User talk:Gameworldduelist2

Welcome!

Hello, Gameworldduelist2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Spellcast 23:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

updating the Nets' stats[edit]

Hi, would be great if you could update the totals and "correct as of" columns as well so that a recount does not need to be performed. Chensiyuan 04:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to February 17, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You may also find reading Wikipedia:Verifiability useful as it contains information on how to cite sources which can reduce the chances of your contributions from being reverted in the future. Thank you. Natalie 16:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to 50 Cent discography, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spellcast 23:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you've edited the 50 Cent discography page again, changing Get Rich or Die Tryin' from 6x platinum to 7x platinum. Although sources show that its sold over 7 million, I don't think that necessarily means the RIAA has certified it 7x platinum. The RIAA site has it at 6x paltinum, so if you have a more reliable source saying otherwise, please say so otherwise it will be removed. Thanks. Spellcast 06:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Game discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Spellcast 02:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to NCAA Division I-A national football championship. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. KelleyCook 20:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Hi, I reverted this edit because it broke the table. Please use the preview button to avoid mistakes, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 00:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Durango High School[edit]

A tag has been placed on Durango High School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _pete 21:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Milli.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Milli.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 04:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Milli.PNG)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Milli.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 04:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stanky legg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stanky legg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 20:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gameworldduelist2. You have new messages at TheJazzDalek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: E-mail Unblock Request[edit]

I read your message you sent me and I'm sorry to say that I can't unblock you at this point. It appears that all three accounts have too similar an editing tone to be considered separate users. On a final note, please try and remain civil when requesting an unblock, whether on wikipedia or through e-mail. Name calling and swearing is unnecessary. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NuggetsFan09 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]