User talk:Editorlanpao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Editorlanpao, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Editorlanpao! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 22:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 16:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lukanand Kshetrimayum moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Lukanand Kshetrimayum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon If a submission is declined at review, please do not move it to mainspace without submitting to further review. This is an 'out of process' move and may be interpreted as an attempt to subvert the review system. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you disrupt the review process for a fourth time it is not likely to be viewed favourably by the wider Wikipedia community and could lead to the loss of editing privileges. Eagleash (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lukanand Kshetrimayum (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

The statement "The film was widely appreciated by the audience and film critics" should not be in the lede paragraph in the voice of Wikipedia, and is characteristic of submissions that are intended to praise the subject rather than to describe them neutrally.

This draft has now bee declined seven times and moved from article space back to draft space twice, by six reviewers. These included six declines for the lack of footnotes, a pattern that makes it clear that this editor does not take advice and is not interested in working collaboratively with other editors. This submission is Rejected this time. There is no value to trying to explain to the submitter what needs to be done. If a neutral editor wants to develop a draft on this person, then can discuss and can obtain a rough consensus. If the author continues to try to resubmit, a topic-ban may be requested.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ksh l—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ksh l. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]