User talk:Frys104
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You blanked out my user page and left a message that said I cannot edit "your page". This is patent nonsense- Wikipedia articles do not belong to any one user, and if you continue blanking pages, which is considered vandalism, you will be blocked from making edits to Wikipedia.
If you continue making edits like these, you can and will be permanantly banned from Wikipedia. --Firsfron 13:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
The advert tag on the Bashas' article is because it was a clear case of advertising. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; Wikipedia is not an ad. Please do not remove avert tags on ANY page until the advertising has been removed, and please do not place an avert tag on MY user page because you are unhappy with Wikipedia policy. That is vandalism, and if you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia articles. Thanks, --Firsfron 05:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:
- Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
- You can experiment in the test area.
- You can get help at the Help Desk
- Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.
Sockpuppetry case[edit]
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Frys104 for evidence. Please, make sure you make yourself familliar with notes for the suspect before editing evidence page. Dijxtra 17:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Bashas-Logo-building.jpg[edit]
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bashas-Logo-building.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 14:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kscm.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Kscm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
File:FCAJ.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FCAJ.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FCAJ.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:FCAJ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Bagdad-Bashas-building.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned image, no encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Fry's-Food-building.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, low-res, no obvious use. Replaceable with files at c:Category:Fry's Food and Drug.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)