Jump to content

User talk:Evansgreencore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conflict of interest notice

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Evansgreencore. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Your deceptive edit

[edit]

Hi Evansgreencore. You performed an edit to the Greencore article on 5 June 2021 which removed a valid and properly sourced paragraph, embarrassing to Greencore, and you used a deceptive edit summary to camouflage your purpose ("Update on corporate purpose"). This edit has been reverted. Future edits to this article, by any editor, will be watched with interest.O'Dea (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Evansgreencore. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Greencore, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Evansgreencore. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Evansgreencore|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dormskirk (talk) 11:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]