User talk:Goof22822733

Hello[edit]

I will try to be smart on here Goof22822733 (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I HATE EVEYRHRIGNGUHIFejrg0tkhyf Goof22822733 (talk) 19:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: What to do when You go Bald (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:What to do when You go Bald and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goof22822733! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Giraffer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to OpenAI—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 19:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Carson Lee"[edit]

Carson Lee, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organization, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. TartarTorte 15:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i hat everygint[edit]

jpoiuhyg7tf68r7 Goof22822733 (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carson Lee (myth)[edit]

Hello Goof22822733,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carson Lee (myth) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carson Lee (myth)[edit]

Hello Goof22822733,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Carson Lee (myth) for deletion, because it appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important and/or recognized enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Fortnite. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:What to do when You go Bald[edit]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:What to do when You go Bald, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:53, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to use your user talk page inappropriately while blocked, you risk having access to it revoked. ^Complex/_Rational 15:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goof22822733 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really smart Goof22822733 (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goof22822733 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge I was being stinky I will not do that anymore and I will not ask about Fortnite and Fortnite-adjacent things on "important editors" pages

Decline reason:

I'm going to be honest. I don't think right now you have the maturity to edit here. What I would recommend is walk away from Wikipedia for awhile, mature and then come back to request an unblock. This I would say would be at least a year. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goof22822733 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will be serious and stuff

Decline reason:

Duplicate request RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Seeing as you just emailed me asking why you weren't able to edit, and I come to find out that you vandalized your unblock request to make it seem like I did it, I've both revoked your talk page access rights and ability to email from this account. Let me add, I have a great deal of concern of your maturity to edit, so your only avenue is to go to WP:UTRS to request an unblock. Please do not do that until you gain a bit more maturity. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #70376 [edit]

is closed. Wot "the big meany" (but not as big a meany as me) said. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]