User talk:Dylan620/Archives/2009/April

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Rochelle discussion notice

New Rochelle problem discussion notification: I've opened a new discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Long-running problem with respect to New Rochelle area articles.

This relates to the 4 part proposal i opened on March 26, which was closed on March 27 and archived at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive187#Proposal for unban, apology, amnesty for Jvolkblum and related others, and topic ban for Orlady.

This is a courtesy notice to all parties who had more than a one word comment in the previous discussion. I think it is a problem that won't go away, and I hope that you will be part of the solution, whether or not you and I have agreed previously. I hope that we can at least clarify the problem, if not immediately agree upon a solution. If anyone thinks this is inappropriate canvassing, I am sure they will express that. I don't anticipate too many separated discussions on this topic, but if this one is closed and a new one opens, I'll probably notify you again, unless you ask me not to. doncram (talk) 03:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for alerting me, Doncram. Dylan620 :  Chat  09:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

For anybody who stalks this talk page...

Please participate in my fake RfB! Dylan620 :  Chat  22:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

With an hour left in the day, why? Heh. :D iMatthew :  Chat  22:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Technically, my April Fool's Day ends in five hours; so an extra four hours on me! Dylan620 :  Chat  23:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
FACT - Aprils fools finished at 12pm this afternoon - so your all fools :P Jason Rees (talk) 23:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
April Fools Day is over. It's 12.06am people! (If you live in the UK...) Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Actually, it's 8:01pm! (If you live in Massachusetts...) Dylan620 :  Chat  00:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for arbitration - Unjustified ban of users

I have filed a request for arbitration regarding recent bans of user accounts from which no activities could be found that dispupt Wikipedia. The arbitration request can be found here: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Block of editors related to sockpuppet Jvolkblum You are not mentioned as an involved party, I send you this message as a courtesy for your information, and I hope that your opinion there can contribute to solve the issue. Thank you! doxTxob \ talk 23:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Currently reserved ACC requests

Hi Dylan. Just so you know, you currently are reserving a closed request at WP:ACC, here. ∗ \ / (⁂) 10:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Possible hijinks by your adoptee, Ciaran UK

Hello Dylan620. See WP:AN#User: Ciaran UK. EdJohnston (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment at AN, which added the missing bit of information! I've submitted Ciaran UK's name at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fila3466757 and requested a checkuser. EdJohnston (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey.

I answered on my IP page, but, I'm pretty much retired from WP, at least temporarily, and probably permanently. Getting D's Admin bit back is one of the few things that interest me with regards to WP. SirFozzie (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question regarding ACC

I did the request because the request was left there for about 30 minutes without you taking action on it. I didn't see you online (on the bottom of the screen), so I did it. I want to just give you this advice, do the request soon after you reserve it, so people don't complain about waiting. Sorry about that through. Techman224Talk 20:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I broke the reservation because I had to do something and I didn't have the time to do it, if someone does break their reservation, then it's ok to reserve it yourself. Techman224Talk 23:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Help

Yep, give me a day or so. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I saw your request for help on the timeline article at Julian's talk page. Look at recently promoted FL timelines for a model, e.g., Timeline of the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Happy Thehelpfulone's Day!

Hi Dylan!

Thanks for that - glad I could be helpful! I'll put that on my userpage! ;)

The Helpful One 17:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #25

Number 25, April 4

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to provide a summary of both the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclones. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers March 2009.

Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.

Satellite image of Hamish near peak intensity

Storm of the month
Cyclone Hamish formed as a Tropical Low to the south of Papua New Guinea on March 4. The low quickly organized and became Tropical cyclone Hamish the following day. Hamish then started to rapidly intensify, becoming the second severe tropical cyclone of the season the next day. Throughout much of its duration, it moved southeastward, parallel to the coast of Queensland. It underwent rapid deepening over a period of 48 hours, Hamish reached peak winds of 215 km/h (130 mph) according to the Australia Bureau of Meteorology, making the cyclone a Category 5 on the Australian intensity scale. It quickly weakened due to wind shear, and without moving ashore it stalled and turned to a northwest drift. The low dissipated on March 5.

Hamish indirectly caused a major environmental disaster along the Queensland coastline, when strong waves from the cyclone damaged the hull of a cargo ship, spilling 260 tonnes of fuel and oil into the ocean. The oil washed onto the coastline, endangering the environment prompting a costly cleanup. Offshore, the fishermen went missing after the boat was lost; one person was found, although the other two remained missing and were presumed dead. As the storm remained offshore, overall damage directly from the storm was minor, primarily from strong waves.

Other tropical cyclone activity

  • Australia – In addition to Cyclone Hamish, three other cyclones formed and were named as Gabrielle, Ilsa and Jasper. However, there was no impact reported from these three storms whilst in the Australian region.
  • South Pacific – This month Cyclones Joni and Ken formed near to the Cook Islands, whilst Cyclone Jasper moved into the area at its peak and brought heavy rain and coastal erosion to New Caledonia. On the last day of the month Tropical Depression 14F formed to the northeast Fiji.
  • South-West Indian – Severe Tropical Storm Izilda was the only storm to form in the South-West Indian Ocean this month; however the extratropical remnants of Ilsa moved into the region from the Australian basin.

Member of the month

Cyclone barnstar
Cyclone barnstar

The member of the month is... Ramisses, has been a member of the Project since January 2008. He is a usefull editor who helps to make the trackmaps for the current season articles, as well as numerous other storms, from previous seasons. We just hope he is able to keep on top of the trackmaps when the busy part of the year comes!

Main Page content

Storm article statistics

Grade Nov Dec Feb Mar
FA 50 50 56 56
A 19 19 17 17
GA 198 202 239 244
B 21 22 14 15
C 118 122 122 120
Start 210 210 198 192
Stub 16 17 28 34
Total 631 642 669 678
ω 2.87 2.87 2.80 2.81
percentage
≥Less than C 		35.8 35.4 33.0 33.3
percentage
≥GA or better 		42.2 42.2 46.6 46.8

Project News
There is a discussion on the state of the project, discussing whether it still works like it used to, and what can be done about it. One extreme position is labeling the project inactive, while another position is eliminating some of the bureaucracy. Input would be very beneficial.

As part of the above discussion, there is a request for all active members to sign a list to affirm they are still active members in the project. If you don't sign the list, or if you don't consider yourself active anymore, your name will be placed on the inactive members list on May 1st.

Hurricanehink has organised a challenge to try and improve some of the Tropical cyclone articles. The rules are that you must take either an seasonal or a storm article from one of the eight basins we have, that is either a Stub, Start class or a brand new article and improve it to at least GA status. However to avoid several articles on cyclones that did not affect land, Hurricanehink has limited the challenge to storms/seasonal articles of Mid-importance or higher. Their is an exception to this rule for the Central Pacific as Cyclones rarely form in this basin. - For full details of the challenge see the Project's Talkpage Project member list

Jason Rees (talk) 01:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

You, sir!

Thank you very much for the comments. Ear to ear smile has appeared. :)

Also, damn you for supporting with an open question, open ended questions always get me thinking -- it's dangerous thing when I have to think. — neuro(talk)(review) 21:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Nope - that IP is in America. I'm sure Ironholds and FlyingToaster (who saw me two days ago) will vouch that I am in England. :) — neuro(talk)(review) 00:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the T-shirt

and special thanks for the chance to block my first user. Old Testie has just made his last vandal edit! Paxse (talk) 14:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Adoption accepted!

Hi Dylan, Thanks, I accept gladly. That's great. Do I take my name off the "up for adoption" list or will that happen automatically now? Cheers, John --JohnTheSupercargo (talk) 16:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

User:ItsLassieTime ban template fix

Damn! I redir-ed 12 sock talkpages and checked their blocks, marked umpteen subthreads resolved on AN/I, added the user to the Banlist... I knew I'd forget something! Thanks for fixing that. Tonywalton Talk 00:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

First one I've actually done. That was one weird puppetteer. Cheers, Tonywalton Talk 00:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate your gentle reminder about transclusion. All the best! Law shoot! 10:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: RfA

I just saw no point in continuing a discussion which was obviously going to end one way. I appreciate your support, and everyone else's who !voted on that RfA, but it is incredibly hard to continue when everything I have been working on for the past six months is claimed to be some sort of façade. As for WP:100, I'm not too bothered about arbitrary numbers, I'm more worried that I am doing the right thing, and from what I am being told, it is clear that such is not the case. I do find it hard to bear the community's excoriation, but I trust that they are a better judge of myself than I. Again, thanks a lot, Dylan. Your confidence in me speaks a lot, and it is much more important to keep such confidence and trust by not letting people down than grasping for something of which it would be inappropriate to receive at this time. Thanks, though, and I really do mean that. :) — neuro(talk)(review) 20:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Cyclonebiskit#RFA

Before going forward with Cyclonebiskit's RFA, you might want to consider my comments/advice offered on his talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 02:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

I was a bit surprised at the glitter and pizazz you added to my talk page, but really it was no problem. I really hope you stick around, as we really, really need quality editors making quality articles! I hope to see you around. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Heya, just checking to see how things are. How is the timeline? Got any grandiose plans (FT perhaps??) now that you're back in action in the WPTC? See you around --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
It's been a busy few days. Well, good luck with all that you're doing, as always. While I'd love if you could help with much more important articles than timelines (hint hint...), at least some work from a volunteer is better than no work at all! :) --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

WT:RfA admin candidate

Hey, I've replied at to you at my talk page as I wasn't sure if you were watching or not. Cheers! —Cyclonenim | Chat  23:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Redacted by PeterSymmonds? What's that about? Haha. Thanks for the somewhat enthusiastic support, anyway. —Cyclonenim | Chat  11:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Ah I see, sorry I'm not too up-to-date with the running gags at RfA :) —Cyclonenim | Chat  11:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
o_o PeterSymonds (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Wow my own Day!

Does this mean I can have that day off work from now on? That would be very cool indeed. Thanks very much Dylan and stay frosty! Cheers, Paxse (talk) 07:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

There was a discussion going on about that request, hence the delay. Thanks for poking me anyway. Cheers, Paxse (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyclonebiskit

Is he going to answer the questions or did you just transclude early? Malinaccier (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I would temporarily remove the page from RfA to avoid "didn't answer the questions" opposes, but it's up to you. Malinaccier (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Give him chance - Hes ploughing through them now Jason Rees (talk) 16:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your RfA

Thanks for nominating me btw, I'm working on the questions now :) Cyclonebiskit 16:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

An ounce of advice is requsted

{{helpme}} According to the interface at WP:ACC, I've hit the six-per-day limit. Yay me! But I'd love to continue helping ACC today, and to do that, I would need the Account Creator userright. However, this is only the second time that I've ever hit the limit, with the first time being my first day on the job back in late March. Should I request the right at WP:PERM/ACC? --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 20:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes please. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Don't bother - I just gave it to you. Enjoy. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
LOL, thanks Hersfold. :) --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 21:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for adoption notice

Thanks for accepting my request. As it suggest, I am a newbie into wikipedia and need to know more of my way around. My first article needed a lot of rewrite. NPOV is my main concern and as one editor suggest cite reliable sources other than from the net. Hopefully I can work it up before it gets deleted. Thanks! 03:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xapis (talk • contribs)

re User talk:Aun mehdi

I have not bothered to link the above page, since I deleted it per your WP:CSD#G8 but I note you had not tagged the userpage. I have now deleted that page also, but could not find an appropriate criteria so did it under "Other", noting that it was an inappropriate use of a userpage - hosting a none notable article. The reason I am telling you all this is because I wish to congratulate you on your enterprise; by listing the talkpage as G8 you required the admin to review the userpage, which you did not tag since there was no clear criteria. Good thinking, and well worked. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

FYI, I see there is a category WP:CSD#U2 which was used on the userpage of another talkpage tagged by you. I hope this helps for the future. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

RfA

Regarding User_talk:A_Nobody#Suggested_as_admin_candidate, I have started User:A Nobody/RfA. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 20:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

RFA thanks

My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Dylan!,

It is nice to see you around! --Yue of the North 23:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

How do you like my signature? --Irdicent 23:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Dylan - Sorry for the mistake. I'm still trying to figure out how to respond to false accusations of vandalism.Twiddlebug (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Twiddlebug 4/11/09

Discuss it with him? He told me he was going to have me banned for vandalizing a page when I didn't vandalize anything. If he had talked to me in a calm manner saying why he was deleting my post, I would have responded in kind. But threatening me with banning (falsely) and falsely accusing me of vandalism does not call for a friendly discussion.Twiddlebug (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

On behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 06:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Irdicent Day

Thanks a lot!!! ----Irdicent 23 13:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

ACC

{{help}} My account is presently suspended from it; could someone with access to ACC please tell me what happened? Whatever mistake I made, I promise not to repeat it. --Dylan620 Wishes you a Happy Easter! 19:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

The suspend message said wait for me to contact you :P . See below. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Account Creation Interface

Hi!

I've just noticed a request that's come in for User:Dxb543 from 86.96.226.88, which you dropped, and I'd like to know the reason behind this, especially as several other people can find nothing that would prevent account creation for that request. I also noticed that you have been dealing with requests extremely quickly, and am growing very concerned that you might be racing to complete requests, and not checking requests properly, or jumping to conclusions. Please can you reassure me that this is not the case, and give reasoning behind this drop.

I've suspended your access to the interface so we can address these issues before continuing.

Regards,

Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I will gladly explain my actions on ACC. I dropped that IP's request because I saw vandalism/unconstructive editing from that IP mere minutes before the request was made. (Or at least I thought that edit was vandalism.) At the time (the IP is public), I thought that public IP's meant trouble; they do mostly vandalize, and it is said on the header, "expect vandal requests, and drop them when you see them." As such, I dropped the request. But now I realize that this is invalidated if the IP is public; any person from that IP could be requesting an account. It seems that I have a habit of reviewing accounts quickly – I always thought that this speed was OK (although, I assure you that I was reviewing every option for review for every account that I reviewed). In the future, I will assess requests at ACC slower and more carefully. Although, I would prefer that my suspension stand until tomorrow, as I feel like I could use a refreshing break from ACC.
On an unrelated side note; Happy Easter, Stwalkerster. :)
Dylan620 Wishes you a Happy Easter! 21:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, you have to remember that IP addresses are likely to be shared. The "vandal requests" notice was mainly referring to stuff which is actually covered by upolicy as well, and also known sock-puppeteers, so it does help to have a working knowledge of that too. (Grawp is mainly caught automatically now, but you still get ones like Hamish Ross, and others that still hang around). As long as you slow down, that's fine. I'll unsuspend you, but you don't have to come back until tomorrow if you don't want to (I'm about to run a software upgrade anyway). Oh, and Happy Easter to you too :) Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Some more help, please?

{{help}} I'm trying to code User:Dylan620 Bot/Message to link to the "delete" button, but Special:Delete doesn't exist. Then I found out that in order to delete my userpage, the URL would be http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dylan620&action=delete. How could I code the message template (i.e. {{{1}}}) to be able to cooperate with this type of URL? --Dylan620 Efforts · Toolbox 18:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

try http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{{1}}}&action=delete J.delanoygabsadds 18:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Got it, underscores were needed. --Dylan620 Efforts · Toolbox 19:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
FWIW, you should use {{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=delete}}, since that will automatically encode the article title correctly, and point to the correct server (https/http). Cheers, Amalthea 16:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Chirp!

That's otter for Thanks for the food. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 20:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Truco's Day

Oh-em-gee! Thanks so much, I really appreciate it, I never thought I would get my own day :)--Truco 01:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Also is there a userbox that I can add to my userpage? A small one though?--Truco 01:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

GREEN MEN / ZYZYTS

They actually are called Zyzyts. It is their name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.115.24 (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks a lot man. I really appreciate it, and it means a lot. :) — neuro(talk)(review) 01:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

ACC help requested

{{helpme}} I'm currently dealing with a request that has the word "Wiki" in its name, see [1]. Is this against policy? --Dylan620 Efforts · Toolbox 00:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I think it is, but I am not sure. I am going to leave this open in case I am wrong, but I am pretty sure that it is against policy....but please don't quote me. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 16, 2009 @ 00:41
I wouldn't have created it myself, but someone else already has. I don't think it's strictly against policy, but is something to be avoided if it can be helped. Now that the account exists, though, it's probably not worth worrying about. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Many users have Wiki in their names. It's only against policy if it insinuates any sort of authority. ∗ \ / (⁂) 10:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

...for fixing my talk page. That was very nice of you :)


--Naha|(talk) 00:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks for the flower! :) --Dylan620 Efforts · Toolbox 00:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

I pollute this cat too often :P

{{help}} Should I approve a request at ACC if the IP is rangeblocked for a year? --Dylan620 Efforts · Toolbox 00:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

There isn't really a simple answer to this question. Most of the time it is "no", but if you are unsure you should ask someone else for help. There isn't a deadline for handling the requests; if someone has to wait a bit longer for their account it is not the end of the world. — Jake Wartenberg 00:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Apology for an oversight

I created an account on ACC which I did not know you were handling. I went ahead and marked the request "Done." I apologize for any inconvenience. Willking1979 (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Your request for bot approval

Hi, your request for approval for Dylan620 Bot is still open. If you are still working on it, can you post a note indicating your current status? Otherwise, do you mind if the request is closed? Thanks. Wronkiew (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: Happy Garden's Day!

Gee, thanks Dylan! To be called a sane admin is a rare and unexpected honour :) Thanks again!  GARDEN  08:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Orly? Heh, I am rather enigmatic.  GARDEN  11:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Oooh, wheee! My day today, :-)

Hi Dylan! Thanks ever so much! What a nice, sunny day it is here for it to be my day, ;-) Merci! Maedin\talk 06:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

EddieSegoura Ban Appeal

For your information, a discussion has been opened at WP:AN#EddieSegoura Ban Appeal regarding an issue you may be involved in. Your comments are invited. Thank you! For the Arbitration Committee, Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/andrewrp

I noticed that you both opposed and snow-closed this RfA. For the record, while what you did won't do any harm, it's best not to close any RfA (or any discussion) that you've taken a position in, as it's technically a conflict of interest to do so (imagine an admin voting "keep" in an AfD, and then closing the debate as "keep"...it's inappopriate). This is not a warning, and don't consider it one: it's a just a note. Best wishes. Acalamari 20:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I was afraid something like this would come up. Thanks for the note, Dylan620 Efforts · Toolbox 21:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC).
Don't worry about it. :) In this case, it wasn't a big deal, and no harm has or will be done, nor does it stop you from closing snowed RfAs in the future. Best wishes. Acalamari 21:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi. Thanks for making April 22nd Nz26 Day!. Im very flattered lol - nz26 Talk | Contribs | Email | Editor Review 23:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks very much for your kind bestowment! Icestorm815 • Talk 00:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for noticing that my signature didn't link to my userpage. I haven't used the exact example you supplied, but used it to help me link it to my page, so thanks! Fahrenheit 15:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dylan620/Archives/2009/April&oldid=1147975931"