This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Please refrain from using insulting nicknames or making comments such as calling a living individual a "shrew" - it has no place in producing quality articles and is not conductive to what we do here and indeed goes against a number of our key policies (and against the spirit of BLP). --Fredrick day (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
This matter has been referred to WP:ANI. I would confirm that it is inappropriate to include contentious material in biographies of living people unless it is referenced by reliable third party sources, per WP:BLP. It is also uncivil to disparage other editors who are pointing out such concerns with edits. I recommend you address these matters if you wish to continue interacting on this website/encyclopedia. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:BLP covers article talkpages too, per this. Also, replied at WP:ANI. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Also, please refrain from making personal attacks at other editors, including name-calling. It's unnecessary and it's not productive. Comment on the content of Wikipedia. Not those who edit it. Regards, Lara❤Love 20:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Any more edits like this will get you a block. John Reaves 14:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
...You know, them chains ain't medals. You get 'em for makin' mistakes. And you make a bad enough mistake and then you gotta deal with the man - and he is one rough old boy.--EndlessDan 15:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay then, you're blocked. John Reaves 16:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh come on. Stop beatin' it. Get out there yourself. Stop feedin' off me. Get out of here.--EndlessDan 16:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Don't hit me anymore...Oh God, I pray to God you don't hit me anymore. I'll do anything you say, but I can't take anymore.
Decline reason:
Your unblock request makes no sense. You have been blocked for personal attacks, including deliberate personal attacks in edit summaries; in particular, for this and this. Request to unblock denied; please wait until it expires (and don't make any more attacks while you are blocked). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wish you'd stop bein' so good to me, cap'n.--EndlessDan 17:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Dude.
WTF? I came here to congratulate your Wunderteam, what's with the block? Over a pro wrestler? And what's with the ambiguous quotes? Not the stone cold chillin I've come to expect and enjoy. What gives? Keeper | 76 16:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Good salad dressing. Especially like the ranch, very creamy. Sorry you hafta sit out a block. FWIW, IMHO, it could have easily been avoided, and I can completely understand if you're frustrated and I believe you put forward a very good rationale for justifying your comments (the paragraph that started with nah, it's principal) You shoulda done that right off instead of going all quote-y and ambiguous and namecalling. Here's how I see it: 1. Fredrick day seriously overreacted to your comment which was, IMO, meant casually, probably humorously. If he had looked at your userpage, usertalk, usercontribs, he'd have easily seen that you are a casual dude that calls things as they are, including self-deprecation, and knockin' your own teams and fanboy stuff equally and without bias. You didn't exactly call her a Nazi, and you didn't do it on her article, or her talk page for that matter, but on a WikiProject talkpage. 2. You overreacted and called the person who overreacted (Fredrick day) a nerd, even though I admit his response to you about "acting like a child" was incivil at best. But he didn't like you calling a pro wrestler a shrew (thin skin) and so you call him a nerd? Not stone cold chillin. That's followed with some rather ambiguously cool quotes, none of which do much but make people say WTF and then block. I still think you're cool. You had a great Sunday evening in real life, you've really pissed off the packerfans that drool all over my office, and I'm jealous of your futbol team and hope they obliterate the patriots. Cheers, dude. Chill out. Keeper | 76 19:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Peyton and eli.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.redcross.org/article/0,1072,0_332_4559,00.html (says "All rights reserved"; Red Cross is not part of the U.S. Government). As a copyright violation, Image:Peyton and eli.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Peyton and eli.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Peyton and eli.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Peyton and eli.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Peyton and eli.jpg]].
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Davepape (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eli Ny post 04.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eli Ny post 04.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
SummerSlam (1994) and Royal Rumble (2005) have been listed for Peer review. Please review these articles and make suggestions on how they can be improved before they are nominated for Good Article status. Their respective peer reviews can be found here and here.
NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members.
Several wrestling news sites report that former Total Nonstop Action Wrestling stars Ron Killings and Chris Harris have been in talks with WWE. In addition The Big Show is said to be returning as well. Be on the look out for unsourced claims of these signing being added to their respective articles as well as the WWE Roster article.
The focus on improving Stub-class articles is continuing to pay off, as the number of stubs has reduced from 717 to 706 over the past two weeks. The goal for this week is to get it down to 700, so please check out the stub article subpage to see what you can help with.
You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options:
Delivered: 17:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
