User talk:FAAHS

Concern regarding Draft:Mothparja[edit]

Hello, FAAHS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mothparja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mothparja[edit]

Hello, FAAHS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mothparja".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mothparjs (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mothparjs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mothparjs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FAAHS! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mothparja (village) has been accepted[edit]

Mothparja (village), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Mothparja ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help Kuru😀👍🙏 FAAHS (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I have added and improved this article with great help of you but still that it isn't correctly shown in Google search results like other Wikipedia articles. And Sir this article is still stub-class so please let me know how can I increase its level. FAAHS (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have a response to this help desk question.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I can answer the question about Google search results. The complicated explanation is here. The simple explanation is here. It will normally take 90 days to show up on Google.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition here has again added a reference to a clearly identified Wikipedia mirror. This appears to be one of the same ones you used earlier. Additionally, this reference is to a "book" that notes "this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online", making it also a circular reference. Please be more careful when evaluating references - these seem to be very clearly identified as sourced from Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 11:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my mistakes, I hadn't seen that those references were mirrors. And thank you for helping me and contributing on my article. Next time I will be more careful. And again Thank you a lot. FAAHS (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mothparja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 census. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sahito[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sahito requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 03:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi FAAHS! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Request for improvement of an Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FAAHS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.7.77.79. I don't use VPN an any other proxy changing service but except that my id is blocked many times please unblock it. Thanks. FAAHS (talk) 10:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed P2P proxy. Yamla (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sahito (July 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScottishFinnishRadish was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of these sources do not support the prose they are used for, and are not reliable anyway. Forebears.io does not have an entry for this name, and even if it did it would not support the prose about a "famous author." The original Sanskrit texts source does not mention Sahito or Sahita anywhere I can find, and no page number is provided for the citation. The development of Buddhism source also does not mention Sahito or Sahita, and is a thesis, not a reliable source. The Payot source lists it's sourcing as Wikipedia, so is not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sahito and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sahito, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sahito article[edit]

I noticed that your article is not supported by the references you have provided. All these references happen to be in English. Did you know that you may provide references in any language you can read, such as Urdu? English Wikipedia prefers English references; however, if Urdu references are of better quality (e.g.,aptness, reliability), you should use them to support your article's content.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

primary schools are not necessarily notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja[edit]

Hello, FAAHS. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Government Boys Primary School, Mothparja[edit]

Hello, FAAHS. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Government Boys Primary School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]