User talk:FactsandTruthareKING

Welcome[edit]

Hello, FactsandTruthareKING, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FactsandTruthareKING (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is not a sock account. Just because someone is offended by a word - does not mean they should be allowed to censor, attack, curse at, and file falso complaints against myself. I corrected factual errors, and documented such on one article. Then in violation of edit warring I was attacked and reported. I pointed out that the edits I did were back by fact, by source material, and by consensus within the talk page. Instead the reporting party came onto my talk page and cursed at me by telling me he doesn't give a shit, and worked to get me blocked.

At no point did I do anything considered to be a sock account, at no point did I post anything inaccurate or unbacked by facts and sources. Please unblock my account. FactsandTruthareKING (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM — Daniel Case (talk) 23:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FactsandTruthareKING (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User Daniel Case simply declined my request for unblock with no review, no reason. This is patently pathetic. As I stated before, this is not a sock account. Just because more than one human on the planet stands for factual statements - does not make my account a sock account. In fact, that shows several folks feel this is ridiculous. Anyone objective would actually review this. Not simply deny it as a way to get their brownie points for feeling superior. FactsandTruthareKING (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A review was not necessary since other than denying sock puppetry(which every sockpuppeteer does, since that's the point) your request contained nothing relevant to your actions, which is why you were blocked. Your request should say nothing about what others did. If you are not a sock, you will need to address the specific reasons why we think you are. As an aside I'd also suggest reading WP:TRUTH since if you are just here to be a truth fighter, you will have a tough time here since truth is in the eye of the beholder. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FactsandTruthareKING (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Address the specific reasons why we think you are" - what a wonderfully pointless statement. So I am supposed to read your mind, to be able to address a reason you feel I am a sock puppet? Amazing, can you explain when telepathy became a requirement for wikipedia? Oh and "truth is in in the eye of the beholder"? No Truth is truth, that is all it is. It isn't your truth, my truth, someone else's - truth simply is truth. Frankly are you are stating is that I will have a tough time with stating fact that you and other leftists do not like. ie - You and them are not here to build knowledge - but to push your opinion and agenda. This pathetic experience with you and others like you has shown me exactly how worthless wikipedia is, and exactly why wikipedia can not be used for any professional or educational endeavor. 331dot you should be ashamed of yourself. You are intellectually dishonest and worthless. FactsandTruthareKING (talk) 00:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2021[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2019 Nevada killing spree. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GPL93 (talk) 22:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This fact is already discussed on the talk page. Tell me, was this same warning sent to the other person? It isn't on their page, yet they are the one constantly deleting fact. FactsandTruthareKING (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh of course not - as you are the complaining and offended person who is edit warring AND then sending warnings and blocks. Real clear what type of person you are. Facts never change. Remember that! FactsandTruthareKING (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be frank I don't really give a shit about the subject matter, but if you want to change it please use the proper channels. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be frank you are a coward. Proper channels were used. You not "giving a shit" is not a surprise. Enjoy the ego. FactsandTruthareKING (talk) 22:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, you engage in edit warring - yet report me for it to get me in trouble. Then you come on my page and curse at me and report my account as a sock account to get me banned? So you are what? A spoiled angry 12 year old? You are everything wrong with this world. Offend your delicate sensibilities and you go on a tirade. Truly a pathetic display of an intellectual ability.

Your talk page access has been revoked for making personal attacks. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:41, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]