Jump to content

User talk:EaseofUsePal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fallout: New Vegas. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Get on the talk page and stop giving IPs inappropriate warnings. -- ferret (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm very sorry, but I think that you have misunderstood the sequence of events with these edits. As far as I understand I followed Wikipedia protocol for dispute resolution to the letter:

I made a post on the Talk page discussing my issues with the mod section's length. Nobody replied their disagreement, so a few days later I made the edit to shorten the section. This IP User not only just reverts my edits without going to the talk page, but actually expands that section, leading me to believe that this IP User is somehow involved with The Frontier and wants their mod to have a lot of discussion on the page. So, I warned him about edit warring, because he didn't go on the Talk page where I *weeks ago* began this process.

Also re: your reversion reason and reply to my Talk page - if I incorrectly removed sources that was a pure mistake, I simply tried to move them when I removed the completely unnecessary details about why people had issues with this mod. I promise I am not at all biased towards or against these mods, it's just SO ridiculous to me how much comparatively longer that section is. EaseofUsePal (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The IP editor does not have to go to the talk page before reverting your edits. They made a single revert, which is not an edit war, making the 3RR warning wholly unwarranted. Please read WP:BRD. You made an edit boldly, it was reverted, at that point you should discuss further, not start reverting back to what you want. -- ferret (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Thank you for filling me in on what I did wrong; apologies for bothering you. EaseofUsePal (talk) 23:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]