Jump to content

User talk:Filing Flunky/Archives

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you

Hello!

I just wanted to say thanks for fixing the mistyped category title that quickly. You hunted down and corrected the mistake immediately! Thank you! — Thehoboclown (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello! You're quite welcome. :-) Filing Flunky (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mojolicious

Hello, Filing Flunky, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Mojolicious, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Sparthorse (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

A hundred reverts a minute... isn't this fun?

Thanks for all the vandalism reverts on my talk/user page!  Mbinebri  talk ← 18:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Piet Mondrian

Sorry for the heavy-handed edit. I was mainly concerned with the Vancouver condo development. A previous editor was blocked for spamming the article and this was re-added by an apparent sock. Obviously, the linked article makes sense as a mention. freshacconci talktalk 11:32, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

That's OK. Anti-spam is hard work. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 11:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Azal: Zechariah 14:5

Really appreciate your help with the editing. It's really nice when I don't have to do everything by myself. Someone else correcting my errors almost feels like a luxury. Zechariahfourteenfive (talk) 21:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. Filing Flunky (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Optimyth Software

Thank you for your message.

It is true that Optimyth Software is my employer. But the article I wrote about the company is not advertisement. I clearly published it as a company stub and it includes verifiable references and it is based on facts.

I have followed the guidelines and overall tried to be honest. I could have signed it under a fake name or ask somebody to write it for me so editors could not track me down, but I didn't. What would you suggest?

Javier.salado (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

I've edited it for WP:Neutral point of view. best, Filing Flunky (talk) 11:38, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Alex Tobiasson Harris

Notable, how exactly? -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Quote: He is the 2008 and 2010 Swedish National Muay thai champion in the -75 kilos weight division, the 2008 IFMA World Championships B-class champion and the 2011 IFMA World Championships A-class silver medalist. On November 28:th 2011, he fought Japanese K-1 MAX standout Yoshihiro Sato to a unanimous decision win. A national champion of a notable sport is clearly notable. It needs more references to back up the claims though. Filing Flunky (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
And we will hopefully see those references in 7 days, or the article will be deleted. Thanks, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Poor referencing is not a reason to delete an article. Why not help me hunt for references instead? Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Barring the fact that it actually is a very good reason to delete an unreferenced article as it ruins the encyclopedia's integrity, I will assist in finding references. The subject is not in the news section of Google, just checked. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
But it wasn't unreferenced: it had an EL to his local club. Better references were needed: I just added one from a national Swedish paper. Filing Flunky (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Well there you go :) found one reference more than I did. It would help if the references were English... much easier to find. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Where are the references for: Lusine Serobyan? -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Nevermind. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah there aren't any, and I can't find any online. She removed your speedy tag: I just put it back, and added unref BLP and autobio. Filing Flunky (talk) 12:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Look, before you think of me as some kind of mass deletionist etc. I really am not. I just like to be by-the-book, and If an article were to be notable it should have reliable references - which these past articles did not have. If they were to be deleted - wouldn't be easier to recreate them, including the relevant required sources? -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
No I don't think you're a mass deletionist, and I'm not a mass inclusionist, but maybe you could slow down a little. Yes, articles need reliable references, but that's not a reason to quickly speedy them. Tag it unref for 10 minutes or so, and if there are no references whatsoever (or just refs that don't mention the subject at all), then WP:BLPPROD it. If it even has one crappy YouTube or IMDB reference, it can't be BLP prodded, though it can be prodded or AFD'd on grounds of notability (for example) if no refs can be found. The Lusine Serobyan article contained no references at all (apart from unhelpful ref tags containing only the words "Armenian 1" and "English 2" etc.), and I think you were right to speedy it on notability. But most WP:NEWCOMERs will have no idea that articles can be re-created, and will often be too intimidated or upset to ask. Better to go more slowly, and make sure that there's really zero chance of a useful article in there before speedying. Thanks Filing Flunky (talk) 12:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Filing Flunky. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

For reverting the IP that vandalized my talk page. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Any time! Filing Flunky (talk) 10:19, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

buddha in a traffic jam

Person creating this wiki page has nothing to do with it, so kindly don't accuse me/us of any lack of integrity!

Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviagni1234 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

I never accused anyone of a lack of integrity. Please stop deleting Ravi Agnihotri's name from the article Friday Night Productions: the news links all mention his name as a founder of the company. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


Ok, have added him as Founder, not co-founder! hope the matter is closed...Many thanks Filing Flunky for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviagni1234 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


Raviagni1234 (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)I think the matter should stand closed now. You could refer all external links of the page. They are by national print and electronic media. They substantiate that every information on the wiki page is verified and substantiated without even an iota of falseness. please refer the links. Username is Ravi1234 because I wanted to create a page where I am mentioning the founder how he single-handedly made this company. Have followed the movie buddha in a traffic jam very closely. Though not closely associated with ravi agnihotri, still know his work!Raviagni1234 (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of Article - Onward Technologies

Hi Filing Flunky,

I'm a newbie to Wiki.

Recently you have deleted my article "Onward Technologies" stating "Conflict of Interest".

Can you help me in understanding about the base items for which the article has been deleted.

Also, Can you recover the page for me so that I can modify as per your comments and will give a copy to proof read??

Let me know your comments.

--OnwardRavi (talk) 12:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)TRavi — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnwardRavi (talk • contribs) 12:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome. I haven't deleted the article, but I did revert a number of recent promotional edits that were made, including copyrighted marketing pasted directly from your website. The article is still at Onward Technologies, and you can see its edit history by clicking on the history tab at the top. But I strongly suggest that you not edit the article about your company, as it's going to be very difficult for you to maintain the WP:Neutral point of view required for an encyclopaedia. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 12:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Sure... as said I wont. But, i'll revamp the Intro content and the References, as the content pasted are very old and obsolete. Request your comments on this.Thanks --OnwardRavi (talk) 12:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Ravi

Yes please feel free to update out-of-date content, and do let me know if you need a hand with it. Filing Flunky (talk) 12:27, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Sure.. Will update and give a ping... Thanks--OnwardRavi (talk) 12:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I've updated the content. It would be gr8 if you can proof-read it. Thanks--OnwardRavi (talk) 13:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Looks good now, thanks. Filing Flunky (talk) 13:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Gr8. Thanks--OnwardRavi (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

24weekers

Please can you help with an independent proof read of the 24weekers page. All the content and references are from the public domain and in fact dozens of people discuss the film on a daily basis on the 24weekers facebook page. I can assure you there is nothing made up - I would welcome your help and advice. Yes I am a Wikipedia newbie :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Entsal007 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for contributing. I don't think any of it's made up, but the article at the moment doesn't assert notability per Wikipedia:Notability (films), and I can't find significant coverage of it from WP:Reliable sources online, only some local press coverage. The film hasn't been released yet, and once it has been then it may become notable: would you like me to move it to a WP:subpage of your user page for you to work on it and improve it, and to wait until it acquires sufficient notability for inclusion here? Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 15:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Many thanks for your suggestion to create a Bed Blockers article based upon the Sunday Mirror and BBC references already cited in the 24weekers article, perhaps as you suggest with a small section mentioning the film 24weekers currently being covered by local press. Many thanks for all your help and advice. Entsal007 (talk) 07:59, 1 December 2011
Thanks for taking the AFD with such good grace: some editors take that very personally, but I certainly don't mean to cause any offense. I'd be very pleased to help you with the bed blocking article: just ask here for any help you want with that. Filing Flunky (talk) 11:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Please feel free to create a new Bed Blockers article and redirect from 24weekers and Alan Entwistle (director as not sure I would would do the redirects. Again many thanks for all your help and advice. Entsal007 (talk) 17:16, 3 December 2011
OK, I've made a start on a draft at User:Filing Flunky/Bed blocking. Please feel free to expand it: you will probably know a great deal more about it than I do. There are many news articles available for referencing it. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Keeping intial texts safe

Hello Filing, nice to have an opportunity to ask the question I am trying to find the answer since last Friday directly to a Wiki editor! Great, thank you for getting in touch! Please, consider the history of changes at mgid.com page and help me to understand - HOW TO PRESERVE PAGE CONTENT from violating company rights edits? It keeps for 7 days already that we correct the abusive text twice a day. It goes about our reputation, personal rights of our founder who contributed greatly to the development of quality service used by multi partners all over the world! Can you help me? Or just explain why it's so easy to edit content on the company pages officially published at the greatest open enciclopedia in the world? Tasya19 (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes I can see that the page is being vandalized repeatedly, so I've requested semi-protection for that page, over at WP:Requests for page protection. It should be protected shortly, and until it is I'll help you revert the vandalism. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 12:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
The page got protected by a Wikipedia administrator about a minute after I wrote that. That was nice quick work, eh? :-) Filing Flunky (talk) 12:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

mgid.com page

Thanks a lot, Filing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's great and extremely quick - the quickest I have ever seen! I hope our page is save from that moment. Tasya19 (talk) 12:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. :-) Filing Flunky (talk) 12:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Regarding article "Aye Zindagi"

Hi,

This article is 100% correct and authentic, I have given a URL in reference from where you check the authenticity. Please let me in case of issues — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.innovators (talk • contribs) 13:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

The reference given was a description of a film festival, but didn't mention Aye Zindagi. I can't find anything about the film online. Filing Flunky (talk) 14:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

RICHARD E SHAW

Hi Filing Flunky

Hi please could you help me delete the info on user talk !

I made many errors when first starting on wikipedia so I apologise! The below info comes up when I do a search either by wiki or google! if you could please help me delete the info that you left for me on talk I would be gratefull! The page as been deleted but the info below still appears.

again many thanks for your help and guidance!

Derek.

User talk:RICHARD E SHAW - SOCCER PLAYERFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search [edit] WelcomeHello, RICHARD E SHAW - SOCCER PLAYER, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself has been or will shortly be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, but if you want to use the content from it, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (Richard Shaw - Professional soccer / football Player / TV Commentator / NY Soccer Central. 14:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC)); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 10:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccertv1 (talk • contribs)

Hello. I'm not an administrator, so can't delete anything. But I see at your talk page that you've been talking with an administrator, User:RHaworth about this. That editor remains your best person to ask about the deletion. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 14:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


New User D-Wave-Junkie

No conflict, just a fan. Will change username and keep working hard to keep sources verifiable. Thanks for your remarksD-wave-junkie (talk) 11:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)D-wave-junkie

Thanks. Filing Flunky (talk) 11:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Keith-Lee Castle date-of-birth

Hello. The stated d-o-b for Keith-Lee Castle is now known to be wrong - it (and a lot of other false information) was given to one person by someone pretending to be him, and she posted it all over the internet two years ago. A personal friend of his has tried to correct this, as can be seen here: http://www.fanpop.com/spots/keith-lee-castle/articles/7455/title/keith-lee-castle-official-biography http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0145290/board/thread/183877654 It was also pretty much confirmed by his Young Dracula co-star Simon Ludders, on Twitter. LadySilverRoseWolf (talk) 04:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

None of the online sources used so far (including the one I cited) appear to be WP:Reliable sources, and since there's an ongoing dispute over it, it might be best if we simply left the date out altogether. If Mr. Castle wants an "official" birth date to be known, I'm sure it would be simple for him to mention it in an interview, or something similarly WP:Verifiable. Thanks for the heads-up, Filing Flunky (talk) 09:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Thing is, it seems he doesn't do interviews! (the only one I've seen mentioned was from back in 1996). The man likes his privacy... LadySilverRoseWolf (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Alan Entwistle (director) and 24weekers

Hi. The author blanked these after you nominted them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Entwistle (director), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24weekers. He did this in GF although it clearly states that once at AfD articles shold not be blanked. However, as no one has yet voted, if you would like to consider withdrawing the AfDs, I'll delete the articles per the author's request. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah you're right. OK, I'll withdraw the AFDs now. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 10:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hang on: he's not allowed to blank them, as they've had substantial edits from other editors, isn't that right? Filing Flunky (talk) 10:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The edits are not substantial. AFAICS, they are just minor tweaks that are not addItions to content. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Alan Entwistle (director) was created by an IP editor (in 2005, when that was possible). Entsal007's first edit is 4 years later, where he added some filmography. I don't think we can blank Alan Entwistle (director), especially as there's no evidence that he created it. 24weekers is different: only formatting tweaks on that one from other editors, and he's the creator. Filing Flunky (talk) 11:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Ah, yes, you're quite right. If you'd like to remove 24weekers from the AfD I'll delete it. The other one will have to run it's 7 days. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Abhishek Kumar

Hello buddy!

There is reference. I remember my PR people put more before. I guess someone else deleted. My film 5 Ghantey Mien 5 Crore releasing soon. The audio is launching on 10th december 2011 (next weekend). There's articles about it on the internet. Worldwide Records is releasing it. Please if you can put in the references as you seem an expert, it'll be great. I don't know how to do it. And also Abhishek Venkteshwar has different spellings, so why would he want to remove my page and put his in its place when clearly different spellings he has and hence, can make a new page. Please oblige and remove the referencing note you've put on. Thanks buddy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aru2k2005 (talk • contribs) 06:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC) and this is the IMDB reference. IMDB is world's most reliable and respected directory of the people related to film fraternity. :)

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2729743/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aru2k2005 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately IMDB is not regarded as a reliable reference on Wikipedia, as content is user-submitted and therefore not generally reliable. Filing Flunky (talk) 10:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


Kedrosky

Whoa, I just started the article 2 minutes ago. give me a chance to flesh it out and put references in for each claim you're contesting already. Cookiehead (talk) 17:19, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

It was pretty promotional, but the worst of that is gone now, so I'll keep off it until you're done. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes, sorry for the promotional nature of it. SInce the article is just starting, that is often the case as sources are added and tweaked. May I ask how you found this article so quickly? Cookiehead (talk) 17:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
No problem. And I found the article here. Filing Flunky (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Cool, that's a weird coincidence. Normally when I start articles they don't get noticed for at least a day or so. Was just curious. That's a big list. Cookiehead (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, and editing it is like dipping a teaspoon into Niagara Falls... :-) Filing Flunky (talk) 17:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Bullying hurts and has a great effect on us all

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <Listen plz im french but i want to do it englich cuz of the impact plz go look what happen in quebec with our children if im not good writer plz someone rewrote it iwant this article made for a good purpose go see Marjorie Raymond in news she have commit suicide after suffer 3 years of bullying this phenomena up to recently was taboo so plz if someone wanna help rewrote it its for the good of our child tks

and plz give me an answer i appreciate>. — Dreamofpeaceinschool (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamofpeaceinschool (talk • contribs)

Marjorie Raymond's death was certainly newsworthy in her area, but the web content on YouTube that you wrote about wasn't notable enough for its own article. May I suggest that you add some referenced content about her and the YouTube incident to School bullying? Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 18:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


mm ya ok i gonna go sleep and after i gonna see if i can insert something in the article you suggested we are 5 december 2011 Dreamofpeaceinschool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamofpeaceinschool (talk • contribs) 20:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

C.L._Washbrook

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.L._Washbrook Jesus Christ! Stop IT! You are frakking with loads of decent articles about important people. Does it make you feel big? The references are complete. It is a complete page. Fully referenced and linked! END THIS INSANITY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WheatyNCC (talk • contribs) 20:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Please have a read of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion: the discussion needs to run its course for at least a week. Please stop deleting the AFD notices from the article: it's considered vandalism, and you'll get blocked for this if you continue. Filing Flunky (talk) 20:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

A little help with notability here?

Can you help me a little with notability? I attempted to make the Intellum, Inc. article notable.. explaining what they do different. I'm not sure why this one is getting tagged for notability problems while Cornerstone OnDemand isn't. Can you explain the difference to me?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Medra42 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for contributing. The guidelines for notability of companies are over at WP:CORP. There's not much in the article yet explaining why the company is notable, and I can't find much online about it (under the new or old name) from independent sources. The Cornerstone OnDemand article, on the other hand asserts endorsements (with references) from three notable tech research companies, and a quick search on Google News yields a great deal of coverage of the company and their product from independent sources. Both articles are rather short at the moment, but can be expanded. Can you find more in-depth coverage of Intellum from WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources online showing why it's notable (which is not necessarily the same thing as famous), or are there paper press clippings that you could scan and upload? Please let me know if I can help with this. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 07:47, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I see your point about the awards & accolades for CornerStone OnDemand, and the sources. And I can definitely see that Cornerstone has more Google News results.
But, can you tell me why the Bersin & Associates reference, The Brandon Hall Group reference, and the 37signals reference do not come close to signaling a notable organization? I understand that they're not equal, but they're all independent sources. In addition, Bersin & Associates and The Brandon Hall Group are both research organizations.
I've read the specs a few times, and I can see the scale and why CornerStone OnDemand has better sources, but I'm having trouble understanding why the Intellum, Inc. page isn't notable at all. Independent 3rd parties have definitely covered the company.
--Medra42 (talk) 13:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
It's a bit of a gray area. I don't know anything about the Brandon Hall Group or Bersin & Associates, so can't comment on whether they're independent of the company, etc. Notability just looks a bit borderline so far, as the coverage from reliable, independent sources isn't substantial, and the article could use improvement in that respect. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 14:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Twitter status message Template

This is a template to generate a direct link to the Twitter status message. You can use this template to navigate directly to the Tweet or to refer someone directly to any Tweet in your wiki. You can use this template freely wherever you need to refer any tweets/twitter users of Twitter#Features for your external references or some other places. --Jenith Michael Raj (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Twitter_status

Why are you telling me this? Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 08:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

This is just for the notification. If you want to refer any tweets in your wiki page, you can use this template. --Jenith Michael Raj (talk) 08:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Spamming random editors about your new template is a bad idea. Please don't do this. Many new templates are created every day. If yours is well categorized, editors will find it. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 08:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Modified speedy rationale on History of Wingspan Editors

I modified the speedy deletion rationale you placed on History of Wingspan Editors, as substantive content was added to the article after you tagged it and it no longer qualifies under A3. However, the article does appear to be about a group of people with no credible claim to notability; therefore, I have replaced the tag you left with an A7 tag. The article was deleted per A7 a year ago today. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

pelton article

your quick, I was still in the middle of making that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llangarlia (talk • contribs) 10:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Anytime pal. :-) Filing Flunky (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

闾丘露薇

The above article (which falls under BLP) did not contain a single reference when the Speedy delete was nominated, therefore the speedy delete request was valid. GimliDotNet (talk) 11:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Actually WP:BLPPROD is valid for unreferenced BLPs. But you nominated it for speedy deletion on the grounds Template:Db-person, which should only ever be used for "an article about a real person that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." Please have a read of WP:CSD: it's important to tag for speedy deletion only articles that fall under the speedy deletion criteria. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
My mistake, I have missed the key bit even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. GimliDotNet (talk) 13:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks by the way, for all the good work you're doing on new pages and recent changes: much appreciated! Filing Flunky (talk) 14:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Daw Plug-ins

Why was my article deleted? It was informative and explained the wealth of options available to Musicians setting up a home studio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leahmirade (talk • contribs) 19:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Have a look at the top of the article: it hasn't been deleted yet. It's mostly a paste of copyrighted text from http://www.sweetwater.com/feature/daw/plugins.php, with an external links added to the sales page of some company. Filing Flunky (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, sir. You are trying to delete the article "V.G. Varun" for no real reason. Please give a reason. The research is original and legitimate, and if don't like the formatting, you can fix it if you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morshuweegee (talk • contribs) 22:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

South Carolina Research Authority

New editor, same edits. Blocked. Feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Palmettotriumph  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Since the puppeteer had been blocked for vandalism, I was waiting for one of the existing SPs to edit before starting the SPI, but she started a new SP while I wasn't looking. Much obliged for you hoovering them all up. Filing Flunky (talk) 09:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
No problem, I don't often do SPIs, but this one was quacking so loud. I suspect the autoblocks might keep her at bay for a day or so, it's not unreasonable to think she might be back. Page is semi-protected for editing (so any new editor will have to get autoconfimed first), and fully protected against moving.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks. Filing Flunky (talk) 17:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Fine Chemicals

Hi Filing Flunky I wanted to let you know, that I am the author of the mentioned book. I've further edited the article tody since I've sent an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and added {{OTRS pending}} to the discussion page. I hope that's fine.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterRPollak (talk • contribs)

Danish cuisine

Hello Filing Flunky. Thank you for taking an interest in this article. I am however rather surprised that my main article on New Danish cuisine was deleted before I had a chance to respond. I can assure you that I have absolutely no interest in advertising anything to do with Danish cooking or the restaurants or chefs associated with it. I firmly believe that the article was written objectively with reliable sources. For people outside Denmark to understand how this trend has developed, I tried to give some background on the political support the initiatives of a couple of Danish chefs received. For some reason, someone must have thought this was advertising. Maybe the article contained some superlatives which could have been somewhat toned down but when a restaurant has been listed as the best in the world two years in a row, it is difficult to avoid saying so. I would be interested in having your reactions so that future articles are not deleted without allowing me time to react. - Ipigott (talk) 20:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Actually I placed a tag at the top of New Danish cuisine, noting that it was written like an advert, but the only response to that was a few new links placed. It's possible though to write a promotional article unintentionally, out of sheer enthusiasm for a subject. If you'd like me to edit your draft copy at User:Ipigott/Sandbox2 for a more WP:Neutral point of view, please do ask. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 22:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I left a message at the deleting admin's talk page requesting it to be restored given that speedy deletion seems to me to have been excessive. I think a regular AfD would have given the editor the chance to respond and improve. --Elekhh (talk) 23:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes I would definitely have taken it to AFD, had there not been an identical copy in the user's sandbox. But in its current state it reads like pure marketing copy from the Danish tourist board, so definitely didn't belong in mainspace. I've re-written the similar additions on New Danish cuisine that were added to Danish cuisine, but the deleted article needed almost a complete re-write. The useful referenced content remaining in the sandbox copy can be used for the necessary WP:NPOV re-write and added back to mainspace, so no content has been lost, and I don't see what's left for the deleting admin to do. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 07:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you both for taking such a reasonable view of the matter. What surprised me most was that I had only been away from Wikipedia for a couple of hours before I saw a message on my talk page inviting me to react but it was already too late: the article already was a red link. In any case, I can understand that for someone who has not been following culinary trends in Scandinavia over the past few years, the article might well look as if it had been written by the Danish tourist board (and I believe there was in fact a link to a VisitDenmark article about the Michelin-starred restaurants in Copenhagen as I could not find the original Michelin source). On the other hand, I think the political history needs to be explained, especially as it was not just Denmark who supported this initiative but food and agriculture ministers from all the Nordic Council countries: Iceland, Finland, Norway, Sweden, the Faroes, Greenland and the Aaland Islands. I also realize that it might have been preferable to rewrite the main items from the Manifesto in running prose style but I also thought it important to reproduce the original text. A reference including a link to one of the original versions would probably have been sufficient though. I'm not sure where we go from here. Would you, Filing Flunky like to go ahead with an edited version as you suggested earlier? I could also try to increase objectivity by, for example, including new images from other restaurants and perhaps, with time, expand on developments in the other countries. The alternative would be to condense some of the content and include it in the main Danish cuisine article. Please let me know. (I see that Peridon has not yet reacted. Let's hope he restores the article enabling further editing.) - Ipigott (talk) 09:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for your helpful reply. May I suggest that we instead work on User:Ipigott/Sandbox2, and get it into shape for copying back to main article space? Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Done. Have a look at it and let me know whether you think further changes are needed. Feel free to introduce them yourself. I've also left a word on Peridon's page. - Ipigott (talk) 10:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC) (PS. I was surprised to see that the sandbox version had 58 page views yesterday. Better than most new articles!) - Ipigott (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
I've added some links and edited for what I believe to be more neutral tone: please let me know what you think. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 12:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks very much for all your patience and hard work. Your prompting tags have also been useful. I have been encouraged on my talk page to go into more detail in connection with restaurant trends, for example explaining how some of the historic royal inns have adapted to the new trend and how other restaurants in the provinces are increasingly serving new cuisine dishes. For now, though, I think it is far more important to provide a general overview and I am therefore quite happy to leave the article in its present state for a while. I would also like to see what authentic Danish Wikipedians have to contribute. You included a tag at the top of the draft with a "submit" button. I don't know whether that was intentional or indeed whether I should use it? Normally those whose articles have been deleted are not encouraged to resubmit them - unless I am mistaken. I've also asked Peridon for advice on how to proceed. Hope I have the pleasure of working together with you again some day. - Ipigott (talk) 14:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy to have helped: sorry that my communication was far too terse at first. I've learned a useful lesson here. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 15:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Warofdreams

I'm trying to contact Warofdreams about the addition of the British Freedom party in the list of other UK parties and to make her aware that the party does in fact have at least one local councillor(Phil Scott) in West Norfolk, and several whose acquaintance I haven't yet made. I didn't see the revision until after I added the party today and did a check. Sorry but this is all rather new to me:-( The business with the jpeg of Mr choudary was just an experiment which I thought I had undone without saving, but obviously I hadn't. However I believe my sentiments weren't misplaced all the same. Thanks

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenpenwriter (talk • contribs) 16:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what you're asking for here, but you can contact Warofdreams at User talk:Warofdreams. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Dotbrodu's user talk page archive

It looks like we stepped on each other's toes on this one. I'm pretty sure the talk page archive belongs at User talk:Dotbrodu/archive 1 but I can't move it anymore. I'll put a G6 tag on it. —KuyaBriBriTalk 23:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, looks like you're right. Thanks for the G6 and for cc-ing me. Filing Flunky (talk) 23:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

---slb~ (talk) 18:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Anthony, Nairobi: REFERENCES FOR THIS BOOK

  1. Do I use this book as a reference of itself? This page is based on a book title 'The River Between' by Ngugi wa Thiong'o. Should I use this book as the reference material for the creation and modification of this page?
  1. Some of the review materials have factual and application contents related to this page, unfortunately they happen to be in the Wikipedia blacklist. What do I do to cite this information?
  1. An example is the review by Azmi Jahan at EzineArticles.com/?expert=Azmi_Jahan.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Karani (talk • contribs) 18:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
We need to add WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources for the book, but it's also a good idea to cite from the book itself where appropriate. I've just added one reference, and am looking for more. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 18:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Abhishek Kumar

Filing Flunky. I'll give you the news references for Abhishek Kumar soon. You please check them and add. His film is releasing soon. Do you have a personal thing against Abhishek Kumar? There's so many fake actors on wikipedia but you keep deleting the one who's genuine even after there's been proper references? Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 06:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

You know what you are doing is Destructive Editing. Instead of finding the facts and making the article more informative, you are deleting it when there's enough references. Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 06:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

If there are articles on Wikipedia about "fake actors", then they should be deleted too. The article you re-created was deleted following an WP:AFD discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kumar, where the WP:Consensus reached was for deletion on the grounds that he's not notable yet. Your latest re-creation of the article, with a slightly altered title in an attempt to get around the creation block placed by administrators at Abhishek Kumar and Abhishek kumar, contained the same references as the last several you created. When he's notable, an article can be written about him. Until then, please quit trying to re-create the article: it will just get deleted again, and you're creating needless extra work for the administrators. Filing Flunky (talk) 22:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Mind what you say before talking. If you were a responsible "administrator" that you claim to be, you would know I created it as Abhishek Kumar and one of your administrators changed the name to Abhishek Kumar (Actor). I guess you are just Abhishek Venkteshwar's Public Relations Officer who's annoyed that his page wasn't good enough to be put on the net. Get a life dude!! Your adminitrator changed the name. "Do check" and then speak. And what do you know about notability? Haha...look who's talking.

Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 03:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm not an administrator, and neither is User:Dr meetsingh. He, not an administrator, moved the userspace draft you created at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abhishek Kumar to the new name, after your undeletion request was turned down. This was evidently a well-meant attempt on Dr meetsingh's part to help someone that he didn't realise was User:Aru2k2005, posting WP:Vanity pages about yourself again under a new account in an attempt to avoid getting blocked for disruptive editing after your User talk:Aru2k2005#Repost of Abhishek kumar. You have apparently abused Dr meetsingh's trust. The problems with the article have already been explained to you here and at the deletion discussion. Please stop re-posting it. Filing Flunky (talk) 07:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

HAHA!!! Posting about myself?? Live in the present dude....stop dreaming...obviously you can't be administrator..you're venkteshwar's hired person...you are just free person who's there to delete out references from the articles and delete them. I checked your history. get a life man...there's better things to do in this world. Dr. Meet Singh doesn't think his trust is broken. Its just trying to pretend to be a cool nice guy which you are not. Go take off your mask and be responsible of editing articles on wikipedia. It's not your home or your territory. Lol funny people here man. Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 07:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Couldn't see?? This is your last warning. IMDB is not a great source as you said and the articles on the internet don't have the names of the actors you are adding. Stop making these irresponsible changes to articles. Didn't you see the explaination I wrote?????? Stop lying on the talk pages. you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 16:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Your "deletion warning" to me is wholly inappropriate, since you not only deleted my IMDB reference, but also the perfectly valid Times of India reference. Please WP:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Your disruptive editing and edit-warring is going to get you blocked by an admin. Filing Flunky (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

See buddy, it feels so good if you edit a page in a nice way as you did on Paanch Ghantey Mien Paanch Crore. Working together is always good. PLus there's no reason for us to fight. :) Take care Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Your sockpuppetry has been noted at WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/Aru2k2005. Please stop your disruptive editing, or you will be blocked. Filing Flunky (talk) 20:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Beny Steinmetz

Hi Filing Flunky, I hope this gets to you as I'm finding wikipedia very confusing as a new member. I'm responding to your comment re my changes to your entry on Beny Steinmetz. Sorry not to contact you in advance but I was sure how to do that, no offence was intended. There are a number of factual errors in your article:

Beny is not CEO of the BSG group, he has no executive role beyond being an advisor

He is not CEO of Simfer, which is 95% owned by Rio Tinto - a rival of BSGR as BSGR acquired 50% of Rio's Simandou project in Guinea after Rio was forced to relinquish it by the Govt of Guinea. As far as I'm aware he has never been connected to Simfer

DiamondWorks is not a partner of BSG. BSGR has owned Koidu 100% since Feb 2007. BSG entered Koidu via a JV with Energem in 2003. I suggest that DiamondWorks' involvement pre-dates Energem and therefore BSG.

He does not personally own Cunico. BSGR and a company called IMR jointly own Cunico

He never owned Katanga. He was one of the founders and shareholders of Nikanor plc which was listed in London but then acquired by Katanga Mining in Jan 2008 - Beny's involvement ended with that acquisition.

I'm not sure about STI and Scorpio but have not heard of them in connection to BSG.

Beny is a resident of Switzerland not Israel.

Hence my changes, although I acknowledge that I probably haven't referenced the information correctly as I've not posted on Wikipedia before.

Regards

Bendavid46! 13:17pm 17 December 2011

About The Blue Symphony Page

Hi There, we just Atarted to write about "The Blue Symphony"Page and we received Email and Deletation Happened ! even , we didn't have time to put links and Additional Info about link you can visit Creator of Art work "Amir Shayesteh Tabar"Link Pls. give us time to improve the Page Thanks in Advance, Olga Stroganova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluesym (talk • contribs) 23:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for contribution

Hi There,

Thanks for Helping us for improving Blue Symphony Art Movement by Amir

I'm doing my Best now to improve a page. 

I have to say that am new here and hope to have your support and modification

However, many thanks again for your support.

Olga — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almamir (talk • contribs) 09:05, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Canadian online media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links to West coast and East coast
Gordon Waterman Chaplin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Nassau
Mahendra Gaur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Indian
SmartWay Transport Partnership (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Diesel
Uijeongbu High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Public school

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. Filing Flunky (talk) 16:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Lockbox for Keys Verse Real-Estate Lock Box

I mulled over whether to edit Real-Estate Lock Box or start a new topic and decided that the title Real-Estate Lock Box was too limited since lock boxes aren't just for the real estate industry. Since I'm new I wasn't sure which was the best way to go. What do you think would be best? Also, thank you for letting me know about the Google Cites, I will keep that in mind for the future.

Thank you for your help, --EOHeat (talk) 22:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Maybe it should be re-titled as Key Safe? Is there an easy way to do that?--EOHeat (talk) 07:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

We can rename it with a WP:Page move, but let's put some thought into the best name for this, so we don't leave too many redirects lying around. What is the most common usage for this type of product, both in the US and in the rest of the English-speaking world? Might take a bit of digging to find that out. What are they used for, apart from realtors in the US? Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 17:50, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, looks like another editor deleted it, so I'll rework it and give more thought about the name and try again. --EOHeat (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

dinkus virus

the dinkus virus is not a hoax, it is a real and legitimate illness that is being spread around palm beach county florida. please stop posting a speedy deletion request. This flu wouldn't be such a joke to you if you had to endure the pain it causes. I know that pain, and it is all too real. The Dinkus virus is far from fake, and it should be treated as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigboyd1206 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

That sounds just terrible. Let's see some references. Filing Flunky (talk) 00:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for Intellum, Inc.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Intellum, Inc.. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Medra42 (talk) 01:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

re List Of Katy Perry Songs

The article creating is contesting on the ground that Rihanna discography and List of Rihanna songs both exist, so same deal with this article and Katy Perry discography. Whether that's valid or not I don't know... could you restore the article into my userspace so I can take a peek at it? Herostratus (talk) 06:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, sorry I forgot to reply. I'm not an admin, but the deleting admin was User:Fastily, whom I'm sure would be happy to restore it to a user subpage for you. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 22:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

One Beautiful World - up for Speedy Deletion

Hello, a page I'd created, One Beautiful World, has been marked for deletion. I'm somewhat new at this, and ask that you push the page off Wiki and into a draft area where I can continue to bring it up to standard. I'm not quite sure where the article is lacking, can you point me to some reading where I can get smart on Wiki standards? Much thanks .. Glenn G H Smith (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I've posted some links to your user talk page to get you started. The article was deleted by an administrator, User:DGG: if you ask them, I'm sure they'll be glad to restore the deleted article to a WP:Subpage of your user page so you can work on it for as long as you like. Please feel free to ask here if I can be of any help with it. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Filing Flunky. You have new messages at A520's talk page.
Message added 11:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 11:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Re. vandalism at foodborne illness

Is there any known good revision we can keep going back to? I'm doing my best to fix them, but with so many edit conflicts, it's difficult to do fast enough. A lot of the reverts have missed parts of the vandalism that were done consecutively, so it's not safe to revert back to them.  dalahäst (talk) 22:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

09:01, 17 December 2011, as far as I can tell. Thanks! Filing Flunky (talk) 22:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Hurray, it's been protected.  dalahäst (talk) 22:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Football in Goa

Hello I would just like to ask why you merged the category Football in Goa with the category Football in India becuase I was planning on adding many other things relating to football in the state of Goa in that category. I will wait for your reply before recreating the category. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello: only because the category didn't exist yet. Sorry if that wasn't helpful of me: I'll create Category:Football in Goa now, as I can see it's definitely needed. Thanks! Filing Flunky (talk) 15:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Done, and populated with about a dozen articles and sub-categories so far. Hope that's useful. Filing Flunky (talk) 15:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks mate! You are now an official helper to the Indian Football Wikipedia Pages Project, hahaha but really thank you very much mate. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Mathematicians: criteria of notability

Each person you mentioned in my talk was an invited speaker at International_Congress_of_Mathematicians (in different years, Victor Ivrii twice)) which alone seem to meet such criteria and as a reliable and secondary source I put Official List of Speaker 1887-present day. I definitely can add the titles of their talks.

Some of them are also Fellows of Royal Society of Canada which could be verified on Member Search; by some reason full list is not available. Several are also Killam Fellows List of Killam Fellows and I believe that each of these meets such criteria.

I can research about their scientific contributions but it will not be fast. Kot Obormot (talk) 23:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

They do sound notable, thanks for the explanation. No rush on this: please let me know if I can help find references. Filing Flunky (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vaagai Soodavaa Seenu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tamil and Telugu
Hart (district) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Halifax (bank)
Maheshwari Public School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Public school
USP Networks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Multitasking

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. Filing Flunky (talk) 20:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Association for Promotion of Creative Learning Conflict of Interest

Thanks - Filing Flunky for your comments on the page - Association for Promotion of Creative Learning. Yes, I am associated with the organisation, however, not officially. I think my knowledge about the organisation would be critical in writing a fair thesis on the same. In my opinion, unless there is a fair contradiction that an editor can point out, it would be probably unfair to ask a contributor not to contribute articles on Wikipedia. Please suggest as to whether I should continue editing the article or leave it entirely. I can do both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by H mayank (talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. The tone is rather promotional at the moment: it may be difficult for you to write objectively about an organization for which you have such evident enthusiasm. You might like to have a read of WP:Neutral point of view for tips on how to word descriptions in a more neutral way. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 16:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Great vandal fighting, catching the User:Ajinkyadon3 vandal account, and finding the Facebook page that documented everything. Awesome work! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 16:39, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! :-) Filing Flunky (talk) 17:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

CSD A10

Hi there! In most cases, instead of tagging, you can actually simply redirect the page to the other, existing article and save the content from deletion outright. This is often what the page creator intends to do (i.e. copying and pasting old content to a new page title thinking it is redirecting the new page title). Thanks for your hard work! — Joseph Fox 09:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, will do, thanks. Filing Flunky (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

eric koloko

thanks for helping my page out,can you do me a favor a wikipedian user named minimac has labled my article on koloko for deletion .i thought anyone who competed at the olympics is notable ,can you review my article thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marquette984 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

I've removed the proposed deletion tag on Eric Koloko, and explained why on Talk:Eric Koloko. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 14:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Review Article:First Step Back Home

Dear Editor,

I'd request you to review First Step Back Home as I have expanded the article with 2 new sections and enough references from secondary sources. could you provide your feedback on it, or consider removing the header notation regarding Notability.

Thanks. Salman Gurung 10:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsujata (talk • contribs)

Yes I've removed the tag, thanks for the improvements. I've also edited it for WP:Neutral point of view. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your cooperation. Salman Gurung 11:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsujata (talk • contribs)

Uprising Sistan (Persian date Bahman 19 1330)

Persian Journal article on my talk page. I thank you from the infinite. This article is of great value to me. Thank you sanchooli (talk) 15:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

The new article

Hi, I'm a recent article entitled "Uprising Sistan (Bahman 19 1330)" The proposed building and to remove my previous article. Please, please check. Thank you. sanchooli (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I've moved the original to 1330 Sistan uprising, in order to preserve its edit history and avoid the use of parentheses in the title. Thanks, Filing Flunky (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, my good friend.sanchooli (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Filing_Flunky/Archives&oldid=1136188271"