User talk:Groupir !

According to the Goon Show main page, you edited it 22 days ago. It's now a complete blank; any idea what has happened? 81.137.28.238 (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)tony

La page n'a pas du tout été blanchie Qu'est-ce que c'est cette histoire de fou ? - Groupir ! (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Le Crocodile (temporary poster of the film project).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Le Crocodile (temporary poster of the film project).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello @Stefan2: the image is used on a draft page (User:Groupir !/Le Crocodile) which I work on. The page is translated from his french version (the only one) : Le Crocodile (projet de film inabouti). - Groupir ! (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

As stated above, the file is not used in any articles. A user draft is not an article and may not contain non-free files, see WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

So, if I post the article before the 24 december, the file will be conserved ? But, I have a bad level in English : can you help me to write this article ? - Groupir ! (talk) 22:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French President Charles de Gaulle Official portrait.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French President Charles de Gaulle Official portrait.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French President François Mitterrand Official portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French President François Mitterrand Official portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French President Georges Pompidou Official portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French President Georges Pompidou Official portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French President Jacques Chirac Official portrait.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French President Jacques Chirac Official portrait.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

White genocide conspiracy theory

Please use the talk page as you've now been reverted by two editors who think it's unnecessary. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• Honestly, you could have just started a talk page discussion asking what was meant by that phrase to begin with instead of edit warring. If you didn't already know that it was a reference to White privilege, then you need to go do some reading before you consider making any changes to the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Like, seriously, if you had made one more revert, you'd've been blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@Ian.thomson: Thanks ! Finally, someone is helping me for this simple thing. I did not consider to make any changes to this article. I was just reading it and I've only asked if a definition could be added to explain this strange expression that I didn't understand. I live in a place where races are not a thing, so I am not really aware of all those theories. I was suggesting only a little improvement and then 3 guys aswered to me with condescension... - Groupir ! (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

No one lives in a place where there is no racism. Unless Antarctica? Doug Weller talk 11:07, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: A lot of country consider that race doesn't exist. - Groupir ! (talk) 20:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Your recent editing history at White genocide conspiracy theory shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 07:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Roger Borniche 1991.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Roger Borniche 1991.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@Whpq: Fair-use doesn't longer exist ? - Groupir ! (talk) 01:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

The image is from Corbis / Getty. Images from commercial photo agencies are almost never acceptable. See WP:NFCC#2 and WP:F7. -- Whpq (talk) 01:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Roger Borniche 1991.jpg, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tintin and the Picaros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most expensive animated films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M6.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)