User talk:Fantastic4boy~enwiki

Hello Fantastic4boy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Ageo020 00:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

--Ageo020 00:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cemetery1.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cemetery1.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Malaysian Jew.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Malaysian Jew.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Penang Jewish 1835.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Penang Jewish 1835.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 07:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jewish_Cemetery.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jewish_Cemetery.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jimage34153.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimage34153.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits toInternet Movie Database and Oral sex[edit]

Please do not remove valid links to other Wikipedia projects. The Indonesian articles exist for both these topics, therefore there is no reason to remove the links. Fan-1967 16:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Euromalays article[edit]

Hello. You may want to have your views regarding the legitimacy of the article heard on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euromalays instead of just posting them on Talk:Euromalays. Best regards. —Lagalag 10:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I listed my reasons in the AfD nomination. Thanks. --Chris S. 13:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For everyone's benefit, can you explain further on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euromalays what's the difference between Euromalays and other, more well-known terms like serani on ? BTW I'm from Malaysia and of mixed race, but I'd never heard the term Euromalay until today; Wikipedia has a policy against original research which, among other things, means we shouldn't use neologisms as the names of articles; I don't see that the term Euromalay has any scholarly acceptance, which is why I suggest that renaming the article might be the best way to save it from deletion. Cheers. cab 17:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm sorry for the late reply - been busy recently. Anyway, I've managed to change the Euromalays article to European Malays - understanding that I shouldn't be inventing new words that have no cited sources other than Wikipedia. So, how's my new article going? --Fantastic4boy 07:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi cab. Thank you for your comments this matter and for letting me realise that my "Euromalay" article (since that it's neologism) is going against policy since that is it not related to original research and that scholarly unacceptable. I'm not sure whether or not you have received this response, but this was my reply to you regarding Euromalays. As we have discussed earlier on, Serani is a Malay term for Eurasian, in which it refers to people with European and Asian parentage regardless of what the Asian background is. I thank you for your generosity in advising me on such matter and I have made some corrections regarding that article. I have decided moved the article Euromalays to European-Malays, in which it is a term used to qualify both Malay and European characteristics, or should I change to European-Malay ancestry to avoid conflict with Wikipedia policy? What do you think?

Hi there. The text does make sense, besides containing a lot of useful information pertaining to people of mixed Malay and European descent. As for Filipinos being Malay, I’ve lived in the Philippines all my life and yes, ethnic Filipinos in general do consider themselves Malay. Even José Rizal, considered our greatest national hero, was once dubbed the “Pride of the Malay Race”. —Lagalag 12:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. We very much appreciate and value the work you are doing here, especially with regards to Malay-related articles. Keep up the good work and best regards. —Lagalag 07:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfred Hamilton-Shimmen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wilfred Hamilton-Shimmen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MER-C 07:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ashraf sinclair.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashraf sinclair.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Maya Karin[edit]

This is the English language Wikipedia. I have removed the portions of the Maya Karin article which are not in English. If you would like to translate them, please do so. User:Zoe|(talk) 07:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion notice[edit]

A tag has been placed on Prisoners rights in Islam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Seraphimblade 07:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of conversion from Judaism to Islam[edit]

I have moved it back. See the talk page and the AfD, at which it was resolved that "Muslim Jew" and the like is not a good name. - crz crztalk 03:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have speedily deleted the inflammatory image "Image:Allah star.JPG" you created. - crz crztalk 13:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hilaly[edit]

Do you have acess to material about Hilaly? I have found a biography but it is not a verifiable, reliable source. http://forums.muslimvillage.net/lofiversion/index.php/t27683.html For this article I need verifiable reputable sources. SmithBlue 05:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just found some helpful links that could verify reputable sources. Hope they'd satisfy the resource materials u're looking for:

And to consider that Prophet Muhammad mentioned that “No Arab is superior to a non-Arab and no non-Arab is superior to an Arab. No white man is superior to a black man, and no black man is superior to a white man.” [1], Sheik Hilaly has breached the Islamic ruling by stating that Muslims should have more rights than the Anglo-Saxons in Australia. [2] Remember that Muslims are not only for the Arabs but also for other races. Furthermore, doesn't he realise that there are a number of Anglo-Muslims like Yvonne Ridley and Yusuf Estes (former Christian preacher now a Muslim Chaplain) [3] and that this would certainly offend them?

Anything else that you'd like to know? Please do let me know when you do. --Fantastic4boy 14:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic4boy thanks for the links - I havent got the software for the video and so cant watch it -is it the Egyptian TV interview - I've seen that on www.youtube.com We have the translation in this article already.

Am after reputable sources for the following;

Sheikh Tajeddine was born the eldest of eight children.
at the age of 17 he then went on to formally study at Al Alazhar University and graduated from there four years later with an International Certificate for Islamic Religion and Arabic Language. The last two years of his education he spent specialising in Shariah Law. After graduation he worked for two years as a judge of Islamic law in the Family Court of Egypt.
speaking out against social injustice and the very low standard of living of people in general, he angered the government and was arrested two or three times over a couple of years.
In his early thirties Sheikh Tajeddine accepted a position to be an Imam in a mosque in Libya and moved their with his wife and young daughter Shayma.
speaking out against the communist Gaddafi regime and it's injustices to the people.
5 years in Libya, he spent the next 3 years between Tunisia, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon, but being mainly based in Lebanon, unfortunately during the peak of the Lebanese civil war.
In 1982, after speaking out against a massacre that took place that led to the slaughter of thousands of people, an assassination attempt was made on his life by some unidentified gunmen.
In 1983 the Mufti of Lebanon sent Sheikh Tajeddine to Australia to become the Imam of Lakemba Mosque
1983 Sheikh Sheikh Tajeddine left his wife and two daughters behind in Lebanon
1989, was granted his Australian citizenship.
instrumental in the establishment of the first Muslims Women's Association in Australia
written many books
has attendedIslamic conferences through out the Muslim world.

Also would like to find; what sort of Muslim is he? (Shiite?, Sunni?), how was he selected to be the Iman at Lakemba?, what duties does he have at the Lakemba Mosque?, Are there 2 Mosques in Lakemba? Cause there are 2 Imams in Lakemba - see Lakemba Mosque discusion for details. Is this usual? SmithBlue 14:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SmithBlue Interesting information on Hilaly. I'm not sure whether Hilaly is Sunni or Shiite. I'll do more reasearch on the area you want to know about and let you know here if I find any more reliable sources on Sheik Hilaly. --Fantastic4boy 23:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fantastic4boy, if you've got time could you tell me where I might find out more about "Dar ul Fatwa of Lebanon" on the web? thanks SmithBlue 11:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malay people picture[edit]

To my knowledge Rasuna Said is a Minangkabau, not a Malay. They are two distinct ethnic groups. (Caniago 12:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I do acknowledge that Rasuna Said is a Minangkabau. However, despite being matrilineal, the Minangkabaus show lots of similarity with the Malays in terms of individual houses in the kampongs, the costumes and music. If I'm not mistaken, the Minangkabaus in Malaysia are accepted as an ethnic Malays since that they practise a culture similar to the Malays. I can't really attach the music and video files here though but I can have a look on the internet for you. --Fantastic4boy 03:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I haven't made my statements clear to you. Furthermore, I'd like to add on that the article is not only referring to the Malays of eastern Sumatra, Malay peninsula, parts of Borneo and southern Thailand, but basically those who are anthropologically Malays, i.e. related by their language and physique. Filipinos themselves are Austronesians yet a Filipino hero such as Jose Rizal, who is part native of the Philippines, is dubbed as "Pride of the Malay race" (see European Malays) - yet their culture isn't as much related to Malays unlike the Minangkabaus. Thus, I think it'll be alright to state Rasuna Said based on the discussions I've made above.

Please provide citations for this claim and any of the claims made in the Malay article, otherwise the whole Malay article is a total falsehood. I can provide a stack of citations which show that the Malay ethic group is distinct from the Minang ethic group. I suggest you start by looking at the last Indonesian census (for 2000) which lists Malays and Minangkabau as a distinct groups. Next, I suggest you take a look at Encyclopedia Briticanna which also doesn't support any of the claims made in the Malay article. The problem in Malaysia is that the term Malay has become hijacked by politicians. Rather than swallowing their propaganda and regurgitating it on Wikipedia, I suggest you start hitting the books and open your eyes to the truth. (Caniago 08:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I know you that you'd disagree with me and may consider me like a "Malay Supremacist", but I'm not making up my statements on the Minangkabaus being Malays. I'd be gladly to give you the cited sources. I'm not basing my facts on some bias Malaysian politician propaganda stating the validity for a group of people as "Malays" and I'm not regurgitating them as you think I am. The Minangkabau article states that the Minangkabaus are of Malay stock - "The Minang people belong to the Malay stock" [4]. Demographics for Reference.com and Sumatra Infomarmation: "The people are of Malay stock composed of many different tribes, speaking 52 different languages. Most of these groups, however, share many similar traditions and the different tongues are closely related." [5][6] The Acehnese [7] and Bugis [8] are considered Malays due to their relations as part of the Malay stock yet they are still considered as separate ethnic groups. Is there anything else you would like me to find out? I'd be happy to provide you with books on Minangkabau people to see whether they are related to the Malay stock/part of the Malay sub-family if you want. That'll take some time since that I have other work to do for the rest of the week. I'll leave my comments here with the citations of author and the books when I find them. --Fantastic4boy 22:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify on the Malays article, to my scrutinised observation, the purpose of the article is not to define and explain about ethnic Malays but rather the Malay racial stock consisting of different ethnic groups, in which it includes linguistic relations to each other. --Fantastic4boy 23:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you don't seem to understand. When you find a single reliable source (WP:RS) let me know (on my talk page, since I'm not going to be monitoring your talk page). Please don't just quote the rubbish you find on the Internet (including Wikipedia). I'm looking for reliable peer reviewed academic citations. (Caniago 23:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Talk page comments[edit]

I am removing some of your comments of January 13th at Talk:Taj El-Din Hilaly. Talk pages are not to be used to express negative (or positive) things about the subject of the article except in the context of improving the article. Another editor has already noted the problem with not complying with WP:TALK; I'm removing it (and changing the section title) as part of cleanoup of the talk page. Please do not put the comment back. John Broughton | ♫ 19:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments[edit]

Wikipedia:Etiquette. Wikipedia:Civility and WP:PA are some issues that you may wish to consider in relation to your acitvity on user talk pages - you should think first, perhaps even go away from the issue for a while. SatuSuro 01:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rights of prisoners[edit]

Islamic jurisprudence might had some rules to deal with them, but to the best of my knowledge, a major source of slaves within the institution of slavery at the advent of Islam were the prisoners of war. The Qur'an rooted this out by legislating that prisoners of war should be freed at all costs, either by accepting ransom or as a favour by not taking any ransom money. No other option was available to the Muslims (kindly see ^{[Quran 47:4]}). And also there is no punishment in Qur'an or hadith that is related to prinson. Hence, I personally believe that this question is not raised at all. For more information, kindly see "Slavery" in Mizan. Cheers! TruthSpreader^reply 04:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

European Malays/Arab Malays[edit]

You might want to read my comments at the AfD of these two articles. While I feel that Turkish Malays is indeed not very notable, I feel that the articles of these two topics are notable. To me, I feel that the Weterners feel that they are non-notable because they lacked the understanding of the history of SE Asian history and sociology. Practically, I feel that we should ask the opinions of the Malays and non-Malays of Singapore and Malaysia. Call up the members of Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Singapore and Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Malaysia. Let's access their opinions. Vote your part in the Afd too: [9] [10]. Thanks. Mr Tan 07:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your comments and thank you for the helpful suggestions, Mr Tan. There are actually small communities such as Turkish Malays, Arab Malays and European Malays (Eurasians with mixed Malay and European descent) but it's difficult to prove their existence . If only I could find more resources that would make the mentioned communities notable to prove at a satisfactory academic level, then I'll. I may need more time for this since that I have uni assignments to finish up this week. I see what I can do. --Fantastic4boy 03:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your edits and creations relating to Islam articles[edit]

You might want to take a look at WP:RS#Extremist sources, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV. I noticed some of your edits include origional research, and information from extremist websites quoted as fact. Try to use scholarly sources in future edits.--Sefringle 03:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templete for quran and hadith[edit]

I noticed in some of your edits you were quoting the quran and hadith. For future quran and hadith quotations/references, please use the USC-MSA templete as mentionded below. This templete makes a link to the quranic verse or hadith. This makes it easier others to view the verse, since they can view it from the USC-MSA website [11] by just clicking on the link. This website provides an online translation of the quran and hadith. It works like this:

For quranic verse 8:10, enter {{Quran-usc|8|10}}.

This will allow people to just click on the link and view the verse as ^{[Quran 8:10]}.

For hadith quotes, to show Sahih al-Bukhari, 8:73:68, enter {{hadith-usc|usc=yes|Bukhari|8|73|68}}. --Sefringle 03:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sefingle. I have just noticed something was missing, but thanks for pointing out to me. --Fantastic4boy 05:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Social rights in Islam[edit]

An editor has nominated the article Social rights in Islam for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social rights in Islam. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Social rights in Islam during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prisoner Rights in Islam[edit]

Hey! I believe you created this article Prisoners rights in Islam. I think you shoudl exapnd this article from info from Islamic military jurisprudence article. Look under "Prisoners of War". If you need more info, feel free to contact me (User:Bless_sins, bless_sins@yahoo.ca), as I can pull out some resources on the topic. Pls. do expand this article!Bless sins 16:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental protection in Islam[edit]

Fantastic4boy, I have some sources on this(From Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature). Please send me an email and I'll reply you back with the sources (I can not attach it myself from wikipedia email). Thanks --Aminz 08:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Dajjal.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dajjal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Malays picture[edit]

It could be improved by including at least one female. Also, Yusof bin Ishak may not be the best Malay example since he is half Minangkabau. (Caniago 09:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, my area of expertise is mostly Minangkabau. (Caniago 09:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Battle of Najaf 2007[edit]

Hi Fantastic4boy, I'm editing Battle of Najaf (2007). I have found a satelite image of the area. But it doesnt have locality names written on it. What it does have is "notes" written on it in Arabic. If you read Arabic I would be very interested to know what the notes say. Satelite image at [|Satelite image Najaf and Zarqa (?Zarga)] SmithBlue 09:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images you have uploaded[edit]

I notice you have uploaded alot of images and tagged them with the Creative Commons license. Do you have permission from the websites you have taken these images from to upload these images to Wikipedia with this license? You should probably read Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Adding_images. (Caniago 07:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Fantastic Boy, I've noticed you initially gave another website credit for these photos. Now you are saying you took them. Can you provide the original higher resolution photos. Otherwise it is hard to believe that you took them and that you are not simply plagiarising. --Merbabu 09:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dravidians in Hong Kong[edit]

The reason your edits to the Dravidian people home page were reverted had nothing to do with how correct they were. They were reverted by a user (Geomatician) who's been disrupting many Indian-related pages, and seems to have picked on this one as a particular favourite. Feel free to just revert his edits entirely rather than painstakingly adding back in the bits you put (thanks for the info by the way - it's useful data for the article). Orpheus 01:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam and slavery lead[edit]

Dear interested editor:
Please visit here: [12] in the next few days and give your vote and your proposals on how the lead may be reworked and reformed to meet GA criteria before next nomination.DavidYork71 04:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malays[edit]

It would be great if you could devote your time to something productive instead of adding nonsense about Malay populations around the world that has already been discredited. Cape Malays and Sri Lankan Malays are a mixture of ethnic groups - Javanese, etc. (Caniago 09:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

But they consider themselves ethnic Malays don't they? To my knowledge, it's through Malay cultural assimilation they've become Malays. So, how am I talking nonsense? --Fantastic4boy 09:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are called malays in the colonial sense of the word, as in Malay race. There are multiple meanings of the term Malay, so please don't confuse them. (Caniago 09:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Since you are obviously interested in the topic, send me an email and I give you a copy of a couple of academic papers you will find interesting. (Caniago 09:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks, Caniago. I'd do that. --Fantastic4boy 08:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Islam and the Native Americans[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Islam and the Native Americans, by 76.167.195.40, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Islam and the Native Americans provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Islam and the Native Americans, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Islam and the Native Americans itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Animal welfare in Islam[edit]

I enjoyed very much reading the article that you created about Animal welfare in Islam and felt that I should let you know. I learned lots of useful things about how to care for animals. 69.116.234.208 17:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed those boxes[edit]

They were redlinks, hope its ok with you. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 13:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ashraf-Sinclair.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashraf-Sinclair.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Image:Melacca 055.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Melacca 055.jpg, by Caniago (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Melacca 055.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Melacca 055.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Malays.JPG[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Malays.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 10:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Malays1.JPG[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Malays1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 11:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Chermin.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chermin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ijau-Pattani.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ijau-Pattani.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Masjid_kampung_laut.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Masjid_kampung_laut.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goreng sagu[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Goreng sagu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please[edit]

Do You really need to find another subject to put the word malay with? Have you edited other areas of wikipedia at all?

Please believe me there will come a time (if it has not already) that experienced long term editors will ask you to STOP creating more X malay, or malay X as it might constitute nuisance editing. Have you prepared for that contigency?

If you havent please consider it now before it becomes an issue and someone actually takes you to task in a lot less civil manner. I am assuming WP:AGF by sending this message, and expect the same in return. Please consider that sufficient enroaching upon what really also exists in the Indonesian national and cultural sphere is enough for some editors to wonder what you will find next that is malay, that is also Indonesian. If you could please plan to move on in some way would be of great benefit for yourself and the wikipedia community.

Please feel free to ask me id anything is not clear - it is assumed that the enthusiasm for malayness can be also transferred to other subjects while you are working on Wikipedia.

Thanks for your contributions - please read and think carefully about this as it might in the end help us all if you understand what wikipedia is WP:NOT and what the limits are . Satu Suro 04:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, further Malay Town smacks of original research. Please only use it to refer to a specific place that both exists and is notable. Do not create concepts that don't exist. Rather than create more obscure "Malay X" articles, why not do some research and improve the many existing articles.

ON a seperate issue, I advise extreme caution that you don't edit without signing in. THe anon IP's you are using from time to time have been involved in some very serious vandalism along racial grounds and that they seem to be Malay. While there is no definite proof that this is you, I note the similar articles and that suspicions can be aroused. Please ensure that you only edit under this user name. Remember, bans on wikipedia apply to people, not accounts, and this account could be included - you don't want to be caught up in that mess. kind regards --Merbabu (talk) 06:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Chukerman[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brett Chukerman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0152986. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On Apostasy[edit]

I don't know much about the Qur'an, but I understand a lot of people interpret it as calling for capital punishment for apostates. I created a new section at Discrimination against atheists specifically for this. Right now it's just a link to Apostasy in Islam. Do you think you could expand on apostasy and, since you seem to be interested in Islam, maybe add some more stuff too? AzureFury (talk | contribs) 23:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of British Malays[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, British Malays, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Malays. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanjung Rhu Resort[edit]

The article Tanjung Rhu Resort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Misleading redirect. Tanjung Rhu Resort and Tanjung Sanctuary are not the same entity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AJ Cham 08:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tanjung Rhu Resort listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tanjung Rhu Resort. Since you had some involvement with the Tanjung Rhu Resort redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AJ Cham 21:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanjung Sanctuary Resort & Spa[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tanjung Sanctuary Resort & Spa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 06:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muslim hebrews.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Muslim hebrews.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malay Town[edit]

The article Malay Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced and ureferencable nonsense

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deanna Yusoff[edit]

The article Deanna Yusoff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable and has no reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 21:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Fantastic4boy. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Fantastic4boy~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islam and children for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islam and children is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and children until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brett Chukerman[edit]

The article Brett Chukerman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP, IMDb is only external link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islam and children for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islam and children is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam and children (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iskandar323 (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]