User talk:Grush

January 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Facilitated Application Specification Techniques has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Facilitated Application Specification Techniques was changed by Grush (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922074 on 2016-01-26T14:06:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Rush (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://mgrconsulting.com/index.php/gary-rush-mgr-consulting-facilitator-training-facilitation?format=pdf, http://www.mgrconsulting.com/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Grush/sandbox/Gary Rush may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 16:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Grush, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 16:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Grush/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Rush (February 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

You need to do a close read of wp:rs, which is the guidelines for reliable sources. In general, you are not using appropriate sources. His own writings are primary sources, as is the email discussion. You need writings that are ABOUT him. #2 seems to be a bibliography of some sort, and does not support notability for him. (Also do a close read of wp:n on notability.) Being in a speaker list does not confer notability, it only shows that he spoke at that event. Again, you need sources ABOUT him not BY him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Rush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest[edit]

Hello, Grush. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Rush (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

I made some formatting and style changes. You do not have any references regarding his business or business activities, and those are the most important to have. They must be third-party and independent of him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Rush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Rush (February 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

You have ignored the conflict of interest notice on your talk page. This is not acceptable, User:Grush. Are you Gary Rush? If not, why are you using that name to create this article, as well as the article on his "invention" FAST? And note that one of your edits says: "(Corrected description - FAST was created by me, Gary Rush, IAF CPF)"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Rush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI discussion[edit]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 22:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of FAST article[edit]

"A page existed with completely false information on it". Well, that's not true, is it? The article you created previously had been deleted after a discussion so there was nothing for you to correct. Conflicts of interest are, unfortunately, often invisible to those committing them. The fact is, you shouldn't be creating or editing a page about something that involves you so directly, as it is very difficult for you to abide by the neutral point of view policy. Deb (talk) 16:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was an article prior to mine and it was completely false. I simply replaced it. It was deleted because I'm learning how to post here. I had posted the original article from Computerworld - copyright problem even though I wrote it. I removed it and worked to make it neutral. So - it is true that the previous one was wrong (not my previous attempt - the original one). I've looked at the policy - this article is not about me and I no longer sell the product - just simply trying to get the history right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.53.188 (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the article mentioned above was about me - a bio - and I understand the COI. FAST is the only article I'm concerned with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.53.188 (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article mentioned above is more than about you - it is an autobiography, something that is highly discouraged. If you do understand the COI, then you understand that you must declare your COI on the talk page of the FAST article, and you must cease to edit it directly. You can request that suggested edits be done by non-involved editors. Those editors will determine if the edits are appropriate. LaMona (talk) 18:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Facilitated Application Specification Techniques[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Facilitated Application Specification Techniques requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mgrconsulting.com/index.php/gary-rush-mgr-consulting-facilitator-training-facilitation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the copyvio, tidied up what's left and left some notes on its talk page. —SMALL JIM 16:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]