User talk:GetResearchFunction
|
An extended welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again.--Ronz (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Vitalism
[edit]Hello, I'm Ronz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vitalism seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- My opinion is that there is a neutral point of view. Science is about proving things, not disproving things. I tried to make it neutral, but then you reverted it. Why did you do that, and exactly what was not neutral about it? GetResearchFunction (talk) 23:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have decided to revert YOUR reversion. That is because:
- You are not an administrator on the English wiki.
- My edit is neutral because people have demonstratably levitated, astral projected, performed telepathy, and much more using life force.
- Link below:
GetResearchFunction (talk) 23:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your explanation. These articles you are trying to change are under special editing restrictions. I'm afraid you're going to find yourself extremely frustrated if you continue as you are doing. Do consider taking my advice an learning your way around Wikipedia before trying to work on such articles. --Ronz (talk) 00:13, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.GetResearchFunction, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi GetResearchFunction! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC) |
Talk:Naturopathy
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 16:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Naturopathy, you may be blocked from editing. See here and here
- thx i got revenge against ur trolling bye GetResearchFunction (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Naturopathy. See here.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)