User talk:Drittner

Welcome to the project

Hi Don, and welcome to Wikipedia (well, welcome since 2006). I must say I was rather surprised to find you on here. Most historians (especially those that make money off their craft) don't spend much time here, let alone write on Wikipedia, which is typically looked down upon by the professionals. I'm not a professional. Well, not a professional historian, at least. I'm a writer/editor/user, whatever you want to call us here, and a member of a Wikiproject called Wikiproject Capital District and we are working hard to better the quality of articles related to the Capital District. I'm familiar with much of your historical work, since I've been using many of them as sources here (preferably only when I can't find the primary/original source myself). I'm not sure how much experience you've had on here, but Wikipedia can be a great place, and in my opinion it is the perfect medium to share local history since there is unlimited capacity and opportunity (it all depends on who's willing to help out). Based on your contributions, I'll assume you don't have that much experience here, but you might be surprised to find the level of quality you'll see in articles here, especially about the Capital District. Oakwood Cemetery (Troy, New York) is one I got elevated to featured article status a few months ago, Central Troy Historic District is a good article, written by a NRHP buff, etc.; these are some of the other articles that are of high quality here. I also do a lot of photography around the area. Just recently, the librarian at Union College rewrote that article (I expect we will pass a good article nomination in the near future). There's a lot of work going on here. You might be surprised. I'd like to ask if you'd maybe just peruse around a bit, maybe make some comments on some of the (better) articles and weigh your professional opinion. I'm sure we would all appreciate it. For instance, we're currently rewriting the Albany, New York article with the hopes we can make it into a featured article soon. upstate NYer 00:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome but not sure how to reply to this or find my way around here?

To reply, just type in the edit window and save your addition (like you did above). End your comments with four tildes (~~~~) to sign your posts so we know you said them. upstate NYer 19:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

helpnme How do I find user Gutogonz here???

User names are listed at the following standard link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:___________. In this case you're looking for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gutogonz. That user's talk page (where you leave messages) is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gutogonz. But it looks like that is not a valid username. Case and spaces matter, if that has anything to do with it. Also, to use the help me template in the future, copy and paste the following text: {{helpme}} (including the braces). Type your question underneath that text. On an unrelated note, another editor and I are completing the list of NRHP properties in the city of Albany. I'm currently using the plaque for Fort Orange on the curb in front of the SUNY building to represent Fort Orange. However, knowing you did the dig for Fort Orange, I was hoping you may have a photo you would be okay making free (either CC-BY-SA or public domain) to represent the site. The other editor and I have agreed that the plaque is not an appropriate object to represent an entire fort or archeological dig. What do you think? You can respond either here or on my talk page. Add your comments at the bottom of the page under a heading ==Heading title== and sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) so I know you wrote it. Thanks, Matt Wade upstate NYer 19:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger J. Cheng

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger J. Cheng, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.rogercheng.com/SCIENTISTS%20in%20WEATHER%20and%20CLIMATE-%20CHENG%20by%20DON%20RITTNER.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 16:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roger J. Cheng

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Roger J. Cheng, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://rogerjcheng.com/SCIENTISTS%20in%20WEATHER%20and%20CLIMATE-%20CHENG%20by%20DON%20RITTNER.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 12:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The material you are talking about is my own writing I own the copyright and the words and the other is located in roger's web site. Drittner (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)don[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Drittner. You have new messages at Jac16888's talk page.
Message added 09:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jac16888 ^Talk 09:12, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained why I deleted the page, please read the following: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials, and then since we don't want the content as it was anyway, then read WP:NEUTRAL, WP:BLP, WP:REF and WP:LAY--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Drittner/Roger J. Cheng has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger J. Cheng, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Roger J. Cheng (August 24)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roger J. Cheng

Hello Drittner,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Roger J. Cheng, may be copied from http://rogerjcheng.com/SCIENTISTS%20in%20WEATHER%20and%20CLIMATE-%20CHENG%20by%20DON%20RITTNER.htm. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning

You continue to ignore everything you have been told about this article. To be very clear: A) you need to provide actual evidence you own the copyright, saying "I own the copyright" is not evidence. B) Even if you do so, the page will still most likely be deleted for all the reasons I have explained to you before, it is biased, it is badly referenced and it is badly formatted. I have moved the page to your userspace (User:Drittner/Roger J. Cheng) for the time being, but I will not hesitate to delete it if you move it back without correcting it, nor will I hesitate to block you from editing if you continue recreating it--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SSRR

Don, I'm learning as I go. The article Saratoga and Schenectady Railroad and others has Sylvester's 1878 map. I think the D&H mostly follows the route, except the D&H bypasses Ballston Spa And Saratoga. I was just looking today and it looks like the "Jim Tedisco Fitness Trail" in Ballston Spa follows the route from Front Street to the Union Mill, I could see the abutments of a bridge over the Kaydeross. From there it presumably stays left of Route 50 (the D&H stays right) up to the "Railroad Run" trail in Saratoga. Next time I get out I may try to see where the ROW crosses Geyser Road.Peter Flass (talk) 22:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: Drittner

Hello I am hoping some seasoned Wiki users can help me. I have published close to 40 books on various subjects and have been trying to post an article on a scientist that I have written extensively about. It keeps getting bounced saying there is copyrighted info in it BUT it is my information from my books and articles. I own the words. I have tried to explain this to an editor who keeps threatening me and ma quite fed up with it. Is there anyone who can look at the article and give me suggestions? Thanks. The article is Roger J. Cheng. Don

Please see the advice given to you when you filed on the DRN: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 77#User:Drittner/Roger J._Cheng, the same advice I have given you repeatedly which you have yet to listen to--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Drittner/Roger J. Cheng (October 4)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drittner/Roger J. Cheng.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dovid (talk) 05:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dovid, you say it needs reliable sources? The sources are published encycopedias and scientific journals??? What else could I use? Don74.70.103.68 (talk) 22:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request

Sorry, I'm not all that active these days with other stuff taking up my time IRL. That said, I read through your situation here and there are a few things you'll want to know if you're going to begin editing Wikipedia:

When you add something to Wikipedia you are completely giving up your copyright, period. Be aware of that. That means that if you're taking portions of already-written materials, you're giving up the copyright of those portions of your writings. More info at WP:C and WP:DCM. (That means that portions you've already given up have been completely released under Creative Commons. This is irrevocable.)
Wikipedia is not a place to use terms like "important" and "major" in a biography without some serious backup. Those terms are limited to people like Einstein, Lincoln, and Newton. Across the content of Wikipedia, I would argue that Cheng does not qualify for terms like that, which is one reason the users are pushing back on your submission.
That said, using your own works isn't against the rules that I'm aware of. In fact, use of the WP:OTRS system should allow for you to confirm that you are the true copyright holder. That said, much of the writing style you use doesn't fit with Wikipedia's writing guidelines. I'll go through your article and play with it a little bit to drop any bias or point of view (WP:NPOV).

I'll get back to you this. The writing style of Wikipedia isn't an easy one, and definitely isn't one that, based on your typical writing style (I've read many of your books) fits well here. So it requires some work on your part to be more "encyclopedic". That said, I don't believe that the editors that have spoken with you so far have given you the credit you deserve nor have they looked into all possible options. This could be a bit of a don't bit the newbie situation. Anyway, I'll get back to you in a bit. upstate NYer 17:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger Cheng (November 11)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 04:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your images may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since August. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng

Hello, Drittner. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Roger Cheng".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roger Cheng, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Roger Cheng concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Roger Cheng, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger Cheng

Hello, Drittner. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Roger Cheng".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]