User talk:GGFox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Kostyantyn Efymenko Charitable Foundation has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kostyantyn Efymenko Charitable Foundation. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kostyantyn Efymenko Charitable Foundation (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm not convinced that being given an honor by a local council really establishes notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GGFox! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin Bilski[edit]

Hello GGFox,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Benjamin Bilski for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Diptanshu 💬 09:54, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome...[edit]

Hello, GGFox, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Diptanshu 💬 10:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Some pages you might like to check out are:

Citation footnotes

Use the <ref> tag to add references to your articles presented as footnotes. This tag is easy and convenient because it allows you to cite your sources within your text and have them automatically numbered and added to your References section at the end of the article. To cite a source, simply type the <ref> tag after the statement the reference is for.

For example: Haliburton park is the largest park in the world.<ref>Bill Harton (2005). http://www.linkhere.com. Retrieved March 3, 2005.</ref> Then, at the end of your article, add the following template to include all of the citations in your article: {{Reflist}} directly under the References or Notes section title.

Read more:
Become a Wikipedia tipster
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Please get oriented with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Feel free to contact me. Diptanshu 💬 10:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Diptanshu Das Thank You so much for Your References and help GGFox (talk) 10:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—  BrandonALF   (talk) 14:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Bilski has been accepted[edit]

Benjamin Bilski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Diptanshu 💬 04:09, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?[edit]

Information icon

Hello GGFox. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:GGFox. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GGFox|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Cwmhiraeth Hello. I want to say that I am not an employee of the companies that are cited in the materials I'm editing in the English, Ukrainian and Russian segments of Wikipedia. I am also not a contractor of these companies. Therefore, I have no conflict of interest. I write articles for Wikipedia and make edits to a variety of materials in order to more fully clarify the topic in different languages. My work concerns those areas where I feel that I have a tolerable level of expertise. For example, this is the history and current situation in Ukraine, the corporations of Bila Tserkva, water sports and the development of the crypto industry. In addition, I try to make edits, referring to authoritative media sources. I think that the nature of my editing, although it often concerns a narrow range of topics, but is not advertising texts. For example, now I want to add to the article about Naga AG a critical mention of this material https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-26/another-trading-probe-makes-deutsche-boerse-s-bad-year-worse If you still have questions about my activities on Wikipedia, please feel free to ask me here GGFox (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Special measures apply to blockchain and cryptocurrency related pages[edit]

Information icon Hello, GGFox. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.


Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 13:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NAGA Group AG[edit]

Notice

The article NAGA Group AG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No RS coverage, most refs are non-RSes, no evidence of WP:CORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 09:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NAGA Group AG for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NAGA Group AG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NAGA Group AG until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 08:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 20:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GGFox&oldid=1061130512"