User talk:Eddie891/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 20

16:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

RD1 request

I'm looking at the RD1 request forMecodema mohi. it looks to me like the source material: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BBD0260243B74790FBB795E93EFEE4

Is identified as public domain.

You think I'm missing something?--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Sphilbrick, you are absolutely right, my mistake :( thanks for catching it! I’m just getting back into npp and forgot to check the status thoroughly enough. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Eddie891, np, I do a lot of copyright work, and miss it myself on occasion. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Canadian Senators Group unbolding and unlinking of same page links

Hi Eddie891,

I have seen Wikipedia articles that link to the article in question, which display not as links but as bolded inline text. To my way of thinking, this is helpful to the user. So, while I am fine with you removing the numeric equivalent of the Senators in parentheses, as I wasn't sure if that was preferred or not, I'm just wondering why many editors link to the article on the same page and many do not? There seems to be no consistent standard here—at least one that is not consistently applied.

Note: To keep this conversation together, please reply here.

- --Doug Mehus (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Dmehus, Perhaps you are referring to this edit? If so, it doesn't make sense to link to the Canadian Senators Group on the page Canadian Senators Group, because it just takes readers to the same article. As far as I know, the article is never linked on its own page, unless you are linking to a sub page. The first instance of the articles title is generally bolded, but sometimes is not if there is no easily laid out subject, as is the case on pages such as History of Microsoft, where it is impractical to say 'the history of Microsoft begins..." and instead can just begin "Microsoft is a...". If I didn't answer your question, please let me know. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Eddie891 Yeah, I believe that's the one, but when you wikilink the same page, the MediaWiki software, as I understand it, automatically does not make that link a link; rather it just bolds it. I definitely get the rationale for unlinking if it did make it a link, as that'd make it a double-redirect. I have seen instances where the same page links to itself on the first instance and others where it does not. So, it's unclear which method is correct or, in any case, whichever method is correct is not being consistently applied, it seems to me. Anyway, thanks for your reply and comments. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Dmehus, I'd say that the most common method is bolding the first instance. You are right in that a link to the same page will display simply as bold text. I've personally never actually seen the page being linked rather than bolded. Happy editing! Eddie891 Talk Work 21:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Eddie891, Okay, sounds good. Thanks for the reply. :) Doug Mehus (talk) 21:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2019)

The Coleco Gemini video game console, a console clone of the Atari 2600 produced by Coleco in 1983
Hello, Eddie891.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Coleco Gemini

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Concert • Audience


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for George R. Proctor

On 13 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George R. Proctor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that botanist George R. Proctor collected more than 55,000 specimens, had 31 species named after him, and was convicted of a conspiracy to murder his wife? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George R. Proctor. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, George R. Proctor), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2019)

The National Museum is a Czech museum institution intended to systematically establish, prepare, and publicly exhibit natural scientific and historical collections. It was founded in 1818 and is located in Prague.
Hello, Eddie891.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

National Museum (Prague)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Coleco Gemini • Concert


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

20:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2019)

The steam hammer is a type of hammer
Hello, Eddie891.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hammer

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: National Museum (Prague) • Coleco Gemini


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

William Verbeck

FYI

--evrik (talk) 04:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

16:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147


Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11

Giving thanks

Thanksgiving
Cassia javanica, Torremolinos
... with thanks from QAI

Happy Thanksgiving! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

16:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William Verbeck

Hello! Your submission of William Verbeck at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you ...

Vision in 2020
missing Brian

... for improving article quality in December! There's a peer review open for Clara Schumann and a FAC for Jauchzet, frohlocket!, DYK? We miss Brian who would have helped. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

20:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

Fake achievements by Kingdom of the Two Sicilies

Hi there! I’m writing just to let you know that in Italy, since 2011, some Neo-borobonic (“neoborbonici”) associations, smallest parties and (non scholars) authors are publishing books with a list of (fake) achievements held by the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies in order to appear a lost rich and powerful country (e.g. the fake claims to be the 3rd most powerful country of Europe, recognized even at the Paris expo). Moreover this fake list is being copied and pasted on several websites and social media networks as well for the same nostalgic purpose. Please be aware. Thank you. --Nicola Romani (talk) 00:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

P.S. those neoborbonici tried as well to insert this fake achievements on Italian Wikipedia related pages. --Nicola Romani (talk) 00:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nicola Romani Thanks for letting me know- I will keep my eyes open Eddie891 Talk Work 01:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imperium in Imperio has been accepted

Imperium in Imperio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Wishing you a happy 2020

Happy New Year!
Eddie891,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.


   – 2020 is a leap yearnews article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

Chris Troutman (talk) 12:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Historia rerum ubique gestarum has been accepted

Historia rerum ubique gestarum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

21:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Prague Castle skeleton

On 9 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prague Castle skeleton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that under Nazi German pressure, Ivan Borkovský identified the Prague Castle skeleton as a Nordic burial, and under Soviet occupation as a Slavic burial? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Prague Castle skeleton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Dr. Blofeld CCI cleanup effort

Hello. You are invited to join the Dr. Blofeld CCI cleanup effort, a project which aims to cleanup and resolve the largest copyright investigation on the site. Directions on how to help are at the main cleanup page. It is ok if you choose not to assist, as a large number of people are already helping out – but your contributions would be appreciated, even if you make just a few. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷Talk💸Help out at CCI! 00:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

19:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for William Verbeck

On 10 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Verbeck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Verbeck, who served as Adjutant General of the New York National Guard, was born to Dutch missionaries in Nagasaki, Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Verbeck. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Verbeck), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

January
... with thanks from QAI

thank you for improving articles in January! Today - 20 in 2020 - is a birthday, she is pictured on the lower choir pic, enjoy listening. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:44, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Your input is requested

at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Community view before Friday.

Only 100 or so words. It should be fun and serious at the same time.

All the best,

Smallbones(smalltalk) 00:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

18:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

20:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12

19:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Eddie891,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Lengua reminder
For a year ago nominating someone else as a awesome Wikipedians, I award you with this image of a taco. May it fuel your hunger while you continue to recognize others for their efforts to improve content on Wikipedia. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 19:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

20:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team