User talk:EllenSheehy

Your submission at Articles for creation

The Word Network, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Word Network

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Word Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, EllenSheehy. You have new messages at Talk:The Word Network.
Message added 17:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

EllenSheehy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am requesting reconsideration of a block on my account. I apologize for using more than one login. I've used this account recently to add references and update an article. I have created 3 accounts (I believe or it could be 2). I have changed emails several times over the past 8 years, PC's and logins for many accounts, but not with the intention of deception.I understand that Wikipedia monitors the contribution of all editors. I know my IP address is recorded. Using the auto sign off has not been a good habit. I have contributed under these accounts to either create or edit articles that I've written and ones I did not write. All with great respect for Wikipedia guidelines. My first 2 accounts haven't been used in many years. My other account was created from the same IP address but different PC. I did this because I don't have access to the email address from the first account and needed to reset my password. I am requesting that you please review my contributions and reconsider the block on my account. I will only use 1 account moving forward. I will also signin everytime I edit. This was not meant to be deceptive.I understand that Wikipedia tracks user IP's so I thought it was easier. I have also signed in from other locations, but I don't believe that is an issue. Thank you for considering my request. I would like to create an article for a man I greatly respect. Rabbi Steven Z. Leder. He is mentioned in an article for Wilshire Boulevard Temple, but I believe he meets the criteria for a standalone article.

Accept reason:

Tread lightly with WP:COI issues, but otherwise you're free to help out where needed. Vaya con dios. Jayron32 11:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

• Ellen, there are some additional concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bailey Rae/Archive whereby it has been suspected that you are editing Wikipedia for promotional reasons, that it is likely you are being paid in some manner, either for your job or as an independent contractor, to add promotional material to Wikipedia. You should read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and if you can, please address these concerns. Thanks! --Jayron32 19:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Jayron32Thank you for responding to my request. In September, I checked to see if there was an article for Rabbi Steven Leder. He is the subject of a documentary called Restoring Tomorrow. The documentary is about the restoration of Wilshire Boulevard Temple under Rabbi's direction. I want to create an article for Rabbi Leder. I asked his permission to write an article (out of respect), but he is not paying me any money at all to do this. I primarily focus on religious institutions or leaders so this is not unusual for me. My connection to the edit on Aaron Wolf's article was associated to the research I was doing on Rabbi Leder. I was searching Wikipedia for any possible mentions of him or Wilshire. There are very few, which surprised me because he is an important religious leader whose teachings I follow. He's also an author whose books I've read. I don't work for Aaron Wolf. I have never met him. He is however the producer of the documentary about Rabbi Leder. Aaron Wolf's Great Grandfather was Wilshire's Chief Rabbi from 1915 - 2004. Also, I would like to make an edit to correct errors in the dates listed for the terms of Wilshire's Rabbis listed in the Wilshire article. There are several errors. That is my sole interest in Aaron Wolf's article. Additionally, while I was looking for mentions of Rabbi Leder and/or Restoring Tomorrow, I also added an edit to the article for Wilshire Boulevard Temple because it didn't clearly identify that Rabbi Leder has been the senior Rabbi there for over 30 years. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify my interest in Aaron Wolf's article.EllenSheehy (talk) 19:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for that explanation. I'll be contacting the admin who blocked you to see if they have any further input on the matter. --Jayron32 10:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Question: Are User:Bailey Rae and User:LA lady9313 the accounts you've referred to above or are they not you? Also, the first article you created The Word Network seems very well formatted for a first time editor, or for someone who hasn't edited in a couple of years, do you have any comment on that? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Jayron32User Bailey Rae and LA lady9313 are not me. I created The Word Network on a Word document (which is easier for me to do so I can see my changes before I post it). That article was created so long ago that I had to go back and look at it to remember what my contributions were. The article that is currently published has had a substantial amount of new content added. I believe I edited this article a couple of times many years ago. I have not been consistently active. Thanks for circling back to me with an update when possible. I would like to create an article for Rabbi Leder.EllenSheehy (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

@Callanecc:: Since Callanecc is the checkuser here, they will have to respond. --Jayron32 18:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

@Jayron32: I'm happy with you unblocking based on what they've said. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Leder (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Basie was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Leder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steve Leder, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Basie (talk) 08:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, EllenSheehy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Basie (talk) 08:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Steve Leder has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Steve Leder. Thanks! Basie (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi EllenSheehy! You created a thread called Waiting for 4 months to have a new article approved at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Leder has been accepted

Steve Leder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:46, 2 November 2018 (UTC)