User talk:Gggg00

This is Gggg00's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi Gggg00! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sammy Wonders (August 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sammy Wonders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gggg00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sammy Wonder (August 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sammy Wonder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I believe this subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article and do show significant coverage about the subject from the most reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject in Nigeria and beyond. The references are from the top 5 newspapers in Nigeria. Thanks Gggg00 (talk) 23:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now, yes. Then, No. Thank you for doing the extra work 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BJ Sam has been accepted[edit]

BJ Sam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wow! thank you so much. I am really grateful Gggg00 (talk) 09:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this person (Redacted) has been taking money from people for creating pages for people but I refused to pay her and she is threatening to take down the page. (Redacted) Gggg00 (talk) 13:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

she said "Even the person who has approved the page has dubious editing pattern" Gggg00 (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent were you aware that you have a "dubious editing pattern"? LOL :))

@Gggg00: there are enough people keeping an eye on this that nobody is going to suddenly just "take it down", so don't worry too much about that – and certainly don't pay anyone any money! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU SO MUCH Gggg00 (talk) 13:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only an administrator can delete the article, and then only for policy reasons. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS Gggg00 (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have never paid anyone to edit this page but many people just want me to pay them, now they have taken down the page Gggg00 (talk) 20:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been deleted for policy reasons and for no other reason. You have the opportunity to appeal asserted by the blocking admin, below. If your appeal is successful you may ask to have the article undeleted.

Note that I mentioned policy reasons above. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks Gggg00 (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Rubiesar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rubiesar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 19:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gggg00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

HELLO, please I am BJ Sam I recently submitted my article for wikipedia and was accepted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BJ_Sam

But there seem to be a misunderstanding with user @Rubiesar which I used to create the account the first time which made some of the editors believe I paid someone to work on the article. So many editors on wikipedia has been writing me and asking for huge amount of money, since I have refuse to paid them, they have been threatening to take down the page. I open another account when I could no longer access my yahoo mail which is linked to @Rubiesar. (rubiesar@ yahoo.com)

my username now is @Gggg00 and I have studied the wikipedia well and know how to create a page myself. Please kindly unblock me and restore my page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BJ_Sam Gggg00 (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. Those "other editors" asking you for huge amounts of money are scamming you; please list their usernames here so we can try to reduce their bad behavior. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gggg00 (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gggg00 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really apologise for creating an article about yourself which is often seen as a violation of conflict of interest rules on Wikipedia, even though I tried to remain neutral. Kindly unblock and restore the page. Gggg00 (talk) 08:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to request unblock from your original account, and no, you won't be unblocked to, in the near term, write about yourself. Perhaps once you have a good edit history of edits in other areas to demonstrate your understanding of guidelines, but not now. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This account is blocked because you were using it to evade the blocks on your earlier accounts. When one account is blocked, you are not permitted to make a new one. Your only chance of getting unblocked would be to appeal at your original account, but be advised that you are very unlikely to find an administrator willing to unblock someone who intends to create an article about themselves. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]