User talk:GStojanov

Welcome!

Hello, GStojanov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Balkan Fever 07:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called GStojanov. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name GStojanov~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

13:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your old talkpage[edit]

Hi, seeing that you copy-pasted the contents of User talk:GStojanov~enwiki here, and assuming you are indeed the same editor, I've moved that old talkpage here instead via a proper pagemove. This way, the history of the page will remain more transparent. Thanks, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am the same user. Thank you. I have not done much editing since 2009, so I am a bit rusty on the syntax. GStojanov (talk) 14:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GStojanov, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi GStojanov! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 20:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

This actually is not an original research. It is simply a citation from a book from a renowned Bulgarian geographer, ethnographer and politician Vasil Kanchov. An entire paragraph is cited. This is an important testimony from a contemporary expert on Macedonia and its ethnographic situation. GStojanov (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved: The edit was accepted and improved by other wiki users. GStojanov (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My name is G.Stojanov too. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What a conincidence. :) I hope we can work well to collect and edit materials about Macedonian matters. GStojanov (talk) 14:21, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:OrohidrografijaNaMakedonijaPocetnaStranica.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:OrohidrografijaNaMakedonijaPocetnaStranica.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Prespa Barnstar
		Thank you for your hard work on with the 2019 Macedonia Name RFC. We finally rewrote Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Macedonia), and your suggestions were both important and appreciated. You made some really excellent requests. and it's thanks to you we were able to fine tune the language. I am glad to have had the great pleasure to work with you! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice [edit]

Hey GStojanov, ummm... you probably should not have made this move because there has been an ongoing discussion on the article title. It also does not meet current naming conventions for elections (20XX COUNTRY NAME X Elections) are I'll be putting in a request to revert that move. No harm done, so cheers! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice the discussion. I was trying to clean up the adjectives as per WP:NCMAC.GStojanov (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I gotcha there, but the standard process is going through WP:RM especially for highly sensitive topics like this. Also, I am posting an alert to this talk page. It's just procedural and to ensure you are aware of the arbitration committee discretionary sanctions for Eastern Europe related topics. It should help with informing you of the history of this controversy on Wikipedia (link).

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and thank you. GStojanov (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS/Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it[edit]

Please stop misrepresenting the WP:NCMAC guideline. There is nothing in it saying that we should "avoid adjectival references where possible". That was most definitely not what was agreed on. You are reading things into the guideline that are simply not there, just for the sake of pushing your own personal preferences through. And the result of your edits is often grossly ungrammatical, as in the recent edit you tried to edit-war [1] into Visa requirements for European Union citizens. This needs to stop; consider yourself warned. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the expression: "North Macedonia's" is ungrammatical. It is a possessive form [2], and it is constructed properly. I think you are using overly strong words for a minor issue. GStojanov (talk) 13:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't sense why the wording you put in that particular example was horrible English, you really lack the linguistic competence to judge any matter of English usage at all. But that's not the main point. The main point, which you have studiously avoided in your response, is that you have been blatantly misrepresenting the contents of the guideline. That's not a minor issue; it's either crass incompetence or willful disruption. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the WP:NCMAC we have four sentences that restrict that adjectival uses, and one that permits its use. If you believe that in this case the adjectival reference should be used, you should write that and explain why. Instead you are questioning my competence, and you are using hyperbolas like "grossly ungrammatical" for an expression that is grammatically correct. How does this add to a constructive co-editing? GStojanov (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. No, in the relevant section of NCMAC there is not a single sentence "restricting" that adjectival use (apart from the trivially obvious fact that we don't use it if and when we are referring to official names that happen to not contain it). There are several sentences stating that the Prespa agreement restricts it, but then we immediately go on to say that we don't follow that rule. And where the hell did I say that the adjectival form should be used? What on earth is so difficult to comprehend about the simple idea that the guideline allows both forms? ~ Oh, and I'm also not at all interested in supporting "constructive co-editing" with people like you. All I'm interested in right now is to get the message across to you that you shouldn't be editing in this field, if your English and your reading comprehension is that poor. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I may chime in here, GStojanov you certainly are a well-meaning editor. Your contributions to the drafting process were also greatly appreciated by me. However, these characterizations by Fut.Perf. are not entirely off-base nor unfair. We are currently still debating adjectival references and constructions, and I don't think you are making things any easier in this regard. If I may humbly suggest maybe staying away from Macedonia-related topics for a while? It's just a suggestion. I know that is one of your favorite areas to edit, so I don't say that lightly. (talk page watcher) (edit conflict) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. GStojanov (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved here from my talkpage. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are doubting that "North Macedonian" is semantically equivalent to "North Macedonia's", look into this article["https://www.reuters.com/article/us-north-macedonia-election/north-macedonian-pro-western-nationalist-candidates-tied-in-presidential-vote-idUSKCN1RX008]. Here in the title they use an adjective: North Macedonian, and in the opening paragraph they use a possessive case: "North Macedonia's". GStojanov (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh for crying out loud. Yes, of course the adjective can be semantically equivalent to the possessive, if and where both are syntactically and stylistically proper. That doesn't mean both are freely exchangeable in all syntactic environments. Do you really need something that basic spelled out to you? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So it is a style objection, since syntax is not an issue either. This is very different than: "grossly ungrammatical". Anyway, it is far more constructive to have a well-meaning editor approach. GStojanov (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote.[edit]

Hi, GStojanov. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. Here is no place for long quotations. There is another project called Wikiquote. Long quotations crowd the actual article and remove attention from other information. Please, check Quotations Overuse. PS. Please, dismiss single primary sources, read In Defense of the Native Tongue: The Standardization of the Macedonian Language and the Bulgarian-Macedonian Linguistic Controversies by Chavdar Marinov and especially p. 441. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GStojanov, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GStojanov,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GStojanov,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GStojanov,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian and Bulgarian phonetics compared[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help%3AIPA%2FBulgarian&type=revision&diff=897279779&oldid=893654775

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stalinist era primary source presented as neutral opinion.[edit]

Hi GStojanov, you are attempting to present a primary communist propaganda outdated source from the Stalinist period, i.e. 1940s as a neutral and correct historical view. Please check WP:BIASED; WP:AGE MATTERS and WP:USINGPRIMARY. Wikipedia is not a place for outdated and controversial political views. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 16:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I posted this from a Bulgarian newspaper from 1946 with a translation of the text that accompanies it. Was the translation inaccurate? Can you help me identify who are the two front men carrying the coffin? I think the one on the right is Todor Pavlov the president of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, and the one on the left is Georgi Dimitrov, the gen-sec of BCP. GStojanov (talk) 18:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitrov is no there, but Pavlov may be the high man in the middle at the bottom, right to the left soldier. Jingiby (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gotse Delchev[edit]

Hi, what do you think, let's put the following text above the line: Yordan Badev recalls in his memoirs that Gotse Delchev, Boris Sarafov, Efrem Chuchkov, and Boris Drangov had organized a group of Bulgarians born in Macedonia to propagate for the future unification of Macedonia and Bulgaria among the cadets of the military school in Sofia. Kosta Tsipushev recalls how, when he and some friends asked Gotsé why they were fighting for the autonomy of Macedonia and Thrace instead of their liberation and reunification with the motherland, he replied: Comrades, can't you see that we are now the slaves not of the Turkish state, which is in the process of disintegration, but of the Great Powers in Europe, before whom Turkey signed her total capitulation in Berlin. That is why we have to struggle for the autonomy of Macedonia and Thrace, in order to preserve them in their entirety, as a stage towards their reunification with our common Bulgarian fatherland. Pavlos Kyrou (Pavel Kirov) from Zhelevo claims in his memoirs that once, when Delchev came from Bulgaria, he met him in Konomladi. Delchev insisted there that Greek priests and schoolmasters are obstacles. He maintained also that all the local Slavophones are Bulgarians and they must work for Bulgarian cause, because its army will come and help them to throw off the Turkish yoke. In the memories of Andon Kyoseto, it is alleged that Delchev explained him that IMRO cannot win full freedom for Macedonia, but it will fight at least for autonomy. The ultimate goal of the Organization, according to Delchev, is a secrecy, but one day, sooner or later, Macedonia will unite itself with Bulgaria, and Greece and Serbia should not doubt in that. On 12 January 1903 his fellow Peyo Yavorov recorded one of Delchev's last messages in his shorthand notes, when they crossеd the misty border of Bulgaria to the Ottoman Empire entering Macedonia, namely: "I pointed out the misty area on Delchev, who was close to me and I said: Look, Macedonia welcomes us mourning!" But he answered: “We will tear away this veil and the sun of freedom will arise, but it will be a Bulgarian sun”. Jingiby (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already labeled as a personal essay. If you add some more personal recollections and memories you will just firm that conclusion up. We need to move in the opposite direction. GStojanov (talk) 12:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should read up on what a personal essay is because the tag is wrongly used. How can it be a personal reflection, are you trying to say that Jingiby is Yordan Badev who died in 1944? Also it seems to me that you do not care about the facts you just want to push your pov. It seems simply ridiculous that you are arguing for Gotse Delchev to be a nationality that didn't exist at the time. --StoyanStoyanov80 (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should read up too here: WP:FORUM GStojanov (talk) 14:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it multiple times before, what part exactly applies to the Gotse Delchev page? --StoyanStoyanov80 (talk) 15:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinions and ruminations (yours or that of Yordan Badev). It is rather than opinion of historians, anthropologists, sociologists, etc. GStojanov (talk) 19:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that is pretty obvious but you didn't answer why it applies to the Gotse Delchev page, the page has over 200 reliable sources, and the opinion of Yordan Badev is relevant as he was a member of the IMRO and he was a prominent journalist and writer during the late 19th and early 20th century. Please take some time to read about Gotse Delchev from real books and not nationalistic social media pages because I am not sure how you can say he is not a Bulgarian if you knew what you were talking about. --StoyanStoyanov80 (talk) 23:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification.[edit]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 19:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was not my intention to offend anyone, especially you Jingiby. You are among the few Bulgarian editors that I can reason with. But it is frustrating to co-edit with editors that are completely oblivious to any other point of view, except for their cold-war-era nationalistic view. GStojanov (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Parteniy Zografski, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]