User talk:General announcement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possibly unfree File:Simonward01.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Simonward01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 72.88.56.113 (talk) 02:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jennyagutter01.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jennyagutter01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 72.88.56.113 (talk) 02:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dePRODing of articles[edit]

Hello General announcement, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:

  • PROD removed from Sven Harvey, by User:JIP, with summary '(removed prod notice, I think he's notable)'
  • PROD removed from Simon Plumbe, by User:JIP, with summary '(removed prod notice, I think he's notable)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

NowCommons: File:Angel&Badman01.jpg[edit]

File:Angel&Badman01.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Angel and the Badman 1947.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Angel and the Badman 1947.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar[edit]

The idea of the RfC is to try and get some outside opinions, but not to edit the intro at present. At present its largely deadlocked between two camps, those who would like to think of Gibraltar a British colony run by westminister and those who think its self-governing.

However, since the 2006 constitution, everything apart from defence and foreign relations is done by the elected Government. I see that in Liechtenstein, has no military forces (prohibited) and yet they are described as self-governing.

Please do not be discouraged from looking for references and joining the discussion. --Gibnews (talk) 01:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article David Strangeways has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Robbybensonstrangers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Robbybensonstrangers.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angr (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Inn at Farnborough[edit]

The article The Inn at Farnborough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't show any apparent notability, borderline advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]