User talk:Eddie2512

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lee Mills, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peanut4 (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read, re-read and re-re-read and that is fair enough.

Your forbearance is appreciated.

December 2012

Hello, I'm DUCKISJAMMMY. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rafael Benítez because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 06:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bruiser (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bruiser (film) was changed by Eddie2512 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881392 on 2014-05-01T17:53:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm LongLiveMusic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Oleksiy Cherednyk because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. LongLiveMusic (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Mills. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

In a recent edit to the page September 11 attacks, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop adding your face or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Milan Baroš. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]