User talk:Eswnav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Eswnav, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - Timbaaa -> ping me 14:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that in this edit to Nikki Galrani, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 02:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Priya Bhavani Shankar, you may be blocked from editing. This content you removed on the basis that it was in the infobox. The infobox is supposed to summarise content found elsewhere in the article, not to be the sole repository for the content. Further, you removed the reference, which is unjustifiable. In this edit you removed content claiming that it was unsourced, yet it was sourced. What is your justification for that? These edits are indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rekha Krishnappa (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:
The early life section is entirely unsourced, the career section is also unsourced and not written from a natural point of view (we don't need to mention who she has worked with) and some internal links are not correct. Please fix these issues before submitting for another review.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GSS 💬 08:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Eswnav! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Rekha Krishnappa, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rekha Krishnappa (July 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails to demonstrate how it satisfies the requirements of WP:NACTOR. Noting that blogsites, such as Wordpress and sites such as IMDb are not acceptable or reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Eswnav! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rekha Krishnappa (August 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
no improvement since previous decline
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adigaram 79 (August 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement made
David.moreno72 07:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rekha Krishnappa (August 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is unlikely to be suitable for Wikipedia. There is no notability here.

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Times of India's entertainment news does not qualify as a reliable source
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 12:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Hi, to improve Draft:Rekha Krishnappa, we need additinal verifications like references. Correct references made a perfect article, so try to give additional verification. by User:Yamihtherocks

No, i dont know about the person Rekha Krishnappa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamihtherocks (talk • contribs) 05:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vani Bhojan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suresh Krishna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Asin into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 16:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shvedh (September 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NCOMPANY. Requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing) about the film company itself not the films that it has produced. Noting IMDb, Facebook and Twitter are not acceptable or reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cinema of India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not POV push your personal preferences without discussion. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir Eswnav (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK. You need to discuss after your initial revert as per our policy WP:BRD, instead of reverting. Besides, the arrangement is now as per the source, which unwittingly has become as per your preference . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Are you upload images in Wikimedia? Eswnav (talk) 17:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That YouTube link video convert into images. Eswnav (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would violate WP:COPYVIO guidelines. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Simran (actress) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 17:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Circumvention of AFC[edit]

Why are you trying to circumvent the AFC process by creating Thazh Thiravaa? You haven't demonstrated that the subject is notable. Do you get paid if you can create an article in live space or something? Also, you have to stop doing copy/paste page moves. If you copy/paste something from one Wikipedia article to another, you have to provide proper copyright attribution. See WP:CWW, and I strongly recommend you fix you mistakes across the various articles that you've copy/pasted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this after I not do like that. Eswnav (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eswnav, You're still doing it - [1]. Please be patient and wait like every other draft creator does. Ravensfire (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Eswnav (talk) 04:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vani Bhojan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tollywood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits[edit]

These edits are not constructive. Nobody is required to clean up after you, so you need to double-check your work before saving it to an article. Your changes added a duplicate |awards= parameter, you added two signatures for some odd reason, and you deleted the Filmography section for some reason only you seem to understand, since I also notice that you failed each time to leave an edit summary. What's the deal? Maybe you should edit more slowly. If you continue to make sloppy mistakes like this, I imagine you'll wind up with your editing privileges interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raadhika filmography moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Raadhika filmography, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 1292simon (talk) 07:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vani Bhojan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sun TV, Seema and Sulakshana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Tamil film actresses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambika.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✅Done Eswnav (talk) 07:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion[edit]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Cyphoidbomb[edit]

Hello, Eswnav. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
Message added 14:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

There is a discussion about your editing at this article, specifically your overuse of images. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Eswnav (talk) 03:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anitha Sampath for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anitha Sampath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anitha Sampath (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide edit summaries[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Vikram Vincent 11:17, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Are you mad Fan of Vani Bhojan?[edit]

Why are you keep making unwanted things to an article?? This is not a platform to encourage your fanmoment or Fan based Edits ? Please stop adding irrelevant and unimportant things to Vani Bhojan.She is one of the New comer in the industry.Don't spoil the page by adding it Unwanted things additionally..Next time I will report these to Admins.We are not here to promote the brand that you think (Vani) Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 03:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What ever, I'm not a mad fan of Vani Bhojan you clear that. You are against to me. Like you treat me Eswnav (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still after Vani Bhojan?? Please Don't Make further Edits[edit]

Hi Eswnav,

Understand what you are doing is only a fan Edits and mad edits, because of the following reasons

  • You are always after her page,even for a simple & minute thing,With continuous focus on her only..
  • Dedication and Fan admiration is good But here is not a place to Brand any of those favourite Actors or Actresses.What an article reQuires is enough
  • You are still seeking multilple no.of Images of Vani Bhojan to different editors like Veera Narayana & others including me.
  • You only added Actress Vani Bhojan's name and details among List of Indian television actresses .you even added her image multiple times.Why couldn't you add other famous and veteran Serial actresses from South India????????,Also when i added South Indian artists names and images in the same article you just removed all those ones.List of Indian Television doesn't mean North Indian Hindi actresses only.It also includes south indian actresses from Malayalam,Tamil etc...
  • Even you mentioned my name over several pages without understanding why i cleared out unnecessary contents.
  • Also you keeps removing what relevant content am providing for some articles with significance, for silly reasons.. as a revenge ?????Veteran actresses are more popular and experienced than young generation's actresess..you just replaced young actresses in place of veteran actresses in article List of Indian film actresses.
  • You only branding Actress Vani Bhojan in some artciles like List of Indian Television / Serial Actresses , Oh My Kadavule Movie ,etc..


I Edited it in a very neat and short way.You expanded her article (keep doing it now too), mostly with unwanted and unecessary things.Try to Understand it.Don't be a mad Fan of her's. Please don't edit further more.Be a Good Wikipedian and Edtor.Even Kailash29792 agrees with me on my Edits, Thanks Kailash29792.Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit-warring at Vani Bhojan[edit]

If you keep edit-warring at Vani Bhojan, I'm going to prohibit you from editing that article. Go to the talk page and discuss the issues one by one. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sun Kudumbam Viruthugal for Best Actress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandhini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deepika Padukone[edit]

I recently changed Image of Padukone twice to versiom which saws her face clearly but you seems to revert them again and again Dont be so stupid The face of Subject is more important and This photo shows her face Clearly Now for God sake dont revert my edits again.Thanks. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Galatta Nakshatra Awards[edit]

Hello, Eswnav

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Galatta Nakshatra Awards for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Galatta Nakshatra Awards[edit]

Seriously? You created an article about the Galatta Nakshatra Awards just so you could fluff up the Vani Bhojan article? When someone tries to circumvent community guidelines by gaming the system, it makes them look like they are only here to promote an agenda. Further, your efforts to insert this content into the article are a bit ridiculous, since the award you're trying so desperately to include "TV actor who made it to the silver screen (Female)". That's not even remotely close to "Best Actor" or similar. You might as well brag that she got an award for wearing a blue dress. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rekha Krishnappa (November 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 22:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Again You - The Mad Fan after Vani Bhojan[edit]

@Eswnav: What's wrong with you Are you this kind of mad fan boy of Vani Bhojan????Are you mad?????why are you after her..again, again and again?????Look this is not a Platform to highlight your favorite people.You have even made Galatta Nakshatra Awards page only for her.This one and each of your concern about her is a kind of Madnedsss.I haven't done anything wrong..but cleared out the mistakes..Why you always nurturing with more highlights in it.She's a Just a new actress...Not veteran in film industry..but you make her as only one Heroine at the Top.Please Understand your madness over her and realise that it's not a platform to show your fanism to her.Make a facebook page or instagram page instead of that..Wikipedia have it's own better standards.Please be a Good Editor atleast.

Riya Iyer S Menon (talk) 05:06,28 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Vani Bhojan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Both you and Riya Iyer S Menon need to stop edit warring on this article and on other articles (such as Meeku Maathrame Cheptha). Use the article talk pages to discuss the content, and do not attack the other editor even if you think they are wrong. Assume that they are trying to improve the encyclopedia just as much as you are, and only comment on content, not on other editors. bonadea contributions talk 23:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vani Bhojan; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 09:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Netrikann (2021 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Netrikann (2021 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netrikann (2021 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Photo of Priya Bhavani Shankar?[edit]

I guess the current picture depicting her is too old. Do you agree that there should be an updated picture here? Praveentech (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary reordering[edit]

Why in this edit and this edit and this edit and perhaps others do you keep putting Vani Bhojan at the front of the list? Since you don't use edit summaries consistently, and when you do they don't address the rationale behind these potentially controversial changes, I have no idea what your justification is. Since another editor has expressed a concern that you are here to engage in Vani Bhojan promotion, this sort of editing, especially repeatedly, is problematic, and it is something you could wind up being blocked for. So please explain yourself below. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I assume you have no plans to answer my question? I am strongly considering implementing a topic ban where you would not be allowed to edit topics related to Vani Bhojan. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[2] see the Twitter account Vani Bhojan played one of the female role sir. Eswnav (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, that is not a reliable source for anything, and more importantly, what does her role in Oh My Kadavule have to do with your persistant and unexplained changes to Sun Kudumbam Viruthugal for Best Actress? --bonadea contributions talk 08:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Eswnav, your reply doesn't answer the question at all. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Netrikann (2021 film)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Netrikann (2021 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netrikann (2021 film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 08:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If disagree with an article's deletion, the deletion review process is the correct way to discuss it, not recreating the article. If you continue to recreate without discussing, you may get blocked. --Michael Greiner 21:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My Kadavule[edit]

Please explain this edit. You say in the edit summary "Bhojan played a supporting role" while adding her name to the list of starring parts in the infobox. You also reordered the cast list in your next edit to put Bhojan's name higher. Why did you do that? --bonadea contributions talk 21:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Oh My Kadavule, you may be blocked from editing. You never responded to the above, but have added even more unsourced claims about Bhojan having a starring part in the film. bonadea contributions talk 10:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been making similar edits to several articles, reordering cast lists with no explanation, and adding Bhojan's name as a starring role where sources don't even mention her name. --bonadea contributions talk 10:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aaha (TV series). bonadea contributions talk 19:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thazh Thiravaa[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eswnav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thazh Thiravaa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paayum Oli Nee Yenakku[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eswnav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paayum Oli Nee Yenakku, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raadhika filmography (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Raadhika instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is already in Raadhika, as far as I can tell.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paayum Oli Nee Yenakku[edit]

Hello, Eswnav. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paayum Oli Nee Yenakku".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Galatta Nakshatra Awards[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eswnav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Galatta Nakshatra Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aranthangi Nisha[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eswnav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aranthangi Nisha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raadhika filmography[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eswnav. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raadhika filmography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raadhika filmography[edit]

Hello, Eswnav. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raadhika filmography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eswnav&oldid=1052734490"