User talk:Gabix15

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Münchausen syndrome by proxy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Münchausen syndrome by proxy was changed by Gabix15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95015 on 2012-04-19T16:32:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Münchausen syndrome by proxy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. AndieM (Am I behaving?) 16:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Hunger Games (film), you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Hunger Games (film) was changed by Gabix15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889622 on 2012-04-20T17:44:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lisa Cross, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lisa Cross was changed by Gabix15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943961 on 2012-05-01T09:38:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lisa Cross with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 09:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Melchoir (talk) 09:41, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MGCE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MGCE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Alphaswitch91 (talk) 16:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manx gymnastic Centre of excellence

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manx gymnastic Centre of excellence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nczempin (talk) 18:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vanessa Morgan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 03:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jim1138 (talk) 03:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 03:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Vanessa Morgan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jschnur (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note also that wikias don't meet the standards listed in WP:RS as they are edited by anonymous people who don't say where they get their info. Purported last name does not have a reliable source and was previously removed from the article as unreferenced here. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY about the need for a very good reference for peoples full name, sometimes they don't want that info known and we respect that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vanessa Morgan

It's Surname Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vanessa Morgan in 2011.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vanessa Morgan in 2011.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vanessa Morgan

The last undo wasn't me! Really! I did check after the second time. Adding another last name raises red flags. Put this just to the right of the "real name" <ref>[http://vanessamorgancmizary.weebly.com/bio.html Vanessa Morgan biography]</ref> A wiki is considered an unreliable source as anyone can edit it or the edits are not carefully verified. So, use the one above. Go into the "View history", click "undo" at the right of the top line. Add the reference. In the wp:edit summary add "reference added" this will help prevent someone else undoing your edit. Watch those copyrights! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self declared official site. Need some proof it is actually hers and not some fan site. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add. Definitely a poser. Twitter listed in that site does not go to a verified account. Twitter listed at real official site http://www.vanessamorgan.ca does. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:40, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Vanessa Morgan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Her official site is http://www.vanessamorgan.ca and says nothing about this. Wikia is not reliable. Stop adding this without a reference that meets WP:RS standards. Wikia isn't one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Vanessa Morgan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]