User talk:Farzad Pak

Dear Wikipedia Editor Team,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly follow up on the status of my Wikipedia profile page's publication. As per my previous communication, I have made sure to include all the necessary information, verified references, and reliable sources to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of the content.

Understanding the high demand on your time and the various responsibilities you manage, I would like to express my sincere appreciation for your dedication to maintaining the quality of Wikipedia content. I am eager to know if there are any additional steps required on my end or any suggestions you might have to expedite the publication process.

I understand that your efforts contribute significantly to the reliability and credibility of Wikipedia as a platform for accurate information. Please know that I am available to address any questions or concerns you may have regarding my profile page.

Thank you for your continued commitment, and I am looking forward to your response regarding the status of my Wikipedia profile page.

Best regards, Farzad Pak

Please write in your own words, Farzad Pak. Obviously AI-generated text is not appreciated here, not even if the bot has been instructed to lay on extreme flattery. Or actually particularly not if it has been. I have deleted your userpage, as self-promotional pseudo-articles are not what userpages are for. Bishonen | tålk 13:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Farzad Pak

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Farzad Pak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Wikipedia:Help desk. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:50, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your swift reply. My page was not published. Since I spent a lot of time creating it with all the relevant references, could you please activaye my page again for few hours so that i can note down all the informations that i included. Farzad Pak (talk) 14:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Farzad Park, I don't believe Theroadislong can do that, but I can, since I'm an administrator. You can activate your Wikipedia e-mail in your Preferences if you like, and I'll e-mail it to you. Or, perhaps simpler for you, I can put your text into a subpage of the form User:Farzad Park/Autobiography, for an hour or two. I haven't done that yet — that's why the page link is red. But I will, if you reply below and a) promise that you won't put it anywhere else on Wikipedia, and b) that you will copy the text for your own use within an hour. I'm assuming that you want it for something other than creating an autobiography on Wikipedia. Please note that the creation of autobiographies is strongly discouraged here. See WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Bishonen | tålk 14:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]

I think you contacted the wrong person

You just contacted my Ip (I was to embarrassed to ask with my user because I’m far from new here) on the teahouse. But your answer had absolutely nothing to do with the question. If your searching for support, well just don’t create any article but go to the marked in red User page next to discussion, and that’s literally your user page. *HOW DIFFICULT*. And… well then you write your stuff. If that’s what it is about. I usually don’t give answers because I’m really bad at giving them (the good ones that is).

And it would be a bit more polite of you to do that somewhere else ok. Or to ask the question individually. Answers are usually pretty quick. Now maybe most users are going to think my question was answered and not actually give an answer. So thanks in advance for that. But I have a feeling this was a mistake, so I’m informing. Have a good day. Reman Empire (talk) 13:50, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Please read WP:USERPAGE for what is allowed there, it is NOT a location for an article about you and please note there are no "profile pages" on Wikipedia, we have articlesabout people who was the criteria at WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your swift reply. My page was not published. Since I spent a lot of time creating it with all the relevant references, could you please activaye my page again for few hours so that i can note down all the informations that i included. Farzad Pak (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend rewriting it and adding less self promotional content. There aren’t really any strict guidelines, and most users are not having a long biographical account as their user page. Take me for exemple (It’s not the best exemple since I chose to remain largely anonymous, but it still offers you a good exemple of what you could do). I put (for humours sake) on it that I was Remanus II, king of the Reman Empire, and then I put a bunch of other things, mainly my views on the encyclopedia and from time to time articles I’m working on. (Although I stopped doing the latter ever since I moved from the English to the French Wiki). Anyway, that content was in all probability not precious. As to the references, you won’t need them and you shouldn’t use them, or it will probably be deleted again.

So to explain there is no publishing process or anything. For articles they are reviewed (but that’s only for the English Wikipedia) and for user pages there is nothing. Just go to User Page and write whatever you want, within certain obvious limits of course. There is no, always on the move, jurisdiction or anything similar. What happened here is that a user, in this case you, made essentially a biography of his with references, a bibliography and all the rest. That is a no no. You can on the other hand, if you think you are significant enough, create an actual article on you. This article will then be reviewed. The reviewing process takes a long time so don’t press; your answer will always be simple and plain, essentially just "it takes long". After that time the results come in. You may not be accepted as being important enough for an actual article, just like there is an article on Julius Caesar, on Joe Biden or on the Inca Empire. As to your user page, again. NO. Your user page is not your biography with sources, references and all the rest. That is the ONLY reason your user page got deleted. The ONLY reason.

So in conclusion, instead of asking about publication or the old content (which, to answer this particular question, is archived), it’s best to just make a good User Page. And thats all. How about you click on all the names of all the people who have messaged you, including me (the names, not the discussion pages), and get inspiration from their User Pages. I hope I’ve been helpful. Reman Empire (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

Hi again, Farzad. You asked for your userpage text back, expressing that it was very important to you, but when I offered to supply it on certain conditions (as I thought, very simple ones), you fell silent. I don't understand that. Does it mean you no longer care about getting your text back? Bishonen | tålk 07:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC).[reply]