User talk:EClerxGlobal

Username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "EClerxGlobal", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

EClerxGlobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

ShrutiatEclerx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

to follow username policy

Decline reason:

That would be fine as a new username, but your username is only one very small aspect of the block. You need to address your deeply inappropriate edits that violated WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID, and tell us what edits you will make instead now that you know that, in the short term, you will not be permitted to edit about your company. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EClerxGlobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am trying to add the details about the organization eClerx, products & services, more informative details which will be helpful to readers. Content is not promotional, and it is updated information. Kindly help unlock me so I can contribute to Wikipedia. I will surely obey the policy guidelines & policy while editing the content. EClerxGlobal (talk) 19:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The content you attempted to add is completely promotional. A mission statement and a vision statement? A link beckoning people to come to your website? Cutting and pasting from your website? So, no. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We have no interest in what a company's representatives wish to say about it. We care about only what reliable sources that are independent of the company have chosen on their own to publish about it, without any inducement. Your edits removed sourced info and replaced it with company-authored, promotional material. What you have called "infomative details" we say "yes, it is promotion". --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

EClerxGlobal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why I am blocked. I included the mission & vision of the company, which looks promotional. Going forward, I will make sure content will not look promotional & will contribute to Wikipedia, which are dependent on reliable sources.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understood why I am blocked. I included the mission & vision of the company, which looks promotional. Going forward, I will make sure content will not look promotional & will contribute to Wikipedia, which are dependent on reliable sources. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understood why I am blocked. I included the mission & vision of the company, which looks promotional. Going forward, I will make sure content will not look promotional & will contribute to Wikipedia, which are dependent on reliable sources. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understood why I am blocked. I included the mission & vision of the company, which looks promotional. Going forward, I will make sure content will not look promotional & will contribute to Wikipedia, which are dependent on reliable sources. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I fixed your request so it displays properly(you were missing a bracket). Someone else will review it, but you have not yet told "us what edits you will make instead now that you know that, in the short term, you will not be permitted to edit about your company". If your only interest here is in editing about your company, this is likely the end of the road. 331dot (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit & contribution to reader will not be restricted to company. I usually read about the GenAI, data analytics & would like to contribute the information in these areas. EClerxGlobal (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]