User talk:Finkrek

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Finkrek, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andrey Esionov, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrey Esionov[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrey Esionov, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.esionov.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Andrey Esionov[edit]

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Finkrek, thanks for creating Andrey Esionov!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please insert references giving evidence of the national awards mentioned. This would help demonstrate WP:NOTABILITY. Is there an image that just shows him?? The merged images don't contribute to the article at all.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 12:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Andrey Esionov article[edit]

Hello Finkrek. When editing Wikipedia articles please take care not to remove markup code such as "{{reflist}}", as you did at Andrey Esionov. This code causes the references to appear in the correct location, under a heading such as "References". Also please do not remove "tags" such as {{BLP sources}} without attending to the problem to which the tag is drawing attention: Noyster (talk), 18:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. S Philbrick (Talk) 18:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Andrey Esionov has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Amortias (T)(C) 20:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need help[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Working on article about Andrey Esionov. There're tags "No footnotes", "Orphan" and "BLP sources". Added several refs, put a link from the page List of Russian artists. Can I remove them now?

The main problem that I met, is that there's only a few articles and pages translated into English. For example, English version of Russian Academy of Arts website doesn't contain information about Esionov's membership. But this information can be found on russian version of this website. In this case I put a reference link to russian version. Is it correct? I looked through some modern british artists' articles and I found references to not-english websites several times.

Being on a list of foo doesn't really mean it's not an orphan any longer. Please allow an unaffiliated editor to assess the article and tags. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi! Can I ask somebody to check my article about Andrey Esionov? Does it still need tags "No footnotes", "Orphan" and "BLP sources"? Or they can be removed?

The same issues still apply, so the tags remain. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I put more links from other articles. Added "Membership" section in Russian Academy of Arts and put a link there to a new article named Corresponding Members of the Russian Academy of Arts. Then added a link to Andrey Esionov. Is it possible to remove "Orphan" tag?) Update: criteria for linking. Well, article has 5 links now and accordingly to these criteria "lists of" count as links for de-orphaning. So, сan I remove this tag now?

Don't quite understand what to do with "no footnotes" tag. Each paragraph in the article has at least 1 footnote. Can you give me an example of a part of text that I should provide with a footnote? Or may be the problem is with the list of external links - they are not clearly connected to any statement if the article - may be I should delete them so that it would be possible to remove the tag? Finkrek (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]