User talk:Grande Mughal
|
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Sayyad Muhammad Khan Baloch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- unsourced and appears npov
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wrathofjames (talk) 01:21, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
List of Mughal nobles
[edit]You've been making a lot of these articles that are a little difficult to understand because they don't provide the reader much context. They also don't appear to be sourced. You're obviously working from some list or something. Could you add in that source to these articles, or provide some more context so others can expand them. As they are now they're not very accessible to the reader. Shadowjams (talk) 02:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Zakariya Khan Bahadur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I can't find any sources to verify this.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Yahya Khan Bahadur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I can find no source for this. The only mentions I can find anywhere are in other Wikipedia articles, all but one of them created today by the author of this article, and the other one having had the statement added recently by an IP editor.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
[edit] Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the articles. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content as you did on Muhammad Shah. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wachoviadeal (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of User:Mughal Lohar that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Dougweller (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC) |