User talk:Fred.jp

Hello, Fred.jp, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 12:23, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2024

Your recent editing history at Yasuke shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grayfell (talk) 01:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Silver seren^C 02:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Yasuke) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT

Hello Fred.jp, the idea announced in the edit summary of Special:Diff/1237077456, If the controversy section is removed again, I will consider removing lines in the main section that seem controversial too, appears to be a good example of disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point. So even when the block expires, and in other articles, please avoid this approach. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:22, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ONUS

Also, the statement in Special:Diff/1237069097, Discuss any removal on the talk page first, is incompatible with the verifiability policy, which places both the burden of evidence and the onus to obtain a consensus on those who favor inclusion (you) rather than those who favor removal (the others). Unless you have obtained the necessary consensus at Talk:Yasuke and are providing reliable sources, re-addition of the disputed content is prohibited. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Please do not make bad faith assumption and threat of vandalism as per your edit summary of this edit. We don't take language like this lightly. If poor civility become a pattern of yours, you may face a complete account block instead of a much restrained topic ban. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 02:27, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]