User talk:Evelynkwapong539

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Evelynkwapong539, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Evelynkwapong539, good luck, and have fun. Kaizenify (talk) 14:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lion King (2019 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Detective Pikachu (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Looney Tunes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transylvania 6-5000 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the Looney Tunes Cartoons edit. Unlike some people, you care about the Looney Tunes Bugs103 (talk) 12:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voice Actors[edit]

Evelynkwapong539, I am saying this for your own good do not commit more acts of vandalism Looney Jack 3.0 (talk) 23:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Deflating Planet[edit]

Hello, Evelynkwapong539,

Thank you for creating Deflating Planet.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 23:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Character Page[edit]

Hi,

I feel I am not reaching out to you clearly,

I can see you are dedicated to the LT Cartoons Character page, but I'm here to not be rude, but to defend why I am re-verting your edits

As this show is meant to be a series of shorts, it features multiple different Looney Tunes characters, with many characters being considered a protagonist. Yes Bugs is the most popular character, but is he the protagonist of shorts starring Porky and Daffy? Is he for shorts with Sylvester and Tweety? No, of course not, but what I am trying to say is that multiple characters are the protagonists of their own individual shorts. Your point with TV Tropes also doesn't make much sense because those have tropes relating to the characters from every piece of media created for multiple different TV shows and films. This page should only matter with how the characters appear in this show alone. Is Granny called Emma Webster in this specific show yet? No, she is just listed as Granny in the credits. Sylvester is never called Sylvester Pussycat as well. As for using Space Jam, I don't want to come off as rude but that is a wild miscalculation in judgement as you are comparing how characters appeared in a single film while this is a TV show that still has hundreds of shorts yet to be aired, each with their own self contained story and no continuity. If you have any counterpoints please feel free to show them, not just link to a TV Tropes page, please be specific. I hope you can understand where I'm coming from, Thanks!

99.44.117.168 15:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.44.117.168 (talk)

List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Evelynkwapong539! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This should redirect to the main list of characters and can otherwise be directly described in the main article if there is nothing to say that distinguishes this take from the original character.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Monkeybird2.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monkeybird2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Looney Tunes Cartoons episode[edit]

Template:Infobox Looney Tunes Cartoons episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 23:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Looney Tunes Cartoons (season 1); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
A pity that I have to warn you over this... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your attitude on Wikipedia is not civil or respective of other editors. You have not sought dispute resolution, even after being warned and you have claimed that you "have an advantage" simply because you have "created most of the articles relating to Looney Tunes Cartoons". Seek dispute resolution and accept that you are not always right. Wikipedia is based on community work and consensus. Your way is not always the best way. Thank you. Ed6767 (talk) 15:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Evelynkwapong539 reported by User:Ed6767 (Result: ). Thank you. Ed6767 (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Evelynkwapong539. I've posted at the noticeboard recommending you be blocked for edit warring. There may still be time for you to respond and agree to wait for consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. El_C 15:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Evelynkwapong53, please exercise restraint with edit summaries and make sure you adhere to Wikipedia's policy on civility. Thank you. El_C 15:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plunger (Looney Tunes Cartoons short) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Plunger (Looney Tunes Cartoons short), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Looney Tunes articles[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ElmerFuddwithPlunger.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ElmerFuddwithPlunger.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ElmerFuddwithPlunger.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:ElmerFuddwithPlunger.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 64 Zoo Lane. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 14:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 64 Zoo Lane, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 13:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evelynkwapong539! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 13:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Continued edit warring on cartoon-related articles[edit]

List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Evelynkwapong539. Following a 3RR case from June you've been reverting a lot on cartoon articles. It is fine to have an interest in this topic area, but when your changes are constantly being reverted that is a sign you should be using the talk pages to get support for your changes. There is a risk that an administrator might block you for long-term edit warring the next time you revert one of these articles, when there is no evidence that anyone else supports your changes. I became aware of this due to this complaint on my talk page by User:Noelephant. You can respond if you wish. It is still technically true that after 744 Wikipedia edits, you have never left a signed comment on an article talk page. Try it, it is helpful. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing regarding this topic is now under discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Evelynkwapong539. Please consider participating. --Izno (talk) 17:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Evelynkwapong539. Since you continued to revert on 16 July after my warning, and you did not make any response at ANI, I'm planning to block your account. Unless you have a better idea for resolving this. EdJohnston (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per continued warring on cartoon-related articles. After my last warning (above) you continued right on by making this revert. You aren't the owner of Wikipedia; you should listen to other editors. EdJohnston (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of articles[edit]

Something that I don't see has been addressed, or if it has you have ignored it is your perception that you somehow own List of Looney Tunes Cartoons characters because you created it. Please be under no misconception, nobody owns articles on Wikipedia. Any editor is free to edit any article regardless of who created it. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kath Soucie[edit]

You've been here for a year and a half, by now you should know that when you add information about a living person, you must support it with high quality, reliable sources (WP:BLP). This includes someone's date and place of birth. If you continue to violate the BLP policy, then I will block you. Sro23 (talk) 02:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned[edit]

Your edits have been mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#Looney Tunes Cartoons. If it becomes necessary to block your account again, it will probably be indefinite. EdJohnston (talk) 18:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evelynkwapong539, the replacement poster and editor are both currently under discussion, as the original promotional poster is valid for the article and does not require replacing. I'd also recommend you revert less, given that you're under a report for edit-warring, per the link above. -- /Alex/₂₁ 02:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes Cartoons (season 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Evelykwapong539. Do you intend to keep reverting indefinitely on Looney Tunes articles? Your last edit did not attach any source to back up your 'Season 1A' arguments. EdJohnston (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tig N’ Seek and the Fungies have split seasons, so why not Looney Tunes Cartoons as well!? Boy, you guys make me agitated!! 😡 Evelynkwapong539 (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Your recent editing history at Looney Tunes Cartoons shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are way over 3RR. @EdJohnston: may block you again if you do not immediately self-revert. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Characters[edit]

Please hear me out on this.

I understand you are enthusiastic about this show, but your constant reverts on the pages are not helping your case. There has been a couple other users who agree that there is no need to categorize and exclude the characters as well as categorize the season as "1A". There are valid sources that characters such as Pepe, Hubie and Bertie, and Taz that have confirmed voice actors and can be organized in a simple cast list. Your reasoning for categorizing characters does not make sense. Using the Tune Squad from Space Jam, a movie that is a completely different continuity, is not reliable in the slightest. This show is made of individual shorts, no need to label one character's importance over the other. It makes the article needlessly complicated. Categorizing the season into letters constantly without a valid source is also very disruptive and your reasoning "just beacuse other HBO Max Shows split seasons" is not reliable at all. I think this show was not going to be on HBO Max to begin with. Calling yourself the "biggest fan" of the show does not give you credibility to revert an article just because another user disagrees with you. You really need to take a step back and let other fans contribute to the article. I hope you can find peace with yourself and I hope you understand. Noelephant(talk) 21:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That’s it, I tried to tell the truth but you wouldn’t listen, so this is HAPPENNING!!! 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡Evelynkwapong539 (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Evelynkwapong539 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only trying to improve the Looney Tunes franchise until you all decided to derail it. I am very disgraced with you all! Evelynkwapong539 (talk) 22:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. $Salvio$ 22:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2020[edit]

Hi Evelynkwapong539! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 03:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time that I have had to warn you about marking edits as minor when they clearly are not. As regards your current block, you simply cannot keep edit-warring at articles. It doesn't matter if you think you are right, there is no excuse for it. If you have disagreements with other editors you need to discuss this on the article's talkpage and gain consensus. If you continue the way that you are, you're going to be blocked for longer and longer periods until you are blocked indefinitely. Like the request to stop marking all edits as minor, you cannot continue ignoring all of the warnings that you are given. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any further attempts at evading scrutiny regarding your edits will likely lead to your account being blocked indefinitely. This is your one chance to demonstrate you can edit collaboratively as is required here.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent socking/logged-out editing to avoid further sanctions on this account. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You, the individual behind the keyboard, are now blocked from editing Wikipedia from any IP or account. You can be unblocked once you post an appeal that demonstrates you understand how your editing has been disruptive and agree to stick to a single logged-in account to edit.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Orphaned non-free image File:FirehouseFrenzy.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FirehouseFrenzy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boo! Appetweet.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boo! Appetweet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LooneyTunesCartoonsSeason1.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LooneyTunesCartoonsSeason1.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marvin Flag for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marvin Flag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Flag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 19:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ElmerFuddwithaPlunger.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ElmerFuddwithaPlunger.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HarmWrestling.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HarmWrestling.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BigLeagueBeast.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BigLeagueBeast.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of Mini Elmer.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of Mini Elmer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeflatingPlanet.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeflatingPlanet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evelynkwapong539, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Noah ^💬 15:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Boo! Appetweet[edit]

Hello, Evelynkwapong539, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Lithopsian, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Boo! Appetweet, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boo! Appetweet.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lithopsian (talk) 18:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]