User talk:Edward Blaze

William Styron - interview

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as William Styron - interview, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from {{{url}}}. As a copyright violation, William Styron - interview appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. William Styron - interview has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:William Styron - interview. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at William Styron - interview, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Bubba hotep 14:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Tag removal notice

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Bubba hotep 14:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion

With Proposed Deletion the rules are a little different. The process is designed to simplify uncontested deletions. All you need do is remove the proposed deletion tags if you wish to contest it. Be aware that other editors then have the option of taking it to a full debate through Articles for Deletion, which normally allows for five days of debate with the editing community. (Legal requirements of copyright issues may cause an early close and deletion, but an administrator with more knowledge of those rules would need to determine that.) Fan-1967 16:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Confusion

I'm in need of clarification: are you saying that you are William E. Marks - the author of the original interview article, or that you are merely the author of the Wikipedia article? Also, is the interview not the copyright of Telemedia's Channel 8? These are the issues which need to be cleared up before any decision is made. Bubba hotep 16:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Answer to "confusion" Bubba - thanks for your question. YES, I am saying that I am William E. Marks, author of the "original" interview article. "Edward Blaze" are my middle two names that are functional for your website. As I just stated on the "Talk:William Styron - interview" page, Telemedia was a cable provider on the island of Martha's Vineyard that provided a community access channel for people on the island to produce and present their own programs. As creator/producer/host of The Vineyard Voice program - I possess all the rights. The William Styron interview article I published in Martha's Vineyard Magazine came out several months after I interviewed Bill on my show. Also, I am the Founder of Martha's Vineyard Magazine, and was the magazine's publisher and editor at the time I published the interview. Bubba - please advise as to how we may forward from this juncture. Edward Blaze 18:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)William E. Marks aka Edward Blaze.

I think your assertion that you own the copyright to the interview is enough - for now. The only reason I put the speedy deletion tag on it was because it was not clear (not your fault, I hasten to add). I'm sure you can appreciate, there are alot of people just copying and pasting articles from other sites on here (and that goes for transcripts of any interview material also) and each one has to be looked at closely. However - I am not yet in a position to comment on the context of the article or the material worth of it (mainly because I don't know the subject too well). At present it does not link anywhere else on Wikipedia, neither does anything link to it. I'm not sure where it would fit into the whole scheme of things - and that in no way is meant to degrade the content or the subject, (or the author, come to think) - I must stress. I simply do not know! It may well be that a panel of editors would have to look at it in a process called Articles for Deletion - for all its titular forboding, a very fair process (in my opinion). I think I will look into it more and will get back to you. In the meantime, thanks for the contribution and the very best to you. Bubba hotep 19:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Alternative

It has also been suggested that the best place for this is on Wikipedia's sister project Wikisource which specialises in source text. May be worth considering? Bubba hotep 21:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Alternative - revisited

Thanks for the suggestion - I will explore "Wikisource". I also see you have another page in the Wikipedia relative to William Styron with his photograph - perhaps a link will work there. To quote a recent obit on Styon's death of last week - "William Styron is considered one the great writers of the 20th century." Curious how Wikipedia also expresses a list of quotes from Styron. And, here you have my interview filled with profound quotes relative to the art of writing; writers' rights; freedom of speech, and rare information about Styron's personal writing technique and how and where he acquired his desk. Fine with me if you want to dump my submission. However, in my opinion - you and your readers are losing an opportunity. Edward Blaze 01:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)William E. Marks

I wouldn't see it as losing an opportunity, as such. Hi, again, by the way. I would actually see it as "casting them in stone". A source for which anyone can retrieve to quote. On Wikipedia, they are more concerned with the cold hard facts. I hope you understand the reasoning. The fact is - it is wanted and deemed valuable. Bubba hotep 01:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Moving onward

Okay, Bubba - thank you for your guidance on how to move this exercise into a more positive space - literally and figuratively. Per your suggestion, I will pursue the placement of the "William Styron - interview" over to Wikipedia's sister source - Wikisource. In the interim - it appears as though you are allowing the interview to remain, perhaps temporarily, as a viable reference in Wikipedia. Perhaps you and your sister cross reference each other in an osmotic fashion - which will better serve your readers. Regardless, Wikipedia's effort is an interesting experiment at a curious time in history. Thanks again and many blessings, Edward Blaze 12:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Eisie--web.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eisie--web.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Nv8200p talk 17:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Dew_-_how_formed.pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dew_-_how_formed.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

your book ad

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page water do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bendž|Ť 10:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

References

Your effort to add references to articles is appreciated, but please:

1. Look over an article after you've edited it (or, better yet, use the preview button while you edit) to make sure you haven't created any broken links or templates.
2. Read the instructions for {{Cite web}}, and make sure you understand them. "citeweblurl" is not valid markup.

Thank you. — Paul A (talk) 02:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)