User talk:Gina Kano

Welcome!

Hello, Gina Kano, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SL93 (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Planned Maintenance Optimization

The article Planned Maintenance Optimization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopaedic essay

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is encyclopedic. it relates to an entire section of reliability engineering that is not covered in Wikipedia and has sources in all major academic libraries including the Britannica. I noticed that PMO was not given any notice in Wikipedia and opened up the first page for people to start editing. The idea that we "delete" somethign we don't understand is not acceptable. First we need to allow public editing, enabling leaders in the field of expertise to edit such pages before we immediately delete. This is a public platform not a personal one.Gina Kano (talk) 01:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down

You really do not seem to be able to understand anything anyone has ever told you (either that, or you're pretending you don't understand; deletion attack? Seriously?) The new article you have created is still the same unencyclopedic mess, a horrible wall of poorly written, largely unsourced text that has nothing to do with the way articles on Wikipedia should be written. Again, I strongly recommend you create a draft first, then submit the article for creation, and only then if the draft is accepted, create the article in mainspace. You are really unable to create an acceptable encyclopedic article on your own. You should really study what Wikipedia is and how to write proper articles before you start contributing. There is plenty of help available. You really do not have the slightest clue. And most importantly, you should stop ignoring everything everyone is telling you, playing the victim and complaining that everyone except you is stupid. Everything you have done on Wikipedia so far has been completely wrong.—J. M. (talk) 02:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft and Constructive Criticism

I am trying to transfer the article to a draft space, can you help.Gina Kano (talk) 03:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drafting

JM can you help me transfer the article Disruptive Power of Repair Management Method DPRMM to a draft page so we can work on it. Thank you. Gina Kano (talk) 03:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slowing Down

Hi J.M. Thank you for the advice. Had you started this way, and had anyone started by offering advice first before deleting and attacking newbie writers the world would be a better place and we would not need to be victims. Consider this, the site does not let yo make a draft, nowhere is there a drafting section, there is a sandbox and "publish" button, but no "save to draft" button. Had I had such a button I would have drafted first. In regards to my "mess", I think you are being a little over-zealous in your wording, as usual there seems to be a little bit of insensitivity going one where "editors" like yourself allow yourselves to be abusive rather then nurturing. If you would start by helping rather then "deleting" the Wikipedia experience would be better for everyone. Now for the operative side of things: where can I draft and who can help me with editing for publication?

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Disruptive Power of Repair Management Method DPRMM, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 03:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Planned Maintenance Optimization

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Planned Maintenance Optimization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://iot-analytics.com/top-20-companies-enabling-predictive-maintenance. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Planned Maintenance Optimization is also tagged for speedy deletion for the same infringement. —C.Fred (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

draft:Disruptive Power of Repair Management Method DPRMM updated and requesting someone review it and leave me their editorial comments so I can continue to improve the content.Gina Kano (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Capex replacement model

Hello, Gina Kano. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Capex replacement model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 13:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Disruptive Power of Repair Management Method DPRMM

Hello, Gina Kano. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disruptive Power of Repair Management Method DPRMM".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]