 79,359 bytes +450‎ Restore part of ref.
You only noticed the warning but did not notice that I did restore what should be restored.I have nothing else to talk to you.Contact with you makes me feel bad. Rastinition (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Idem ditto. --Donald Trung (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Qing dynasty coinage. 19:42, 5 January 2022: Donald Trung triggered filter 1,045, performing the action "edit" on Qing dynasty coinage. Actions taken: Warn; Filter description: Self-published (blog / web host) Rastinition (talk) 22:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

When the filter is triggered, you ignore the system warning and save the edit without checking.

If you are not sure whether your edit will trigger the filter, you can split the edit several times. This will make it easier for you to check.--Rastinition (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

You're leaving threats of blocking for triggering edit filters, but if you ever read the policies you think you're enforcing you'd understand why some self-published sources are acceptable and when, the WordPress blog that hit the filter simply hosts a 1900 contemporary account of the Manchu Qing Dynasty. Your removals are very close to vandalism but assuming that you mean well I will just assume that you don't understand the policies you think you're enforcing, despite others explaining to you how overzealous your removals are by user "Coumets" and here by user "Alexis Jazz". Also, you use these warning templates carelessly. --Donald Trung (talk) 22:51, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
See this isolation, also "note: "Acceptable source as it hosts photographs and information from the 1900 book." Wouldn't want to add such a note but some overzealous people would remove sources without checking for context.". Specifically referring to people like you that can't tell the difference between when to use self-published sources and when not to use them. --Donald Trung (talk) 22:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Are you sure you only trigger wordpress?If you are sure, I can put back wordpress content. But I only put back wordpress. Rastinition (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
I will check all sources, I had already removed KKNews from the restoration, I am not opposed to improving the article by replacing bad sources with good ones, I am just against the massive blanking of large parts of the article because it's supposedly too long. I had suggested splitting it up before to another user but in its old state it shows a concise history of the Qing coinage from its inception to its demise and as it's the best documented Chinese dynastic coinage period it simply has more information because more has been written about it. --Donald Trung (talk) 23:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2022-01

Wikidata weekly summary #501