User talk:Faceoftheday66666

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Faceoftheday66666! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to The Dope Show, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Rob van vee 06:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Mechanical Animals, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Faceoftheday66666! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 09:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see the template documentation for the correct usage of lists. You are almost always using them wrong. --Muhandes (talk) 09:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Freshworth72688 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freshworth72688. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 11:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]