User talk:Ebong abd
Welcome!
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of We teach life, sir, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://zahrasummayah.wordpress.com/2014/08/28/we-teach-life-sir-rafeef-ziadah-gaza-palestine/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Stub tags
[edit]Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like Ras Munif which already has a subject-specific stub tag, in this case {{Jordan-geo-stub}}. Thanks. PamD 18:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Sections
[edit]No, an article with one sentence such as Jorge Wilson does not need to be divided into sections (nor, of course, to have {{stub}} added when it already has {{Argentina-fieldhockey-bio-stub}}). There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it's an interesting journey. Happy Editing! PamD 19:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Editor abcdef. Your recent edit to the page Army of Revolutionaries appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 12:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sultan Murad Division, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- I removed some of your edits from the history; I will paste a template below with a copyvio warning. In the meantime, I urge you to start explaining your edits, esp. in areas governed by discretionary sanctions. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
--NeilN talk to me 19:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Note that not providing a reason for repeated removals of material is disruptive editing and can lead to editing sanctions. --NeilN talk to me 19:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sultan Murad Division, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 02:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Cocohead781. I noticed that in this edit to Osman I, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cocohead781 (talk) 22:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please do not add unsourced statements such as "Some pro Hindutva sources..." and "This reference unequivocally proves..." to the article. You're free to add statements that are actually supported by the cited references. utcursch | talk 20:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio and other problems
[edit]Please do not copy-paste content from other websites, as you did in Refugees of the Syrian Civil War and European migrant crisis. This is a serious violation. The journal article you cited is interesting, but you should only add at most a a one-sentence summary in at most one of these Wikipedia articles (because they are already too long, unfortunately).
Also please do not mark such edits as "minor". Tokenzero (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:European Politics and Society (Journal)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:European Politics and Society (Journal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rpep21. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)