User talk:FMSky/Archive 2

Gothic II infobox

I'm confused. In the Template:Infobox video game page, primary sources (which would include the game itself) are mentioned, and nowhere does it mention needing secondary sources for credits, and the only notable need for that was for pre-release. Using the cite video game after every name for a game with a credits sequence would be redundant and I haven't seen any other video game infobox do that. What I'm confused on as well is that you left the designer and composer, who are not mentioned in the article via secondary sources, meaning they were also taken from the in-game credits.Rakewater (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

@Rakewater: you seem to be correct, i reverted my edit --FMSky (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the Luis Garavito page.

A substantial amount of information has been removed in your revision regarding Luis Alfredo Garavito Cubillos' childhood infobox. These things retain crucial information in regard to Garavito's early childhood suffering in the context of him being name-called, abused, and bullied by his father and schoolmates. It also particularly notes his early life insecurities, and blossoming personality disturbances. In contrast with other pages relating to serial killers such as Dennis Nilsen and Edmund Kemper, it describes their personal feelings and outlook on things at that particular time in their life. Unless "duplicate content" refers to something completely different than what I (a new member) see it as, why does it necessitate removal when it is completely consistent and crucial to the subject? Thank you for your substantial changes.

- EDIT: Nevermind, hahah. Ignore this rambling; thank you once more for tweaking the article to a much more refined state. :)

Edd Wesson (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

yeah, i noticed that some stuff was mentioned twice or was even contradicting (like the part about his mother), so i merged it and deleted some parts to make more sense --FMSky (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent tidy-ups to conspiracy theorist articles

Hi, I noticed your improvements to Sacha Stone and Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist). Thank you for your attention to detail. One of these days I'd also like to get Draft:Geza Tarjanyi over the line. He's a person of very similar qualities to the others. Salimfadhley (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Spielberg and Scorsese regarding One Eyed Jacks

Hello, FMSky, my source for mentioning Scorsese's and Spielberg's intense reverence for One Eyed Jacks is a 14-minute speech Scorsese gave at the New York Film Festival in 2016 when introducing their restoration of the film. I was there and saw him speak at length about it, which is readily available on YouTube and also embedded into an article about the speech in IndieWire by Mark Burger titled "Martin Scorsese Analyzes Marlon Brando in 15-Minute ‘One-Eyed Jacks’ Discussion — Watch." Whenever I get time, I'll work on inserting a citation for that into the Brando article. Thanks for your kind attention and letting me know. I hope I manage to get that done before it recedes into the mists of my memory. Thanks again, FMSky. The Final Edict (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

SPI for User:Frank Andrew Chasar

I re-opened a sockpuppet investigation to look into that account. Suspiciously similar to the edits of a persistent, repeatedly-banned editor. - Special-T (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)<prompt><root/cern><P1. 101. 00>

Armored Saint changes

Hi…this is duojett. Someone continues to change information on the Armored Saint main Wiki page as well as information on their various album pages to information that is incorrect and also without sources. I added a source on one of the album pages a few months ago and will go back to the other pages and add sources as needed. Someone has repeatedly gone through these pages and credited both current guitar players in the band as “rhythm guitar” at various points in the band’s timeline. This is incorrect information and there is no valid source for that information. No guitarist in Armored Saint has ever been or credited as solely a rhythm guitarist. My information comes from album credits, official videos, live footage and in person performances. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duojett (talk • contribs) 20:27, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Duojett: yeah but i looked at the article and there wasn't a source for "lead guitar" either... imo its best just to leave it as "guitar" until someone adds a proper source... FMSky (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Duojett: i found a source (1) for Symbol of Salvation, and it just says "guitars" .. FMSky (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Why are you reverting my edit when I cited a valid source? If you look at the lyric sheet in the album liner notes, all of the lead guitar solo credits are given at each song.I will be reverting the edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duojett (talk • contribs) 02:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

@Duojett:have you even clicked the link: https://img.discogs.com/6uksHkc2l_8j-tGvBph5RtYbuI4=/fit-in/600x598/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-1628452-1492974075-1638.jpeg.jpg where does it say "lead guitar" ?

Your source is a screen shot from a Discogs listing, which shows only a partial of the complete album credits. If you go to the direct source (the CD booklet/album sleeve and complete liner notes) all of the lead guitar solo credits are listed on the lyric pages above the lyrics of each song and below the song titles and songwriting credits. Your referencing an incomplete source and not doing your due diligence. All you did was reference a picture of a sale listing of the CD, posted by a seller on Discogs. Duojett (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Ricky Martin

Good evening FMSky, Ricky Martin has 70 million total sales but is not ranked among the "best selling artists of all time" list. However, he may be among the best-selling Latino artists. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

MOS:RELTIME

Hi there. Please be aware of MOS:RELTIME which recommends against the use of relative constructions referring to time such as "recently" and "currently". I've removed "currently" at Christoph Dabrowski. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

John Bechdel

Why is John Bechdel's page considered for deletion? Why state that John Bechdel is "Just a random band member. Not enough to demonstrate nobility?" Mr. Bechdel has a 30 plus year career in notable bands and has worked with notable artists worldwide. He is also credited on albums and singles that have charted and were nominated for Grammy awards. John Bechdel has approved and authorized his bio and discography personally on his wiki page. He is very much alive and a touring/working musician. Why the frequent edits on his page? Is this an attack? Did my edits personally effect his page? I would appreciate a true response. Thank You.

Rage4order (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

@Rage4order: you can post that on the deletion page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Bechdel), i just started the discussion cause i dont think he meets the requirements to have an article, but i might be wrong. you should probably mention though that you're editing on his behalf---FMSky (talk) 02:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

@Rage4order: I see you posted to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/John Bechdel. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bechdel is probably more suitable. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Beautiful

where are sources for the statements that you're keeping on re-adding--Diana7800 (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

On The Big Day (album) you put back the hip hop genre added by that IP, but is not cited in the source given, nor in the article--Diana7800 (talk) 19:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

On Tyler, the Creator you affirmed that his sexuality doesnt belong in the lead; and i respond, his controversies do, just like in Travis Scott article--Diana7800 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

On LGBTQ+ representations in hip hop music you reverted it per WP:UNDUE, but it makes no sense. The lead of the article cites mainstream artists that increased visibility and social acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community, why shouldn't cite those cited in the sources that did the opposite??--Diana7800 (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

@Diana7800:: You're talking about this edit? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tyler,_the_Creator&diff=1066307187&oldid=1066305828 It literally already says "With his gritty, horrorcore-influenced earlier releases, Tyler was often criticized for his use of homophobic and misogynistic slurs in his lyrics", so why the need to add another paragraph that contains the exact same thing? Also im not gonna discuss whit a one-purpose account created today to insert defamatory and POV-pushing content only FMSky (talk) 19:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Please, approach me with some respect. Wikipedia:Assume good faith#Good faith and newcomers. Plus it's spelled "with" not "whit". I would add that I'm not a one-purpose account created to insert defamatory and POV-pushing content only, as much as you're not a vandal that adds fakely sourced/unsourced reviews/genres just because you did it now, please, calm down and let's talk about it --Diana7800 (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Talking about Tyler, why on Travis Scott page there's a section in the lead about his controversies and on tyler's there is not? Explain it to me--Diana7800 (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Sofía Reyes

Hi! With regards to your reversion of my edits: yes, I do believe you made a mistake unfortunately.

My changes consisted of: - Adding a link to the Wayback Machine page for an existing source link (since the current page no longer exists) - Correcting the article to actually reflect content in the source (source says Reyes began singing at age 10, article erroneously says age 6. I updated it to say 10) - Modifying sentence phrasing to make it easier to read, as current sentences are rambling and unreadable - Removing unsourced conjecture ("like many established artists...")

As such, my changes were supported by the existing source, and only served to improve the accuracy of the currently incorrect article. I will be adding my changes back, but I thank you for your concern. Tequilaconcanciones (talk) 00:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Kittens love Van Halen

RonanTheDude (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Gabriel Pascal

Hi. I saw that you're very active at editing American people linked to the movie industry, which I also started doing recently. I noticed that you edited many of the pages I worked on just after me and made changes to them. Thank you for doing this, as many articles were in a pretty bad shape and need improvements. The only thing I don't understand is why you reverted my edit on the page Gabriel Pascal with no explanation, as I only added some templates and didn't make any change to the general content of the page. Could you please explain it? Thank you in advance! Zsovar3 (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Because you changed his nationality FMSky (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Did I? Could you please explain what you mean by that? Pascal was a Hungarian national, and is referred to as "Hungarian" on the Spanish, French, and German wikis as well, with none of them stating any other nationalities. If there is a reliable source stating otherwise, I of course will not doubt it, as my intention is not to Hungarianize someone who is not Hungarian. Zsovar3 (talk) 03:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Source

Hey I suggest adding the source next to anulled in the Infobox as a reference, I still disagree with it though, as many sources say after Pac was released in Oct it was annulled by then. But make sure too add that reference in the infobox --Aaron106 (talk) 01:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

The infobox doesnt need a source when its already sourced in the text FMSky (talk) 01:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough. --Aaron106 (talk) 01:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

XXXTentacion photo

Hi FMSky, The infobox picture for the XXXTentacion article was uploaded by photographer Jack McKain who did a famous photoshoot for him and is not a copyright violation. Feel free to read the details on Wikimedia Commons here. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XXXTentacion_by_Jack_McKain.jpg TheXuitts (talk) 06:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

This could be any random user, i doubt that's the actual photographer. But i've remove the copyvio tag for now. FMSky (talk) 06:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

https://imgur.com/a/cj9sFTx TheXuitts (talk) 06:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

ok then 👍 FMSky (talk) 06:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Chris Pontius

Hi, I recently received a message about making a change on the “Chris Pontius” entry without citing sources. I am actually new to editing on Wikipedia and created my account because I am Chris Pontius and want the information regarding my Wife and Child to be correct. I can try to find source articles, if necessary, and hopefully do it correctly in editing. Thanks, and any suggestions or tips are appreciated. Best, Chris snapperwhip@gmail.com

Recent changes to Justin Chart page

Hi I'm not sure if this is the appropriate place for this, but I wanted to get back to you on some edits I've made for the Justin Chart page. I made some notes for you on the [page] there but haven't seen any responses except for one. I noticed you and other users had removed some truthful and objective information in many edits, so I'd like to work with you to rectify this with the proper approach. It seems like you are heavily involved in the moderation of this page, so I'd like to work with you to provide the most relevant information as possible (sited, of course) without any bias or promotional angle. What would be the best to work you on this? Thank you! --Corporation Solutions (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, i'm just a regular user, not a moderator or anything. Regarding the article, you should read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest i you're editing on Justin Chart's behalf. -- FMSky (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@FMSky: Thanks for your response. I've actually reviewed that COI article already and am making strides to edit in full transparency and compliance to the guidelines detailed. Aside from that do you mind getting back to me on the other notes I made on the Talk page? LINK: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Justin_Chart I still have some questions in the Regarding hasty content removals and Regarding Justin's musical catalog sections that have yet to receive a response. Would you prefer if I fielded these questions on your Talk page instead? Thanks --Corporation Solutions (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Misclick

I accidentally misclicked vandalism for your recent edit to Peter Dinklage. I meant to do rollback per the source listed. I hope it didn't come off as rude. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Date format query

Hi there. This is not critique, just a question. I see here that you used mdy dates for a Colombian personality. Is that the correct date format? I thought biographies are assumed to have strong national ties per MOS:DATETIES and I see Colombia uses dmy. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 09:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, was indeed a mistake on my part. Should've been dmy. I've corrected it ---FMSky (talk) 11:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

😤

Lalela la nthombi,,stop reverting my edits MotherH(FromDaIsland) (talk) 09:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Eminem Article

Hey there, we’re in a bit of a dispute on the article and I was wondering if you could expand on why you’re undoing my edits? You said “no improvement” but all I was doing was fitting th article within Wikipedia’s manual of style. You don’t say the artists’ stage name, you say their last, while also crediting them with their stage name. There’s no reason undo my edits as they’re improving the article by fitting within the manual of style. Aardwolf68 (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

I dont think such a guide line exists. It is usually preferred to refer to people by their common name / stage name --FMSky (talk) 01:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

From what I’ve seen with manual of style, it’s usually best to refer to them by their legal last name, I could be wrong on this however. Aardwolf68 (talk) 04:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

COPYRIGHT VIOLATION

How did I have copyright violation? Flickr is allowed on Wikipedia, and I LITERALLY added the link to the photo on Flickr. If I can't use Flickr, what can I use????? Please tell me stuff instead of just reverting everything and deleting all my photos. Mandomanny313 (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

copyright vio

Hey why did you delete all my edits on Dennis Smith Jr. instead of just the picture? Seems like a bit much. Mandomanny313 (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Moniker

Siouxsie is her surname in her country England, in the UK press. BTW her solo career has been under the "Siouxsie" moniker. [1] Carliertwo (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Amy Winehouse

Hello, I think the term victim is more appropriate in the medical context than "plague with". Don't you think it is more neutral?--Vanlister (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

XXXTentacion revision

Hi FMSky, I saw recently you reverted several of my revisions on the XXXTentacion page with regards to X’s perception in the media and his views on LGBT topics.

1. “Characterization/characterize” is a more accurate word than “description/describe” since characterize indicates more neutral framing.

2. The term “viciously” when mentioning the attack X made on his cellmate is a non-neutral POV. While I agree that yes, the attack was vicious, POV requires us to restrain ourselves from moral characterizations, even highly justified ones.

3. Fifty Grand never mentioned “gender roles” when talking about X’s beliefs. Not sure why Binksternet added that part. In the interview for the “Look At Me: The XXXTentacion Story” biography, FG is referring to X’s political views in general, not on gender roles.

Hope this clears things up. TheXuitts (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Why did you remove "his gay cellmate"?? Dont you think its kinda relevant in a section about homophobia that the person he attacked is gay? FMSky (talk) 02:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

You are right, that was my mistake. TheXuitts (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

New section

shouldn't WP:COMMONNAME be used in the infobox in The Notorious B.I.G. page? I think it should be instead of Wallace. --Aaron106 (talk) 09:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

@Aaron106: yeah it should actually, idk why it was changed. but wallace isn't completely uncommon too FMSky (talk) 09:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Biggie makes more sense i think :) --Aaron106 (talk) 09:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Should I add it in the infobox? What's your take --Aaron106 (talk) 14:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

you mean in the caption? idk, i think Wallace is fine --FMSky (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Good luck with that

I see you are also trying to communicate with this IP editor. I wish you more luck than my current total failure. I am not sure what to do next ... gah. Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

NYC

Reverting without explanation is unhelpful, and borderline disruptive, you know. You're also restoring some violations of MOS:OVERLINK. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

There's a hidden note you chose to ignore FMSky (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Because it's not based on any policy, just somebody's preference. I was WP:BOLD. (And many of them have no such hidden note). – Muboshgu (talk) 18:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_person says "Place of birth: city, administrative region, country." ... Brooklyn etc are boroughs. FMSky (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

That's template documentation, not wiki-policy. And people instead write New York City, U.S., which violates OVERLINK. Boroughs in NYC are fairly equivalent to most other cities, IMO. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Guy Berryman

You can't just say "not needed" and call it a day. Why are you removing well sourced information from the article? GustavoCza (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

i shortened a sentence, i didnt remove anything notable at all --FMSky (talk) 02:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

So it's just a personal reason and you have no basis for it? It's not like Berryman's page is in need of reduction. GustavoCza (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

not, it's improving the readability FMSky (talk) 07:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

The text is pretty comprehensible already. GustavoCza (talk) 22:47, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Vanessa Kirby middle name and birthplace

Hi, I noticed you removed Vanessa Kirby’s middle name and place of birth. She was born in Wimbledon according to the Scotsman, BBC, and a bunch of other sources. Her middle name is Nuala, according to many sources as well. So do not remove again please. She has a middle name and she has a birthplace. Beatlemania2002 (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Those sources arent in the article though. FMSky (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to Carol (2015)

Hello,

I noticed that you marked the Controversies Section of Carol (2015 film) as excessively detailed. Please could I ask you why you thought it was too detailed - as I thought the subject matter was important - and didn't see any extraneous material that I could cut. Have a lovely day! 92.0.35.8 (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2015

Hi FMSky, there's an edit war going on between myself and WPUNJ going on. He is adding unexplained edits and removing content also with no explanation whatsoever, can you please resolve this matter. Neo the Twin (talk) 04:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

50 Cent

This is WPUNJ. Ill leave the part that 50 Cent is a businessman instead of entrepreneur, but I will add that he is a record executive. He owns G-Unit Records, so he's a record executive. This should stay. WPUNJ (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your Reversions

Unless you are going to state a policy-based explanation for your reversions, please stop reverting my edits. Displaying the references in multiple columns, rather than a single list, is standard practice. Large-scale reversions of another editor without explanation can be considered disruptive editing. Canadian Paul 18:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@Canadian Paul: My bad, i was pretty sure that standard columwidths were preferable but it seems there is no such guideline. However, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Reflist does state: "The syntax {{Reflist|2}} (for example), which specifies two columns of equal width regardless of the available display width, is deprecated. " -- FMSky (talk) 18:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Interesting, I did not realize that this format was depreciated! When I have a little more time, I will go back and correct that error with more current formatting. Thanks for letting me know! Canadian Paul 18:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Canadian Paul. Forcing the column size was useful long ago when everyone was on a basic computer. As new devices like laptops and cell phones came along forcing the size of columns was deprecated since that rendered the refs un-viewable on some of those devices. Best regards to you both. MarnetteD|Talk 03:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Johnny Ramone

Why did you revert my changes to the Johnny Ramone article? KhlavKhalash (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

unexplained removal of sourced content FMSky (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Did you read my explanation on the talk section? Obviously not. KhlavKhalash (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I just checked the source again. No mention of 'highhain sound'. If you know about guitar sounds, you know its bs. KhlavKhalash (talk) 14:56, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

yeah my bad, read the talk page again, i have already self-reverted FMSky (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ademola Okulaja.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ademola Okulaja.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: Which type of picture qualifies as fair-use? Could you maybe link one that's possible to use. Thanks FMSky (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

See WP:NFCI for some examples and guidance on what is acceptable. The issue with the image you uploaded is that it was from a commercial image agency. See WP:NFCC#UII which gives examples of unacceptable uses including point 7. Whpq (talk) 17:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Apologies

For removing your pic here. I'm glad you resored it so quickly. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 03:37, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

DS alert gender

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

DS alert BLP

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Rowling

Re your edits to J. K. Rowling, please see WP:WIAFA and WP:FAOWN and discuss edits on talk to gain consensus. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)