User talk:Fredchaslin

Welcome!

Hello, Fredchaslin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chaslin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO ^{ACCIDENT &}_EMERGENCY 20:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chaslin

The article Chaslin has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GILO ^{ACCIDENT &}_EMERGENCY 20:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Chaslin

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Chaslin. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Frédéric Chaslin. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Frédéric Chaslin - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hello there. I have undid your last edit to Frédéric Chaslin because it removed content sourced to reliable sources. If you have any issues about the information portrayed in this article, please feel free to contact me here on this page, on my talk page, or on the article's talk page. You may wish to read our policy on Biographies of living people (BLP). If you would like an uninvolved opinion, consider going to our BLP help page or contacting our volunteer response team. Thank you. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am the person of mentionned in this article and I don't like the fact that the last line reffers to my previous private pas. How can I update this? It is not fair to my new wife that your site says I'm still with the previous one. Thanks

Usually, we don't remove information that has been confirmed by reliable sources until it is contradicted by newer sources. In this case, if the subject was indeed married to one person, and we confirmed that, then we'd need a newer source that says "No, he remarried this person". This is usually a protection for the subject, since otherwise anyone could post anything about them without proper verification. In this case, it appears to be causing some concern, for which I apologize. If your new marriage has been noted anywhere in the press, or in another reliable source, could you provide a link to the source so we can update the article? Failing that, if you would be so kind as to verify your identity with our volunteer response team, they could evaluate whether we can update your status in relation to your first marriage, even in the absence of a source. As Fiftytwo thirty indicated, above, the VRT is a good resource, as they deal with people who are the subjects of articles all the time. Good luck, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Diva Dance was inspired. Well done. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is the subject of a request emailed to the Volunteer Response Team (VRT).

Issues identified are: Identity confirmed
The VRTS ticket number is 2010100510005546.

Please discuss these issues here, being mindful of the policies on biographies of living persons.